Cited by 160Racial and Ethnic Identity ResearchSocial and Intergroup PsychologyCultural Competency in Health Care

Assessment of Biases Against Latinos and African Americans Among Primary Care Providers and Community Members

Open access
Blair, Irene V., Havranek, Edward P., Price, David W., Hanratty, Rebecca, Fairclough, Diane L., Farley, Tillman, Hirsh, Holen K., Steiner, John F.·2013·American Journal of Public Health

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We assessed implicit and explicit bias against both Latinos and African Americans among experienced primary care providers (PCPs) and community members (CMs) in the same geographic area. METHODS: Two hundred ten PCPs and 190 CMs from 3 health care organizations in the Denver, Colorado, metropolitan area completed Implicit Association Tests and self-report measures of implicit and explicit bias, respectively. RESULTS: With a 60% participation rate, the PCPs demonstrated substantial implicit bias against both Latinos and African Americans, but this was no different from CMs. Explicit bias was largely absent in both groups. Adjustment for background characteristics showed the PCPs had slightly weaker ethnic/racial bias than CMs. CONCLUSIONS: This research provided the first evidence of implicit bias against Latinos in health care, as well as confirming previous findings of implicit bias against African Americans. Lack of substantive differences in bias between the experienced PCPs and CMs suggested a wider societal problem. At the same time, the wide range of implicit bias suggested that bias in health care is neither uniform nor inevitable, and important lessons might be learned from providers who do not exhibit bias.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2105/ajph.2012.300812

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The only three studies conducted in naturalistic settings combined the IAT with measures of physician-patient interaction.

    “The only three studies conducted in naturalistic settings combined the IAT with measures of physician-patient interaction [22–24].”

    From Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: a systematic review (2017) · cites this paper as [22]

