Cited by 4,570Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchSystemic Sclerosis and Related DiseasesMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies

Derivation of the sledai. A disease activity index for lupus patients

Bombardier, Claire, Gladman, Dafna D., Urowitz, Murray B., Caron, Dominique, Chang, Chi Hsing, Austin, A., Bell, A., Bloch, Daniel A. +14 more·1992·Arthritis & Rheumatism

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To standardize outcome measures in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Three indices were identified which could adequately describe outcome (disease activity, damage from disease, and health status); we describe here the development of the Disease Activity Index. METHODS: Twenty-four variables were identified as important factors in a disease activity index. These were used to generate 574 patient profiles, which were rated on a disease activity scale of 0-10 by 14 rheumatologists. A second rating of 10 of the profiles yielded scores that were not significantly different from the first, indicating that experienced clinicians can reliably make global estimates of disease activity. Multiple regression models were used to estimate the relative importance of the 24 clinical variables in the physicians' global rating of disease activity. These were estimated on a "training set" of 75% of physicians' ratings, and then validated on a "testing set," consisting of the remaining 25% of physicians' ratings. RESULTS: The explanatory power of the models in the training set was high (R2 = 0.93). The models' regression coefficients for the organ systems were simplified for easier use in clinical practice. This generated a "weighted" index of 9 organ systems for disease activity in SLE, the SLEDAI, as follows: 8 for central nervous system and vascular, 4 for renal and musculoskeletal, 2 for serosal, dermal, immunologic, and 1 for constitutional and hematologic. The maximum theoretical score is 105, but in practice, few patients have scores greater than 45. The SLEDAI predicted well the physicians' ratings in the testing set (Pearson's correlation coefficients = 0.64-0.79). CONCLUSION: The SLEDAI is a validated model of experienced clinicians' global assessments of disease activity in lupus. It represents the consensus of a group of experts in the field of lupus research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.1780350606

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bombardier, C., Gladman, D. D., Urowitz, M. B., Caron, D., Chang, C. H., Austin, A., Bell, A., Bloch, D. A., Corey, P. N., Decker, J. L., Esdaile, J., Fries, J. F., Ginzler, E. M., Goldsmith, C. H., Hochberg, M. C., Jones, J. V., Riche, N. G. H. L., Liang, M. H., Lockshin, M. D., Muenz, L. R., Sackett, D. L., & Schur, P. H.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Bombardier, Claire
Venue
Arthritis & Rheumatism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1992-06
Volume
35
Issue
6
Pages
630-640
ISSN
  • 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-0131
OpenAlex
W2064999867
Cited by
4,570
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 83 · 2025: 103 · 2024: 157 · 2023: 130 · 2022: 174 · 2021: 178 · 2020: 192 · 2019: 178 · 2018: 200 · 2017: 184 · 2016: 182 · 2015: 214 · 2014: 232 · 2013: 198 · 2012: 185
FWCI
22.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Arthritis & Rheumatism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Keywords
systemic lupus erythematosus, SLEDAI, disease activity index, disease activity assessment, outcome measures, clinical rating scales
MeSH terms
Central Nervous System, Humans, Immune System, Individuality, Kidney, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic, Musculoskeletal System, Severity of Illness Index, Skin, Vasculitis, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review