The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Elicitation by design in ecology: using expert opinion to inform priors for Bayesian statistical models
Open accessAbstract
Bayesian statistical modeling has several benefits within an ecological context. In particular, when observed data are limited in sample size or representativeness, then the Bayesian framework provides a mechanism to combine observed data with other “prior” information. Prior information may be obtained from earlier studies, or in their absence, from expert knowledge. This use of the Bayesian framework reflects the scientific “learning cycle,” where prior or initial estimates are updated when new data become available. In this paper we outline a framework for statistical design of expert elicitation processes for quantifying such expert knowledge, in a form suitable for input as prior information into Bayesian models. We identify six key elements: determining the purpose and motivation for using prior information; specifying the relevant expert knowledge available; formulating the statistical model; designing effective and efficient numerical encoding; managing uncertainty; and designing a practical elicitation protocol. We demonstrate this framework applies to a variety of situations, with two examples from the ecological literature and three from our experience. Analysis of these examples reveals several recurring important issues affecting practical design of elicitation in ecological problems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (2003) · doi:10.1201/9780429258480 · Cited by 27,276
The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7455683 · Cited by 18,497
Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9 · Cited by 9,984 · cited 1×
“In addition experts may be prepared by gathering and listing all potential sources of expertise (experience, literature, and so on), which can help reduce availability bias, being the tendency to recall recent or important information (Tversky and Kahneman 1973).”
BackgroundHoeting, J. A., Madigan, D., Raftery, A. E., & Volinsky, C. T. (1999) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1009212519 · Cited by 4,118
Gelman, A. (2006) · Bayesian Analysis · doi:10.1214/06-ba117a · Cited by 4,050
Dawid, A. P. (1982) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1982.10477856 · Cited by 625
Cited by
A practical guide to structured expert elicitation using the IDEA protocol
Hemming, V., Burgman, M. A., Hanea, A. M., McBride, M. F., & Wintle, B. C. (2018) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.12857 · Cited by 528
A guide to eliciting and using expert knowledge in Bayesian ecological models
Kuhnert, P. M., Martin, T. G., & Griffiths, S. P. (2010) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01477.x · Cited by 441
The Role of Expert Opinion in Environmental Modelling
Krueger, T., Page, T., Hubacek, K., Smith, L., & Hiscock, K. (2012) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.01.011 · Cited by 413
Morris, W. K., Vesk, P. A., McCarthy, M. A., Bunyavejchewin, S., & Baker, P. J. (2015) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.1346 · Cited by 51
(2012) · Montana State University ScholarWorks (Montana State University) · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Choy, S. L., O'Leary, R., & Mengersen, K.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 265-277
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2098365715
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 15.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Elicitation by design in ecology: using expert opinion to inform priors for Bayesian statistical models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/07-1886.1
- The paper
- Choy, S. L., O'Leary, R., & Mengersen, K. (2009). Elicitation by design in ecology: using expert opinion to inform priors for Bayesian statistical models. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1890/07-1886.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.