Cited by 20Behavioral and Psychological StudiesCounseling Practices and SupervisionProblem Solving Skills Development

TRAINING COUNSELING SKILLS: AN EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS AND SOCIAL VALIDATION

Open access
Whang, Paula L., Fletcher, R. Kay, Fawcett, Stephen B.·1982·Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

Abstract

A community development perspective suggests the value of using local resources to solve local problems. Two low‐income staff of a community service center served as nonprofessional counselors after receiving a training program consisting of written instructions, practice, and performance feedback. The effects of the 40‐hour training program were positive for both counseling and problem‐solving skills. There was also evidence of generalization of counseling performance across clients, problems, and time. In addition, expert judges' ratings of performance were obtained as a measure of social validity. These findings suggest that the training procedures are effective in enhancing the counseling and problem‐solving skills of low‐income nonprofessionals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1901/jaba.1982.15-325

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The RBT guidelines appear inconsistent with the majority of staff training research in the implementation of targeted components of comprehensive intervention.

    “The guidelines also appear to be inconsistent with the majority of staff training research in the implementation of targeted components of comprehensive intervention.”

    From Concerns About the Registered Behavior Technician™ in Relation to Effective Autism Intervention (2017) · cites this paper as Whang, Fletcher, and Fawcett (1982)

    The Counseling and Problem-Solving Procedures section describes training two staff members in specific counseling skills using instruction, practice, and feedback. This provides an example of targeted staff training, but the paper does not discuss RBT guidelines or establish what the majority of staff-training research recommends. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Based on research, 40 h of initial training is likely inadequate for staff with limited to no previous experience.

    “Given the number of skills an interventionist would need to implement effectively (37 in the case of the RBT®), based upon the research, 40 h of initial training is likely inadequate for staff with limited to no previous experience.”

    From Concerns About the Registered Behavior Technician™ in Relation to Effective Autism Intervention (2017) · cites this paper as Whang, Fletcher, and Fawcett (1982)

    The Methods describe two staff members with no prior counseling training, and Generalization Training reports an average of 42 hours of study and trainer time. This lends some support to the concern about training duration, but the paper did not test whether 40 hours was inadequate or study the 37 RBT skills. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. [1]1. Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. Some cur- rent dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1968, 1, 91-97.
  2. [4]4. Borck, L. E., & Fawcett, S. B. Learning counseling and problem-solving skills. New York: Haworth Press, 1982.
  3. [5]5. Borck, L. E., Fawcett, S. B., & Lichtenberg, J. Train- ing counseling and problem-solving skills with university students. American Journal of Com- munity Psychology, 1982, 10, 225-237.
  4. [7]7. Briscoe, R. V., Hoffman, D. B., & Bailey, J. S. Be- havioral community psychology: Training a com- munity board to problem solve. Journal of Ap- plied Behavior Analysis, 1975, 8, 157-168.
  5. [10]10. Carkhuff, R. R., & Truax, C. B. Training in counsel- ing and psychotherapy: An evaluation of an inte- grated diatic and experimental approach. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1965, 29, 333-336.
  6. [11]11. Danish, S. J., & D'Augelli, A. R. Rationale and im- plementation of a training program for para- professionals. Professional Psychology, 1976, 7, 38-46.
  7. [15]15. Fawcett, S. B., & Fletcher, R. K. Community appli- cations of instructional technology: Teaching writers of instructional packages. Journal of Ap- plied Behavior Analysis, 1977, 10, 739-746.
  8. [18]18. Fawcett, S. B., Mathews, R. M., Fletcher, R. K., Mor- row, R., & Stokes, T. F. Personalized instruction in the community: Teaching helping skills to low- income neighborhood residents. Journal of Per- sonalized Instruction, 1976, 1, 86-90.
  9. [28]28. Mathews, R. M., & Fawcett, S. B. Community appli- cations of instructional technology: Training low- income proctors. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1977, 10, 747-754.
  10. [29]29. Mathews, R. M., & Fawcett, S. B. Community infor- mation systems: Analysis of an agency referral program. Journal of Community Psychology, 1979, 7, 281-289.
  11. [30]30. Minkin, N., Braukmann, C. J., Minkin, B. L., Timbers, G. D., Timbers, B. J., Fixsen, D. L., Phillips, E. L., & Wolf, M. M. The social validation and train- ing of conversational skills. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1976, 9, 127-140.
  12. [33]33. Rachman, S., & Wilson, G. T. Effects of psychologi- cal therapy. Elmsford, N.Y.: Pergamon Press, 1980.
  13. [35]35. Reiff, R., & Riessman, F. The indigenous non-pro- fessional: A strategy for change in community ac- tion and community mental health programs. Community Mental Health Journal, 1965, Mono- graph #1.
  14. [38]38. Seekins, T., Mathews, R. M., & Fawcett, S. B. Chair- ing community organization meetings: An experi- mental analysis of the effects of behavioral in- struction. Journal of Community Psychology, in press.
  15. [39]39. Stokes, T. F., & Baer, D. M. An implicit technology of generalization. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1977, 10, 349-368.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Whang, P. L., Fletcher, R. K., & Fawcett, S. B.
Affiliations
University of Kansas (US)
Corresponding author
  • Whang, Paula L.
  • Fawcett, Stephen B.
Venue
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1982-09
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
325-334
ISSN
  • 0021-8855 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-3703
OpenAlex
W2084174857
Cited by
20
References
36
Citations by year
2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 3
FWCI
1.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Problem Solving Skills Development
Keywords
counseling skills training, community service centers, community development, problem-solving skills, performance feedback, generalization of behavior, social validity, expert ratings, local resource use
MeSH terms
Workforce, Allied Health Personnel, Community Mental Health Services, Counseling, Female, Generalization, Psychological, Humans, Problem Solving, Role Playing, Social Class, Teaching

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review