The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
SOCIAL VALIDITY: THE CASE FOR SUBJECTIVE MEASUREMENT or HOW APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS IS FINDING ITS HEART 1
Open accessAbstract
I apologize, but I must begin making my case for subjective measurement by recounting to you my own experiences with it over the past few years.Almost a decade ago, when the field of applied behavior analysis was beginning to expand so rapidly, we were faced with the task of putting together the Journal of Applied Be- havior Analysis.For a period of several months Garth Hopkins, who was our managing editor, presented us with a series of unexpected deci- sions to make; like: What color should the paper be?And did we need a paper that would hold together for two thousand years or were we willing to live with a shelf-life of only a thousand years?And so on.Just a couple of days before we were sched- uled to go to press with our very first issue, Garth called with one more question."What is the purpose of the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis?", he asked.He said we needed to put a description of the purpose on the inside front cover, as one finds in other journals.He needed an answer almost immediately.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“With input from the most important stakeholders—Autistic individuals themselves—intervention goals, procedures, and outcomes are likely to be seen as more acceptable, useful, and effective (Wolf, 1978)”
From Neurodiversity and Autism Intervention: Reconciling Perspectives Through a Naturalistic Developmental Behavioral Intervention Framework (2022) · cites this paper as Wolf, 1978
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“if an intervention does not have high social validity, meaning that it is not viewed as acceptable, useful, and feasible by intervention deliverers (e.g., school staff) and/or recipients (e.g., pupils), then it is likely to fail [16, 17].”
From Study protocol for the Multimodal Approach to Preventing Suicide in Schools (MAPSS) project: A regionally based feasibility trial of an integrated response to suicide risk among UK secondary school pupils (2024) · cites this paper as [17]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kilzer, E., & Skinner, B. F. (1953) · The American Catholic Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/3707860 · Cited by 8,940
Symonds, P. M. (1954) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0051901 · Cited by 4,902
Small is beautiful: economics as if people mattered
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.38-1061 · Cited by 2,601
A History of Experimental Psychology
Ruckmick, C. A., & Boring, E. G. (1930) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1414897 · Cited by 1,814
A History of Experimental Psychology
B., M., & Boring, E. G. (1950) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1418885 · Cited by 1,766
Subjective measures of well-being.
Campbell, A. (1976) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.31.2.117 · Cited by 1,078
Police Encounters With Juveniles
Piliavin, I. M., & Briar, S. (1964) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/223794 · Cited by 550
Foxx, R. M., & Azrin, N. H. (1972) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0005-7967(72)90003-4 · Cited by 279
THE SOCIAL VALIDATION AND TRAINING OF CONVERSATIONAL SKILLS1
Minkin, N., Braukmann, C. J., Minkin, B. L., Timbers, G. D., Timbers, B. J., Fixsen, D. L., Phillips, E. L., & Wolf, M. M. (1976) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1976.9-127 · Cited by 208
Self-citationNonverbal components of empathic communication.
Haase, R. F., & Tepper, D. T. (1972) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0033188 · Cited by 200
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Berleman W. C., 1972, The delinquent prevention experiment of the Seattle Atlantic Street Center: A final evaluation, Social Science Review, 323
- Braukmann C. J., 1975, Issues in evaluating behavior modification, 131
- 1962, New Webster's Vest Pocket Dictionary
- Skinner B. F., 1959, Cumulative record
- Watson John B., 1930, Behaviorism
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,001–1,005 of 1,005
TRAINING COUNSELING SKILLS: AN EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS AND SOCIAL VALIDATION
Whang, P. L., Fletcher, R. K., & Fawcett, S. B. (1982) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1982.15-325 · Cited by 20
Bottema-Beutel, K., Crowley LaPoint, S., Kim, S. Y., Mohiuddin, S., Yu, Q., & McKinnon, R. (2024) · Exceptional Children · doi:10.1177/00144029231167183 · Cited by 18
Lavefjord, A., Sundström, F. T. A., Buhrman, M., & McCracken, L. M. (2021) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2021.05.005 · Cited by 14
Ashworth, E., McCarthy, M., Wynne, S., Robinson, J., McKay, S., Lane, S., Richardson, G., Boardman, N., Henderson, K., Crosbie, V., et al. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0302873 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Wolf, M. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Kansas (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wolf, Montrose M.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1978-06
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 203-214
- ISSN
- 0021-8855 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-3703
- PMC
- PMC1311293
- OpenAlex
- W2020279449
- Cited by
- 3,176
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 135 · 2025: 130 · 2024: 130 · 2023: 165 · 2022: 147 · 2021: 149 · 2020: 114 · 2019: 123 · 2018: 94 · 2017: 94 · 2016: 82 · 2015: 95 · 2014: 93 · 2013: 77 · 2012: 80
- FWCI
- 64.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
- Keywords
- social validity, subjective indicators, applied behavior analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
