The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Wheat Yield Progress Associated with Higher Stomatal Conductance and Photosynthetic Rate, and Cooler Canopies
Abstract
Grain yields of eight representative semidwarf spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars released in northwest Mexico between 1962 and 1988 have increased linearly across years as measured in this region during 6 yr under favorable management and irrigation. To understand the physiological basis of this progress and possibly assist future selection for grain yield, leaf traits were determined during 3 yr in the same study. Stomatal conductance (gs), maximum photosynthetic rate (A max, and canopy temperature depression (CTD), averaged over the 3 yr, were closely and positively correlated with progress in the 6‐yr mean yield. The correlation was greatest with gs (r = 0.94, P < 0.01). Compared with the overall yield increase of 27%, gs increased 63%, A max increased 23%, and canopies were 0.6°C cooler. Carbon‐13 isotope discrimination was also positively associated with yield progress (r = 0.71, P < 0.05), but other leaf traits such as flag leaf area, specific leaf weight, percentage N and greeness were not, nor was crop growth rate around anthesis. The causal basis of the leaf activity interrelationships is reasonably clear, with both increased intercellular CO 2 concentration and increased mesophyll activity contributing to the increase in A max. However, causal links to the yield progress, and the accompanying increase in kernels per square meter, are not clear. It is concluded that g s and CTD should be further investigated as potential indirect selection criteria for yield.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For example, a positive association of P N with drought tolerance has been reported in different crops, e.g., semi-dwarf spring wheat (Fischer et al. 1998), maize (Ashraf et al. 2007), transgenic lines of rice (Garg et al. 2002), and transgenic cotton lines (Yan et al. 2004).”
From Photosynthesis under stressful environments: An overview (2013) · cites this paper as Fischer et al. 1998
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 754
Water use efficiency and associated traits in winter wheat cultivars in the North China Plain
Zhang, X., Chen, S., Sun, H., Wang, Y., & Shao, L. (2009) · Agricultural Water Management · doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2009.06.003 · Cited by 158
Automated measurement of canopy stomatal conductance based on infrared temperature
Blonquist, J. M., Norman, J., & Bugbee, B. (2009) · doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.10.003 · Cited by 159
“Previous studies have related crop yield to stomatal conductance of water vapor (Fischer et al., 1998; Lu et al., 1998).”
BackgroundExploiting natural variation and genetic manipulation of stomatal conductance for crop improvement
Faralli, M., Matthews, J. S. A., & Lawson, T. (2019) · Current opinion in plant biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2019.01.003 · Cited by 158
Bunce, J. A. (2000) · Photosynthesis Research · doi:10.1023/a:1006325724086 · Cited by 162
Genetic variation in tolerance to the osmotic stress componentof salinity stress in durum wheat.
James, R. A., von Caemmerer, S., Condon, A., Zwart, A., & Munns, R. (2008) · Functional Plant Biology · doi:10.1071/fp07234 · Cited by 156
Self-citationMcKay, J., Richards, J. H., Nemali, K., Sen, Ś., Mitchell‐Olds, T., Boles, S. B., Stahl, E. A., Wayne, T. L., & Juenger, T. (2008) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00474.x · Cited by 126
“In contrast, wheat cultivars with high yield under irrigation environments show reduced WUE, resulting largely from constitutively higher stomatal conductance (Fischer et al. 1998).”
BackgroundStomatal Conductance Is Essential for Higher Yield Potential of C 3 Crops
Roche, D. (2015) · Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences · doi:10.1080/07352689.2015.1023677 · Cited by 182
Yang, X., Chen, X., Ge, Q., Li, B., Tong, Y., Zhang, A., Li, Z., Kuang, T., & Lu, C. (2006) · Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2006.04.010 · Cited by 151
Monneveux, P., Reynolds, M. P., Trethowan, R. M., González-Santoyo, H. I., Peña, R. J., & Zapata, F. (2004) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/j.eja.2004.03.001 · Cited by 138
Impacts, Tolerance, Adaptation, and Mitigation of Heat Stress on Wheat under Changing Climates
Yadav, M. R., Choudhary, M., Singh, J., Lal, M. K., Jha, P. K., Udawat, P., Gupta, N. K., Rajput, V. D., GARG, N. K., Maheshwari, C., et al. (2022) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms23052838 · Cited by 187
“Phenotypic correlations of CTD with grain yield were occasionally positive [130,131].”
