Cited by 48Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsElectroconvulsive Therapy Studies

The Current Status of EMDR Therapy, Specific Target Areas, and Goals for the Future

Open access
Matthijssen, Suzy J. M. A., Lee, Christopher W., de Roos, Carlijn, Barron, Ian G., Jarero, Ignacio, Shapiro, Elan, Hurley, E. C., Schubert, Sarah J. +5 more·2020·Journal of EMDR Practice and Research

Abstract

While eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) is considered an evidence-based treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in adults, there are differences as to how various international treatment guidelines judge the strength of this evidence base. Furthermore, in areas other than adult PTSD, major guidelines differ even more as to the strength of the evidence base and when to use EMDR. In 2019, the Council of Scholars: The Future of EMDR Therapy Project was initiated. Several working groups were established, with one assigned to the focus area of research. This article is a product of that working group. Firstly the group concluded that there were five areas where there was some base that EMDR was effective, but more data were needed to increase the likelihood that it would be considered in future international treatment guidelines. These areas were PTSD in children and adolescents, early EMDR interventions, combat PTSD, unipolar depression, and chronic pain. In addition, research into cost-effectiveness of EMDR therapy was identified as one of the priorities. A hierarchical system was used for classifying and rating evidence in the focus areas. After assessing the 120 outcome studies pertaining to the focus areas, we conclude that for two of the areas (i.e., PTSD in children and adolescents and EMDR early interventions research) the strength of the evidence is rated at the highest level, whereas the other areas obtain the second highest level. Some general recommendations for improving the quality of future research on the effectiveness of EMDR therapy are formulated.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1891/emdr-d-20-00039

Cites

136 of 136 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Matthijssen, S. J. M. A., Lee, C. W., de Roos, C., Barron, I. G., Jarero, I., Shapiro, E., Hurley, E. C., Schubert, S. J., Baptist, J., Amann, B. L., Moreno-Alcázar, A., Tesarz, J., & de Jongh, A.
Affiliations
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • Murdoch University (AU)
  • Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
  • Mexican Association for Mental Health Support in Crisis, Mexico
  • Ramat Yishay, Israel
  • United States Army (US)
  • Psychology Training, Perth, Western Australia
  • Kansas State University (US)
  • Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
  • Instituto de Neuropsiquiatria i Addiciones (INAD), Barcelona, Spain
  • University Hospital Heidelberg (DE)
  • University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Venue
Journal of EMDR Practice and Research
Published
2020-01
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
241-284
ISSN
  • 1933-3196 (ISSN-L)
  • 1933-320X
OpenAlex
W3109300647
Cited by
48
References
136
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6
FWCI
2.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Journal of EMDR Practice and Research (publishedVersion)
  • Murdoch University Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Keywords
EMDR, post-traumatic stress disorder, children and adolescents, early intervention, major depressive disorder, chronic pain, cost-effectiveness, evidence-based treatment guidelines, research priorities, treatment effectiveness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review