The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Silage Science and Technology
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“confirming that yeast species require a certain oxygen level for anaerobic alcohol production [23,27].”
From Influence of Ensiling Timing and Inoculation on Whole Plant Maize Silage Fermentation and Aerobic Stability (Preliminary Research) (2024) · cites this paper as [27]
In the citing paper
“Strains belonging to the genus Streptococcus, Lactococcus, and Leuconostoc were also identified in silage [7].”
In the citing paper
“Although Leuconostocaceae species have been reported to be more sensitive to low pH [7], they still represented around 4% of the population in the Control and LB treated silage at the end of the second bacterial population succession, after 16 days of fermentation.”
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Silage review: Interpretation of chemical, microbial, and organoleptic components of silages
Kung, L., Shaver, R. D., Grant, R. J., & Schmidt, R. J. (2018) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2017-13909 · Cited by 1,316
Silage review: Recent advances and future uses of silage additives
Muck, R. E., Nadeau, E. M. G., McAllister, T. A., Contreras-Govea, F. E., Santos, M. C., & Kung, L. (2018) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2017-13839 · Cited by 1,038
Pahlow, G., Muck, R. E., Driehuis, F., Elferink, S. J. W. H. O., & Spoelstra, S. F. (2003) · Agronomy Monographs · doi:10.2134/agronmonogr42.c2 · Cited by 877
Silage review: Factors affecting dry matter and quality losses in silages
Borreani, G., Tabacco, E., Schmidt, R. J., Holmes, B. J., & Muck, R. E. (2018) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2017-13837 · Cited by 802
Silage microbiology and its control through additives
Muck, R. E. (2010) · Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia · doi:10.1590/s1516-35982010001300021 · Cited by 543
Metadata
- Venue
- Agronomy Monographs
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-01
- ISSN
- 0065-4663 (ISSN-L)
- 2156-3276
- OpenAlex
- W598038682
- Cited by
- 881
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 78 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 56 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 35
- FWCI
- 30.93
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Agronomy monograph/Agronomy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Agricultural Engineering and Mechanization
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agricultural Productivity and Crop Improvement
- Keywords
- silage, silage making, forage preservation, silage additives, silage fermentation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