BackgroundPhenotyping for abiotic stress tolerance in maize.
Masuka, B., Araus, J., Das, B., Sonder, K., & Cairns, J. (2012) · Journal of Integrative Plant Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-7909.2012.01118.x · Cited by 144
Methodology for High-Throughput Field Phenotyping of Canopy Temperature Using Airborne Thermography
Deery, D. M., Rebetzke, G. J., Jiménez-Berni, J. A., James, R. A., Condon, A. G., Bovill, W. D., Hutchinson, P., Scarrow, J., Davy, R. J., & Furbank, R. T. (2016) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2016.01808 · Cited by 155
Self-citationOpinion: Prospects for improving photosynthesis by altering leaf anatomy
Tholen, D., Boom, C., & Zhu, X. (2012) · Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2012.09.005 · Cited by 151
Balota, M., Payne, W., Evett, S., & Lazar, M. (2007) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci2006.06.0383 · Cited by 141
“…for CTD measurement include “full sunshine” (Ayeneh et al., 2002), “clear days” (Blum et al., 1989; Idso et al., 1984), “cloudless days/periods” (Fischer et al., 1998; Rashid et al., 1999), “sunny days” (Royo et al., 2002), “clear sky and cloudy or shaded conditions” (Idso, 1982), “most…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPhotoperiod sensitivity during stem elongation as an avenue to raise potential yield in wheat
Slafer, G., Abeledo, L., Miralles, D., González, F. G., & Whitechurch, E. (2001) · Euphytica · doi:10.1023/a:1017535632171 · Cited by 141
Beche, E., Benin, G., da Silva, C. L., Munaro, L. B., & Marchese, J. A. (2014) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/j.eja.2014.08.005 · Cited by 159
de Souza, A. P., Wang, Y., Orr, D. J., Carmo‐Silva, E., & Long, S. P. (2019) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.16142 · Cited by 151
“Slow 509 stomatal opening during induction can significantly affect the CO2 uptake and have a cumulative 510 effect over the growing season, lowering yields (Reynolds et al., 1994; Fisher et al., 1998; Lawson 511 & Blatt, 2014).”
Breeding crops for reduced-tillage management in the intensive, rice–wheat systems of South Asia
Joshi, A. K., Chand, R., Arun, B., Singh, R., & Ortiz, R. (2006) · Euphytica · doi:10.1007/s10681-006-9249-6 · Cited by 138
“Several studies suggest new physiological tools can complement conventional wheat breeding programs (Fischer et al. 1998; Reynolds et al. 1998), helping to select important traits which are difficult to quantify in breeding materials and to target highly heritable traits that limit yield (Richards…”
BackgroundBeres, B. L., Rahmani, E., Clarke, J. M., Grassini, P., Pozniak, C. J., Geddes, C. M., Porker, K. D., May, W. E., & Ransom, J. K. (2020) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2020.568657 · Cited by 160
An assessment of wheat yield sensitivity and breeding gains in hot environments
Gourdji, S., Mathews, K. L., Reynolds, M. P., Crossa, J. L., & Lobell, D. B. (2012) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2012.2190 · Cited by 139
“This result agrees with past observations that yields in hot, low-humidity environments are strongly positively correlated with stomatal conductance and canopy temperature depression [17–19].”
ResultFood security: increasing yield and improving resource use efficiency
Parry, M., & Hawkesford, M. (2010) · Proceedings of the Nutrition Society · doi:10.1017/s0029665110003836 · Cited by 136
“P ro ce ed in gs o f th e N u tr it io n So ci et y There is some evidence from work on historic wheat genotypes which suggests that improvements in photosynthesis per unit leaf area have already occurred((8,9)).”
