The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Self-supervised learning of accelerometer data provides new insights for sleep and its association with mortality
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1038/s41746-024-01065-0 · Paper page
Abstract
Sleep is essential to life. Accurate measurement and classification of sleep/wake and sleep stages is important in clinical studies for sleep disorder diagnoses and in the interpretation of data from consumer devices for monitoring physical and mental well-being. Existing non-polysomnography sleep classification techniques mainly rely on heuristic methods developed in relatively small cohorts. Thus, we aimed to establish the accuracy of wrist-worn accelerometers for sleep stage classification and subsequently describe the association between sleep duration and efficiency (proportion of total time asleep when in bed) with mortality outcomes. We developed a self-supervised deep neural network for sleep stage classification using concurrent laboratory-based polysomnography and accelerometry. After exclusion, 1,448 participant nights of data were used for training. The difference between polysomnography and the model classifications on the external validation was 34.7 minutes (95% limits of agreement (LoA): -37.8 to 107.2 minutes) for total sleep duration, 2.6 minutes for REM duration (95% LoA: -68.4 to 73.4 minutes) and 32.1 minutes (95% LoA: -54.4 to 118.5 minutes) for NREM duration. The sleep classifier was deployed in the UK Biobank with ~100,000 participants to study the association of sleep duration and sleep efficiency with all-cause mortality. Among 66,214 UK Biobank participants, 1,642 mortality events were observed. Short sleepers (<6 hours) had a higher risk of mortality compared to participants with normal sleep duration (6 to 7.9 hours), regardless of whether they had low sleep efficiency (Hazard ratios (HRs): 1.69; 95% confidence intervals (CIs): 1.28 to 2.24 ) or high sleep efficiency (HRs: 1.42; 95% CIs: 1.14 to 1.77). Deep-learning-based sleep classification using accelerometers has a fair to moderate agreement with polysomnography. Our findings suggest that having short overnight sleep confers mortality risk irrespective of sleep continuity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946
A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research
Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016) · Journal of Chiropractic Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012 · Cited by 31,709
GWAS identifies 14 loci for device-measured physical activity and sleep duration
Doherty, A., Smith-Byrne, K., Ferreira, T., Holmes, M. V., Holmes, C., Pulit, S. L., & Lindgren, C. M. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07743-4 · Cited by 408
Self-citationWang, C., Bangdiwala, S. I., Rangarajan, S., Lear, S. A., AlHabib, K. F., Mohan, V., Teo, K., Poirier, P., TSE, L. A., Liu, Z., et al. (2019) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehy695 · Cited by 385
Circadian rhythms and disorders of the timing of sleep
Meyer, N., Harvey, A. G., Lockley, S. W., & Dijk, D.-J. (2022) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(22)00877-7 · Cited by 346
Mantua, J., Gravel, N., & Spencer, R. (2016) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s16050646 · Cited by 314
Genetic studies of accelerometer-based sleep measures yield new insights into human sleep behaviour
Jones, S. E., van Hees, V. T., Mazzotti, D. R., Marques-Vidal, P., Sabia, S., van der Spek, A., Dashti, H. S., Engmann, J., Kocevska, D., Tyrrell, J., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09576-1 · Cited by 300
Self-citationWilletts, M., Hollowell, S., Aslett, L., Holmes, C., & Doherty, A. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-26174-1 · Cited by 250
Self-citationWalmsley, R., Chan, S., Smith-Byrne, K., Ramakrishnan, R., Woodward, M., Rahimi, K., Dwyer, T., Bennett, D., & Doherty, A. (2022) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2021-104050 · Cited by 238
Self-citationSelf-supervised learning for human activity recognition using 700,000 person-days of wearable data
Yuan, H., Chan, S., Creagh, A. P., Tong, C., Acquah, A., Clifton, D. A., & Doherty, A. (2024) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-024-01062-3 · Cited by 166
Self-citationAutomating sleep stage classification using wireless, wearable sensors
Boe, A. J., McGee Koch, L. L., O’Brien, M. K., Shawen, N., Rogers, J. A., Lieber, R. L., Reid, K. J., Zee, P. C., & Jayaraman, A. (2019) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-019-0210-1 · Cited by 98
40 years of actigraphy in sleep medicine and current state of the art algorithms
Patterson, M. R., Nunes, A. A. S., Gerstel, D., Pilkar, R., Guthrie, T., Neishabouri, A., & Guo, C. C. (2023) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-023-00802-1 · Cited by 91
Katori, M., Shi, S., Ode, K. L., Tomita, Y., & Ueda, H. R. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2116729119 · Cited by 75
Wainberg, M., Jones, S. E., Beaupre, L. M., Hill, S. L., Felsky, D., Rivas, M. A., Lim, A. S. P., Ollila, H. M., & Tripathy, S. J. (2021) · PLOS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1003782 · Cited by 64
Liang, Y. Y., Ai, S., Xue, H., Chen, Y., Zhou, J., Shu, X., Weng, F., Zhou, M., Ma, H., Zhang, J., et al. (2023) · The Journals of Gerontology: Series A · doi:10.1093/gerona/glad108 · Cited by 33
Devine, J. K., Chinoy, E. D., Markwald, R. R., Schwartz, L. P., & Hursh, S. R. (2020) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21010076 · Cited by 32
Migueles, J. H., Molina-Garcia, P., Torres-Lopez, L. V., Cadenas-Sanchez, C., Rowlands, A. V., Ebner-Priemer, U. W., Koch, E. D., Reif, A., & Ortega, F. B. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-09469-2 · Cited by 22
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Metadata
- Authors
- Doherty, A., Yuan, H., Plekhanova, T., Walmsley, R., Reynolds, A., Maddison, K., Bucan, M., Gehrman, P., Rowlands, A., Ray, D., Bennett, D., McVeigh, J., Straker, L., Eastwood, P., & Kyle, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- University of Leicester (GB)
- Flinders University (AU)
- The University of Western Australia (AU)
- University of Pennsylvania
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- John Radcliffe Hospital (GB)
- Curtin University (AU)
- Murdoch University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Doherty, Aiden
- ORCID
- Venue
- Research Square
- Published
- 2023-09-18
- OpenAlex
- W4386838001
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 17
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- dx.doi.org
- Locations
- Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Health and Medical Research Council
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
- Keywords
- sleep stage classification, wrist-worn accelerometers, self-supervised learning, deep neural network, polysomnography validation, sleep duration, sleep efficiency, all-cause mortality, short sleepers, REM sleep, NREM sleep, UK Biobank, sleep monitoring
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review