Cited by 189Ethics and Social Impacts of AITopic ModelingGender Studies in Language

Evaluating the Underlying Gender Bias in Contextualized Word Embeddings

Open access
Basta, Christine, Costa-jussà, Marta R., Casas, Noe·2019·Proceedings of the First Workshop on Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing

Abstract

Gender bias is highly impacting natural language processing applications.Word embeddings have clearly been proven both to keep and amplify gender biases that are present in current data sources.Recently, contextualized word embeddings have enhanced previous word embedding techniques by computing word vector representations dependent on the sentence they appear in.In this paper, we study the impact of this conceptual change in the word embedding computation in relation with gender bias.Our analysis includes different measures previously applied in the literature to standard word embeddings.Our findings suggest that contextualized word embeddings are less biased than standard ones even when the latter are debiased.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/w19-3805

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Tomas Mikolov, Ilya Sutskever, Kai Chen, Greg S Cor- rado, and Jeff Dean. 2013. Distributed representa- tions of words and phrases and their composition- ality. In C. J. C. Burges, L. Bottou, M. Welling, Z. Ghahramani, and K. Q. Weinberger, editors, Ad- vances in Neural Information Processing Systems 26, pages 3111-3119.
  2. Matthew Peters, Mark Neumann, Mohit Iyyer, Matt Gardner, Christopher Clark, Kenton Lee, and Luke Zettlemoyer. 2018. Deep contextualized word rep- resentations. In Proceedings of the 2018 Confer- ence of the North American Chapter of the Associ- ation for Computational Linguistics: Human Lan- guage Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers), pages 2227-2237, New Orleans, Louisiana. Association for Computational Linguistics.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Basta, C., Costa-jussà, M. R., & Casas, N.
Affiliations
Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (ES)
Venue
Proceedings of the First Workshop on Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing
Published
2019
Pages
33-39
OpenAlex
W2972668795
Cited by
189
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 10
FWCI
23.69
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Workshop on Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing (GeBNLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • UPCommons institutional repository (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-17-CHR2-0004)
  • Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (TEC2015-69266-P)
  • Agència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca
  • European Regional Development Fund (TEC2015-69266-P)
  • Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Studies in Language
Keywords
gender bias, contextual word embeddings, word embeddings

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review