BackgroundCabrera‐Bosquet, L., Molero, G., Bort, J., Nogués, S., & Araus, J. L. (2007) · Annals of Applied Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-7348.2007.00195.x · Cited by 128
Rahman, M. A., Chikushi, J., Yoshida, S., & Karim, A. (1970) · Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research · doi:10.3329/bjar.v34i3.3961 · Cited by 128
“Genotypic difference in green leaf area duration in response to heat stress is also reported by Stone and Nicolas (1998); and Fisher et al. (1998).”
BackgroundMurchie, E., Yang, J.-C., Hubbart, S., Horton, P., & Peng, S. (2002) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erf064 · Cited by 132
“Recently, it has been shown that higher yields in wheat were associated with a higher light-saturated rate of leaf photosynthesis (Pmax) (Fischer et al., 1998).”
Naghavi, M., Aboughadareh, A. P., & Khalili, M. (2013) · Notulae Scientia Biologicae · doi:10.15835/nsb539049 · Cited by 131
“…percentage (SSPI), Modified stress tolerance index (KiSTI), were calculated using the following relationships (Fischer and Maurer, 1978; Fischer et al., 1998; Fernandez, 1992; Rosielle and Hamblin, 1981; Bouslama and Schapaugh, 1984; Blum, 1988; Moosavi et al., 2008; Farshadfar and…”
Tshikunde, N. M., Mashilo, J., Shimelis, H., & Odindo, A. O. (2019) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.01428 · Cited by 174
Balota, M., Payne, W. A., Evett, S. R., & Peters, R. T. (2008) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci2007.06.0317 · Cited by 119
“…et al., 1998; Merah et al., 2001; Monneveux et al., 2005; Tokatlidis et al., 2004), especially in more recently developed wheat cultivars (Royo et al., 2002) for which stomatal conductance (gs) tends to be less sensitive to incipient leaf water stress (Fischer et al., 1998; Ortelli et al., 1996).”
BackgroundInfluentialEnhancing wheat production- A global perspective
Sharma, I., Tyagi, B. S., SINGH, G., Venkatesh, K., & Gupta, O. P. (2015) · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences · doi:10.56093/ijas.v85i1.45935 · Cited by 146
Physiological performance of synthetic hexaploid wheat-derived populations
del Blanco, I. D., Rajaram, S., Kronstad, W., & Reynolds, M. (1999) · doi:10.2135/cropsci2000.4051257x · Cited by 121
Gao, F., Ma, D., Yin, G., Rasheed, A., Dong, Y., Xiao, Y., Xia, X., Wu, X., & He, Z. (2017) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci2016.05.0362 · Cited by 133
“Fischer et al. (1998) showed that genetic gain in grain yield was associated with CTD at the grain filling stage for CIMMYT semidwarf cultivars released from 1962 to 1988.”
BackgroundInfra-Red Thermography as a High-Throughput Tool for Field Phenotyping
Prashar, A., & Jones, H. (2014) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy4030397 · Cited by 117
Stable isotopes in archaeobotanical research
Fiorentino, G., Ferrio, J., Bogaard, A., Araus, J., & Riehl, S. (2014) · Vegetation History and Archaeobotany · doi:10.1007/s00334-014-0492-9 · Cited by 117
“This translates into a lower stomatal limitation of photosynthesis, and thus a higher D(13)C (with differences of up to 1 %) than traditional landraces (Fischer et al. 1998; Muñoz et al. 1998; Zhao et al. 2001; Araus et al. 2003a, 2007; Slafer et al. 2005).”
