Cited by 41Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesBehavioral Health and InterventionsMedication Adherence and Compliance

Results from the Trial Using Motivational Interviewing, Positive Affect, and Self-Affirmation in African Americans with Hypertension (TRIUMPH)

Open access
Boutin-Foster, Carla, Offidani, Emanuela, Kanna, Balavenkatesh, Ogedegbe, Gbenga, Ravenell, Joseph, Scott, Ebony, Rodriguez, Anna, Ramos, Rosio +3 more·2016·Ethnicity & Disease

Abstract

Objective: Our objective was to determine the the effectiveness in combining positive affect and self-affirmation strategies with motivational interviewing in improving blood pressure control among hypertensive African Americans compared with AA hypertensives in an education-only control group. Design: Randomized trial. Setting: Ambulatory practices in the South Bronx and Harlem, New York City. Participants: African American adults with uncontrolled hypertension. Interventions: Participants were randomized to a positive affect and self-affirmation intervention or an education control group. The positive affect and self-affirmation intervention involved having participants think about things that made them happy and that reminded them of their core values on a daily basis. These strategies were reinforced every two months through motivational interviewing. The control arm received a workbook of strategies on blood pressure control. All participants were called every two months for one year. Main outcomes: Blood pressure control rate. Results: A total of 238 participants were randomized. The average age was 56+ 11, approximately 70% were female, 80% were not married, and up to 70% completed high school. There was no difference in control rates between the intervention and the control group. However, at one year, female participants were more likely to be controlled. Participants with high depressive symptoms or high perceived stress at baseline were less likely to be controlled. Conclusions: While this study did not demonstrate an intervention effect, it does provide important insight into the psychosocial factors that may underlie blood pressure control in African Americans. Implications for future behavioral intervention trials are discussed. Ethn Dis. 2016;26(1):51-60; doi:10.18865/ed.26.1.51

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18865/ed.26.1.51

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [9]9. Milner W, Rollnick S. Motivational Interviewing. New York and London: Guilford Press; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  2. [14]14. Isen AM. Some Perspectives on Positive Affect and Self-Regulation. Psychol Inq. 2000;11(3):184-187. [Google Scholar]
  3. [21]21. Olson E, Van Wye G, Kerker B, Thorpe L, Frieden TR. NYC Community Health Profiles. Take Care Central Harlem. 2006;20(42):1-16. [Google Scholar]
  4. [29]29. Steele CM. A threat in the air. How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. Am Psychol. 1997;52(6):613-629. 10.1037/0003-066X.52.6.613 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boutin-Foster, C., Offidani, E., Kanna, B., Ogedegbe, G., Ravenell, J., Scott, E., Rodriguez, A., Ramos, R., Michelen, W., Gerber, L. M., & Charlson, M.
Affiliations
  • Cornell University (US)
  • Lincoln Medical Center (US)
  • NYU Langone Health (US)
  • Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
Venue
Ethnicity & Disease
Published
2016-01-21
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
51
ISSN
  • 1049-510X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-0826
OpenAlex
W2300316606
Cited by
41
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1
FWCI
4.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ethnicity & Disease (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (P60MD003421)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
Keywords
hypertension, blood pressure control, African Americans, motivational interviewing, positive affect, self-affirmation, psychosocial interventions, depressive symptoms, perceived stress, sex differences, behavioral interventions
MeSH terms
Adult, Black or African American, Blood Pressure, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, New York City, Research Design, Health Behavior, Motivational Interviewing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review