Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 187

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

NONHUMANS HAVE NOT YET SHOWN STIMULUS EQUIVALENCE

Open access
Hayes, Steven C.·1989·Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

Abstract

Recently, two published articles have reported finding stimulus equivalence in nonhumans. One suggested that equivalence was due to the mediation of names. The procedure used trained all components of all tested relations. Because nothing was derived, the defining characteristics of equivalence were not achieved. In the second study a definition of equivalence was proposed that fails to distinguish functional stimulus classes from equivalence classes. The resulting data are not clearly relevant to stimulus equivalence in Sidman's sense of the term. Stimulus equivalence has not yet been shown in nonhumans.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1901/jeab.1989.51-385

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Cohen L. R., 1981, Quantitative analyses of behavior: Vol. 1. Discriminative properties of reinforcement schedules, 345
  2. 10.1901/jeab.1985.44-35 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1901/jeab.1986.46-243 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1016/0022-0965(76)90064-3 · DOI
  5. Hayes S. C., 1987, Upward and downward continuity: It's time to change our strategic assumptions, Behavior Analysis, 22, 3
  6. Hayes S. C., Dialogues on verbal behavior
  7. Hayes S. C., Stimulus equivalence and the symbolic control of behavior, Revista Mexicana de Analisis de la Conducta
  8. Hayes S. C., Rule‐governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control
  9. 10.1901/jeab.1977.27-381 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1901/jeab.1984.41-251 · DOI
  11. 10.1901/jeab.1988.49-395 · DOI
  12. 10.1901/jeab.1987.47-279 · DOI
  13. 10.1044/jshr.1401.05 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-261 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1901/jeab.1982.37-23 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1901/jeab.1982.37-5 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Spradlin J. E., 1973, Establishing a conditional discrimination without direct training: A study of transfer with retarded adolescents, American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 77, 556
  18. 10.1037/0097-7403.14.1.36 · doi:10.1037/0097-7403.14.1.36

Cited by

See all 187

Metadata

Authors
Hayes, S. C.
Venue
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1989-05
Volume
51
Issue
3
Pages
385-392
ISSN
  • 0022-5002 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-3711
OpenAlex
W2163102762
Cited by
187
References
1
FWCI
13.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: NONHUMANS HAVE NOT YET SHOWN STIMULUS EQUIVALENCE. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1901/jeab.1989.51-385
The paper
Hayes, S. C. (1989). NONHUMANS HAVE NOT YET SHOWN STIMULUS EQUIVALENCE. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1989.51-385

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.