PreprintCited by 76COVID-19 and Mental HealthHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum

Mental Health Status of University Healthcare Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Post-Movement Lockdown Assessment

Open access
Woon, Luke Sy-Cherng, Sidi, Hatta, Nik Jaafar, Nik Ruzyanei, Leong Bin Abdullah, Mohammad Farris Iman·2020·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

This study investigated the prevalence and severity of depression, anxiety, and stress and determined the association between various factors, social support, and depression and anxiety among university healthcare workers in Malaysia after the government lifted the movement control order (MCO) put in place to curb the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This online, cross-sectional survey recruited 399 participants from two university hospitals, and they were administered a self-reported questionnaire on demographic, personal, and clinical characteristics; COVID-19-related stressors; and coping. In addition, they completed the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) to measure perceived social support, as well as the 21-item Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS-21) to assess depression, anxiety, and stress. We found that the prevalence of depression, anxiety, and stress were 21.8%, 31.6%, and 29.1%, respectively. Participants with moderate to extremely severe depression, anxiety, and stress made up 13.3%, 25.8%, and 8.1% of the sample, respectively. Being single or divorced, fear of frequent exposure to COVID-19 patients, those who agreed that their area of living had a high prevalence of COVID-19 cases, and uncertainty regarding the prevalence of COVID-19 cases in the area of living were associated with higher odds of depression and anxiety. Conversely, having more than three children and greater perceived friend support were associated with lower odds of depression and anxiety. The prevalence of depression, anxiety, and stress remained elevated even after the MCO was lifted.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.20944/preprints202011.0422.v1

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The seroprevalence of COVID-19 among UMS front liners (8.3%) was higher than that in a previous Malaysian study involving only HCWs.

    “the seroprevalence of COVID-19 among UMS front liners was 8.3%, which was higher compared to a previous study carried out in Malaysia that only involved HCWs [42].”

    From Seroprevalence of COVID-19 and Psychological Distress among Front Liners at the Universiti Malaysia Sabah Campus during the Third Wave of COVID-19 (2022) · cites this paper as [42]

    The Methods (section 2.1; page unavailable) confirm that the cited paper studied healthcare workers at two Malaysian university hospitals. But its Discussion (section 4; page unavailable) reports mental-health outcomes, not COVID-19 seroprevalence, so it cannot support the comparison with UMS front liners’ 8.3% figure. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Woon, L. S.-C., Sidi, H., Nik Jaafar, N. R., & Leong Bin Abdullah, M. F. I.
Affiliations
University Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre (MY)
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-11-16
Volume
17
Issue
24
Pages
9155-9155
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3104263526
Cited by
76
References
40
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 29
FWCI
6.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Preprints.org (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Universiti Sains Malaysia (304/CIPPT/6315236)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Keywords
mental health, healthcare workers, university hospital, COVID-19 pandemic, Movement Control Order, depression, anxiety, stress, perceived social support, coping
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Anxiety, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Health Personnel, Humans, Mental Health, Stress, Psychological, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review