Cited by 205Organizational Learning and LeadershipEmployee Performance and ManagementJob Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior

The effect of organizational learning on organizational commitment, job satisfaction and work performance

Open access
Rose, Raduan Che, Kumar, Naresh, Pak, Ong Gua·2011·Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR)

Abstract

The literature review reveals that there is a relationship between organizational learning organizational commitment, job satisfaction and work performance. However, it is apparent that the integrated relationships between these variables have not been found to be reported. Hence, we examine the relationship among these variables using a sample of public service managers in Malaysia. Organizational learning was found positively related to organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and work performance. Organizational commitment and job satisfaction are also positively related with work performance and these variables partially mediate the relationship between organizational learning and work performance. Implication of the study and suggestions for future research been discussed in this paper.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.19030/jabr.v25i6.995

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 66 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Curry, J.P., Wakefield, D.S., Price, J.L., and Mueller, C.W. (1986). On the casual ordering on job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Academy of Management Journal. 29(4), 847-858.
  2. Davy, J., Kinichi, A. and Scheck, C. (1997). A test of job security's direct and mediated effects on withdrawal cognitions. Journal of Organisational Behaviour. 18, 323-349.
  3. Garver, C.R. (1996). Organizational learning climate, self-directed learner characteristics, and job performance among the police officers. Unpublished doctorial dissertation. The Pennsylvania State University.
  4. Grossberg, A.J. (2000). The effects of formal training on employment duration. Industrial Relations. 39(4), 578-588.
  5. Kontoghiorphes, C. and Bryant, N. (2004). Exploring employee commitment in a service organization in the health care insurance industry. Organizational Development Journal. 22(3), 59-74.
  6. Michaels, P. (1994). An expanded conceptual framework on organizational commitment and job satisfaction for sales force management. Journal of Business and Society. 7(1), 42-67.
  7. Nannully, J. (1978). Psychometric theory. (2 nd ed.), New York: McGraw-Hill.
  8. Suliman, A.M.T. (2002). The mediating role of organizational commitment in work climate-performance relationship. Journal of Management Development. 21(3), 170-183.
  9. Somers, M.J. and Birnbaum, D. (2000). Exploring the relationship between commitment profiles and work attitudes, employees withdrawal and job performance. Public Personnel Management. 29(3), 353-364.
  10. Wang, X. (2005). Relationship among organizational learning culture, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment in Chinese state-owned and privately-owned enterprises. Unpublished doctorial dissertation, University of Minnesota.
  11. Yang, B., Lim, T., McLean, G.N. (2003), "Impacts of organization's learning culture on job satisfaction and organizational commitment: a structural equation modeling approach", in Akaraborworn, C.T., Osman- Gani, A.M., McLean, G.N. (Eds),Human Resource Development in Asia: National Policy Perspectives, National Institute of Development Administration and Academy of Human Resource Development, Bangkok, pp.361-9.
  12. Yeo, R. (2002). Learning within organizations: linking the theoretical and empirical perspectives. Journal of Workplace Learning. 14(3), 109-122.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rose, R. C., Kumar, N., & Pak, O. G.
Affiliations
Universiti Putra Malaysia (MY)
Venue
Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR)
Published
2011-01-07
Volume
25
Issue
6
ISSN
  • 0892-7626 (ISSN-L)
  • 2157-8834
OpenAlex
W2157116138
Cited by
205
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 13
FWCI
21.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR) (publishedVersion)
  • Universiti Putra Malaysia Institutional Repository (Universiti Putra Malaysia) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Learning and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Employee Performance and Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Keywords
organizational learning, organizational commitment, job satisfaction, employee performance, public managers, mediating effect, public sector human resource management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review