BackgroundLee, S., Chung, G., Jang, J.-Y., Ahn, S., & Zwiazek, J. (2012) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.112.194506 · Cited by 116
Koester, R. P., Nohl, B. M., Diers, B. W., & Ainsworth, E. A. (2015) · Plant Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/pce.12675 · Cited by 136
“…greater CO2 uptake and transpirational water use through greater gs. Similar results of increased gs in modern cultivars have been found previously within historical soybean (Morrison et al. 1999; Lui et al. 2012) and wheat (Fischer et al. 1998; Zheng et al. 2011; Sadras & Lawson 2011) germplasm.”
Lu, D., Lu, F., Pan, J.-X., Cui, Z., Zou, C.-Q., Chen, X.-P., He, M.-R., & Wang, Z. (2015) · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2014.10.012 · Cited by 114
Pauli, D., Andrade-Sánchez, P., Carmo‐Silva, E., Gazave, É., French, A. N., Heun, J. T., Hunsaker, D. J., Lipka, A. E., Setter, T. L., Strand, R. J., et al. (2016) · G3 Genes Genomes Genetics · doi:10.1534/g3.115.023515 · Cited by 118
“…both QTL imply a reduction in the preferential usage of 12C over 13C, along with a concomitant increase in canopy temperature, which would result from limited gas exchange between leaf intercellular airspaces and the atmosphere due to stomatal closure (Fischer et al. 1998; Farquhar et al. 1982).”
BackgroundRehman, A., Malhotra, R., Bett, K., Tar'an, B., Bueckert, R., & Warkentin, T. (2011) · doi:10.2135/cropsci2010.03.0129 · Cited by 113
Review: High-throughput phenotyping to enhance the use of crop genetic resources
Rebetzke, G. J., Jiménez-Berni, J. A., Fischer, R. A., Deery, D. M., & Smith, D. (2018) · Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2018.06.017 · Cited by 126
Self-citationStomataCounter: a neural network for automatic stomata identification and counting
Fetter, K. C., Eberhardt, S., Barclay, R., Wing, S. L., & Keller, S. R. (2019) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.15892 · Cited by 123
“At the molecular level, regulation of stomata has been the subject of numerous genetic studies (see Shimazaki et al. , 2007 and (Kim et al. , 2010) for detailed reviews) and crop improvement programs have modified stomata phenotypes to increases yield (Fischer et al. , 1998).”
BackgroundTian, Z., Jing, Q., Dai, T., Jiang, D., & Cao, W. (2011) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2011.07.012 · Cited by 116
The impact of drought on the productivity of two rainfed crops in Spain
Peña-Gallardo, M., Vicente-Serrano, S., Domínguez-Castro, F., & Beguerı́a, S. (2019) · Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences · doi:10.5194/nhess-19-1215-2019 · Cited by 110
“Although the transpiration coefficient for barley is higher, this crop is not as subject as wheat to water stress under drought conditions (Fischer et al., 1998).”
BackgroundProjecting Yield and Utilization Potential of Switchgrass as an Energy Crop
Mclaughlin, S., Kiniry, J., Taliaferro, C., & Ugarte, D. G. D. L. T. (2006) · Advances in agronomy · doi:10.1016/s0065-2113(06)90007-8 · Cited by 110
“Unlike the increasing harvest index values that have tracked the trend in yield gains in some of the cereal grains, such as wheat (Fischer et al., 1998), the harvest index of maize has remained largely unchanged (Tollenaar, 1989).”
BackgroundBridging the Rice Yield Gaps under Drought: QTLs, Genes, and their Use in Breeding Programs
Sandhu, N., & Kumar, A. (2017) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy7020027 · Cited by 109
“Stomatal conductance, maximal rates of photosynthesis [100], and developmental plasticity [101] were reported to be positively correlated, whereas leaf temperatures were negatively correlated with yield increase under stress in semi-dwarf spring wheat cultivars [100].”
