Cited by 136Smoking Behavior and CessationAir Quality and Health ImpactsAcute Myocardial Infarction Research

Hospital Admissions for Acute Myocardial Infarction, Angina, Stroke, and Asthma After Implementation of Arizona's Comprehensive Statewide Smoking Ban

Open access
Herman, Patricia M., Walsh, Michele E.·2011·American Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Objectives. We examined the impact of Arizona's May 2007 comprehensive statewide smoking ban on hospital admissions for diagnoses for which there is evidence of a causal relationship with secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure (acute myocardial infarction [AMI], angina, stroke, and asthma). Methods. We compared monthly hospital admissions from January 2004 through May 2008 for these primary diagnoses and 4 diagnoses not associated with SHS (appendicitis, kidney stones, acute cholecystitis, and ulcers) for Arizona counties with preexisting county or municipal smoking bans and counties with no previous bans. We attributed reductions in admissions to the statewide ban if they occurred only in diagnoses associated with SHS and if they were larger in counties with no previous bans. We analyzed the data with Poisson regressions, controlling for seasonality and admissions trends. We also estimated cost savings. Results. Statistically significant reductions in hospital admissions were seen for AMI, angina, stroke, and asthma in counties with no previous bans over what was seen in counties with previous bans. No ban variable coefficients were statistically significant for diagnoses not associated with SHS. Conclusions. Arizona's statewide smoking ban decreased hospital admissions for AMI, stroke, asthma, and angina.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2105/ajph.2009.179572

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Herman, P. M., & Walsh, M. E.
Affiliations
University of Arizona (US)
Venue
American Journal of Public Health
Published
2011-03
Volume
101
Issue
3
Pages
491-496
ISSN
  • 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0048
OpenAlex
W2172000863
Cited by
136
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 21
FWCI
11.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Arizona Department of Health Services
  • Bureau of Tobacco and Chronic Disease
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
Keywords
smoking bans, passive smoking, acute myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, stroke, asthma, hospitalization, tobacco control, cost reduction
MeSH terms
Angina Pectoris, Arizona, Asthma, Female, Humans, Male, Myocardial Infarction, Patient Admission, Seasons, Tobacco Smoke Pollution, Causality, Poisson Distribution, Cost Savings, Health Care Costs, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review