    The Methods (Participants and Procedure; Measures) describe recruiting primary care providers from clinical practices and administering IATs. But the study measured bias and explicit attitudes, not physician–patient interactions; it also does not establish that there were only three such studies. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. [2]CDC Health Disparities and Inequalities Report – United States, 2011 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention MMWR Supplement 60 1 14 2011 21430612
  2. [3]Committee on the Review and Assessment of the NIH’s Strategic Research Plan and Budget to Reduce and Ultimately Eliminate Health Disparities Examining the Health Disparities Research Plan of the National Institutes of Health: Unfinished Business Washington, DC National Academy Press 2006
  3. [7]Smedley BD Stith AY Nelson AR Committee on Understanding and Eliminating Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care, Institute of Medicine Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care Washington, DC National Academy Press 2003 25032386
  4. [11]Bobo L Smelser N Wilson WJ Mitchell F Racial attitudes and relations at the close of the twentieth century America Becoming: Racial Trends and their Consequences Washington, DC National Academy Press 2001 262 299
  5. [15]Greenwald AG Poehlman TA Uhlmann E Banaji MR Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-Analysis of Predictive Validity J Pers Soc Psychol 2009 97 17 41 19586237
  6. [18]Greenwald AG McGhee DE Schwarz JLK Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test J Pers Soc Psychol 1998 74 1464 1480 9654756
  7. [19]Lane KA Banaji MR Nosek BA Greenwald AG Wittenbrink B Schwarz N Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: IV: What we know (so far) about the method Implicit Measures of Attitudes New York, NY, US Guilford Press 2007 59 102
  8. [21]Nosek BA Greenwald AG Banaji MR Understanding and using the implicit association test: II. method variables and construct validity Pers Soc Psychol B 2005 31 166 180 15619590
  9. [22]Nosek BA Greenwald AG Banaji MR Bargh JA The Implicit Association Test at age 7: A methodological and conceptual review Social Psychology and the Unconscious: The Automaticity of Higher Mental Processes Psychology Press 2007 265 292
  10. [23]Beach MC Sugarman J Johnson RL Arbelaez JJ Duggan PS Cooper LA Do patients treated with dignity report higher satisfaction, adherence, and receipt of preventive care? Ann Fam Med 2005 3 331 338 16046566 PMC1466898
  11. [24]Safran DG Taira DA Rogers WH Kosinski M Ware JE Tarlov AR Linking primary care performance to outcomes of care J Fam Pract 1998 47 213 220 9752374
  12. [25]Thom DH Ribisl KM Stewart AL Luke DA Further validation and reliability testing of the trust in physician scale. The Stanford Trust Study Physicians Med Care 1999 37 510 517 10335753
  13. [26]Schneider J Kaplan SH Greenfield S Li W Wilson IB Better physician-patient relationships are associated with higher reported adherence to antiretroviral therapy in patients with HIV infection J Gen Intern Med 2004 19 1096 1103 15566438 PMC1494791
  14. [27]Doescher MP Saver BG Franks P Fiscella K Racial and ethnic disparities in perceptions of physician style and trust Arch Fam Med 2000 9 1156 1163 11115223
  15. [28]Safran DG Montgomery JE Chang H Murphy J Rogers WH Switching doctors: Predictors of voluntary disenrollment from a primary physician’s practice J Fam Pract 2001 50 130 136 11219560
  16. [29]Green AR Carney DR Pallin DJ Implicit bias among physicians and its prediction of thrombolysis decisions for black and white patients J Gen Intern Med 2007 22 1231 8 17594129 PMC2219763
  17. [30]Sabin JA Nosek BA Greenwald AG Rivara FP Physicians’ implicit and explicit attitudes about race by MD race, ethnicity and gender JHCPU 2009 20 896 913 PMC3320738 19648715
  18. [31]Sabin JA Rivara FP Greenwald AG Physician implicit attitudes and stereotypes about race and quality of medical care Med Care 2008 46 678 685 18580386
  19. [32]White-Means S Dong A Hufstader M Brown LT Cultural competency, race, and skin tone bias among pharmacy, nursing, and medical students: Implications for addressing health disparities Med Care Res Rev 2009 66 436 455 19369696
  20. [33]Penner LA Dovidio JF West TV Gaertner SL Albrecht TL Dailey RK Markova Aversive racism and medical interactions with Black patients: A field study J Exp Soc Psychol 2009 46 436 440 20228874 PMC2835170
  21. [34]Haider AH Sexton J Sriram N Association of unconscious race and social class bias with vignette–based clinical assessments by medical students JAMA 2011 306 9 942 951 21900134 PMC3684149
  22. [35]Blair IV Steiner JF Havranek EP Unconscious (implicit) bias and health disparities: Where do we go from here? Perm J 2011 15 2 71 78 21841929 PMC3140753
  23. [37]De Houwer J Teige-Mocigemba S Spruyt A Moors A 2009 Implicit measures: A normative analysis and review Psychol Bull 135 347 368 19379018
  24. [38]Blair IV Judd CM Havranek EP Steiner JF Using community data to test the discriminant validity of ethnic/racial group IATs J of Psychol 2010 218 36 43 PMC3882026 24404433
  25. [41]Greenwald AG Nosek BA Banaji MR Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm J Pers Soc Psychol 2003 85 197 216 12916565
  26. [43]Burgess DJ Are providers more likely to contribute to healthcare disparities under high levels of cognitive load? How features of the healthcare setting may lead to biases in medical decision making Med Decis Making 2010 30 246 257 19726783 PMC3988900

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blair, I. V., Havranek, E. P., Price, D. W., Hanratty, R., Fairclough, D. L., Farley, T., Hirsh, H. K., & Steiner, J. F.
Affiliations
Kaiser Permanente (US)
Venue
American Journal of Public Health
Published
2013-01
Volume
103
Issue
1
Pages
92-98
ISSN
  • 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0048
OpenAlex
W2145320067
Cited by
160
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 3
FWCI
21.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Kaiser Permanente
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R21HL089623, HL089623, HL088198, R01HL088198)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
Keywords
implicit bias, explicit bias, Hispanic Americans, African Americans, primary care providers, community members, racial bias in medicine, Implicit Association Test, health disparities, Denver
MeSH terms
Workforce, Adolescent, Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Black or African American, Colorado, Female, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Physician-Patient Relations, Primary Health Care, Stereotyped Behavior, Health Care Surveys, Young Adult, Racism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review