The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Climate and wildfire area burned in western U.S. ecoprovinces, 1916–2003
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to quantify climatic controls on the area burned by fire in different vegetation types in the western United States. We demonstrate that wildfire area burned (WFAB) in the American West was controlled by climate during the 20th century (1916–2003). Persistent ecosystem‐specific correlations between climate and WFAB are grouped by vegetation type (ecoprovinces). Most mountainous ecoprovinces exhibit strong year‐of‐fire relationships with low precipitation, low Palmer drought severity index (PDSI), and high temperature. Grass‐ and shrub‐dominated ecoprovinces had positive relationships with antecedent precipitation or PDSI. For 1977–2003, a few climate variables explain 33–87% (mean = 64%) of WFAB, indicating strong linkages between climate and area burned. For 1916–2003, the relationships are weaker, but climate explained 25–57% (mean = 39%) of the variability. The variance in WFAB is proportional to the mean squared for different data sets at different spatial scales. The importance of antecedent climate (summer drought in forested ecosystems and antecedent winter precipitation in shrub and grassland ecosystems) indicates that the mechanism behind the observed fire–climate relationships is climatic preconditioning of large areas of low fuel moisture via drying of existing fuels or fuel production and drying. The impacts of climate change on fire regimes will therefore vary with the relative energy or water limitations of ecosystems. Ecoprovinces proved a useful compromise between ecologically imprecise state‐level and localized gridded fire data. The differences in climate–fire relationships among the ecoprovinces underscore the need to consider ecological context (vegetation, fuels, and seasonal climate) to identify specific climate drivers of WFAB. Despite the possible influence of fire suppression, exclusion, and fuel treatment, WFAB is still substantially controlled by climate. The implications for planning and management are that future WFAB and adaptation to climate change will likely depend on ecosystem‐specific, seasonal variation in climate. In fuel‐limited ecosystems, fuel treatments can probably mitigate fire vulnerability and increase resilience more readily than in climate‐limited ecosystems, in which large severe fires under extreme weather conditions will continue to account for most area burned.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. A. (1989) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3242-6 · Cited by 16,836
Warming and earlier spring increase western U.S. forest wildfire activity.
Westerling, A. L., Hidalgo, H. G., Cayan, D. R., & Swetnam, T. W. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1128834 · Cited by 5,176 · cited 6×
“Warming spring and winter conditions will presumably continue to lengthen the fire season in these areas (e.g., Westerling et al. 2006).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationThe interaction of fire, fuels, and climate across Rocky Mountain forests
SCHOENNAGEL, T., VEBLEN, T. T., & ROMME, W. H. (2004) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0661:tioffa]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 776
Taylor, A. H., & Skinner, C. N. (2003) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2003)013[0704:spacoh]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 377
Characterizing wildfire regimes in the United States
Malamud, B. D., Millington, J. D. A., & Perry, G. L. W. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0500880102 · Cited by 259
Forest Service Large Fire Area Burned and Suppression Expenditure Trends, 1970–2002
Calkin, D. E., Gebert, K. M., Jones, J. G., & Neilson, R. P. (2005) · Journal of Forestry · doi:10.1093/jof/103.4.179 · Cited by 251
Forest fire causes and extent on United States Forest Service lands
Stephens, S. L. (2005) · International Journal of Wildland Fire · doi:10.1071/wf04006 · Cited by 232
Cited by
Impact of anthropogenic climate change on wildfire across western US forests
Abatzoglou, J. T., & Williams, A. P. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1607171113 · Cited by 3,073
Climate-induced variations in global wildfire danger from 1979 to 2013
Jolly, W. M., Cochrane, M. A., Freeborn, P. H., Holden, Z. A., Brown, T. J., Williamson, G. J., & Bowman, D. M. J. S. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms8537 · Cited by 2,200
Increasing western US forest wildfire activity: sensitivity to changes in the timing of spring
Westerling, A. L. (2016) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2015.0178 · Cited by 1,322
Self-citationGlobal and Regional Trends and Drivers of Fire Under Climate Change
Jones, M. W., Abatzoglou, J. T., Veraverbeke, S., Andela, N., Lasslop, G., Forkel, M., Smith, A. J. P., Burton, C., Betts, R. A., van der Werf, G. R., et al. (2022) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/2020rg000726 · Cited by 1,332
Large wildfire trends in the western United States, 1984–2011
Dennison, P. E., Brewer, S. C., Arnold, J. D., & Moritz, M. A. (2014) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1002/2014gl059576 · Cited by 1,322
Metadata
- Authors
- Littell, J. S., McKenzie, D., Peterson, D. L., & Westerling, A. L.
- Venue
- Ecological Applications
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-06
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1003-1021
- ISSN
- 1051-0761 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-5582
- OpenAlex
- W2115506886
- Cited by
- 1,053
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 35.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Climate and wildfire area burned in western U.S. ecoprovinces, 1916–2003. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/07-1183.1
- The paper
- Littell, J. S., McKenzie, D., Peterson, D. L., & Westerling, A. L. (2009). Climate and wildfire area burned in western U.S. ecoprovinces, 1916–2003. Ecological Applications. https://doi.org/10.1890/07-1183.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.