BackgroundSemenov, M. A., & Stratonovitch, P. (2015) · Climate Research · doi:10.3354/cr01297 · Cited by 122
Kant, S., Seneweera, S. P., Rodin, J., Materne, M., Burch, D., Rothstein, S. J., & SPANGENBERG, G. C. (2012) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2012.00162 · Cited by 140
“There is mounting evidence that the yield potential of many crops is limited by their capacity to exploit sufficient C during their lifecycle, limiting grain size and quantity (Fischer et al., 1998).”
BackgroundNehe, A., Misra, S., Murchie, E., Chinnathambi, K., Tyagi, B. S., & Foulkes, M. (2020) · Field crops research (Print) · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2020.107778 · Cited by 108
“Genetic variation in flag-leaf photosynthesis rate was associated with grain yield in eight spring wheat cultivars in Mexico (Fischer et al., 1998), in 18 winter wheat cultivars in China (Jiang et al., 2003) and in 18 facultative wheat cultivars in China (Zheng et al., 2011a, 2011b).”
BackgroundPhysiological and growth responses to water deficit in the bioenergy crop Miscanthus x giganteus
Ings, J. S., Mur, L. A. J., Robson, P. R. H., & Bosch, M. (2013) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2013.00468 · Cited by 98
Physiological traits and cereal germplasm for sustainable agricultural systems
Richards, R. A., Watt, M., & Rebetzke, G. J. (2006) · Euphytica · doi:10.1007/s10681-006-9286-1 · Cited by 102
“Instruments are available to rapidly measure stomatal aperture traits in a breeding programme so as to identify water profligate genotypes (Fischer et al., 1998;.”
BackgroundInfluentialCuticular Wax Accumulation Is Associated with Drought Tolerance in Wheat Near-Isogenic Lines
Guo, J., Xu, W., Yu, X.-C., Shen, H., Li, H.-S., Cheng, D., Liu, A.-F., Liu, J.-J., Liu, C., Zhao, S.-J., et al. (2016) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2016.01809 · Cited by 106
“For the DS condition, the wheat NILs were only irrigated at jointing.”
BackgroundOhsumi, A., Kanemura, T., Homma, K., Horie, T., & Shiraiwa, T. (2007) · doi:10.1626/pps.10.322 · Cited by 105
“Strong indications have been obtained for a major infl uence of gs on crop growth rate during reproductive period and yield of some crop species in previous studies (Lu et al., 1994; Fischer et al., 1998; Horie et al., 2006).”
BackgroundResultReynolds, M., Calderini, D., Condon, A., & Rajaram, S. (2001) · Euphytica · doi:10.1023/a:1017521800795 · Cited by 105
“…with studies of lines showing historic progress in yield (including some of the same backgrounds as used in the current study) in which high flag-leaf photosynthesis associated with higher spike-fertility was much more apparent during grain filling than at earlier stages (Fischer et al., 1998).”
ResultSelf-citationRoyo, C., Villegas, D., del Moral, L. F. G., Elhani, S., Aparicio, N., Rharrabti, Y., & Araus, J. L. (2002) · Australian Journal of Agricultural Research · doi:10.1071/ar01016 · Cited by 92
Araus, J. L., Cabrera‐Bosquet, L., Serret, M. D., Bort, J., & Nieto‐Taladriz, M. T. (2013) · Functional Plant Biology · doi:10.1071/fp12254 · Cited by 101
Akbar, H., Z., S., Saifuzzaman, M., Silvab, J. A. T. D., Lozovskaya, M., & Akhter, M. (2013) · doi:10.22069/ijpp.2013.1121 · Cited by 101
“Genotypic difference in duration of green leaves and LA in response to heat stress was also reported by Stone and Nicolas (1998) and Fisher et al. (1998).”
BackgroundFurbank, R., Quick, W. P., & Sirault, X. R. R. (2015) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2015.04.009 · Cited by 100
Babar, M., van Ginkel, M., Klatt, A., Prasad, B., & Reynolds, M. (2006) · Euphytica · doi:10.1007/s10681-006-9104-9 · Cited by 100
“…which can be sensed remotely using IR thermometry, was shown to be highly associated with the yield of wheat cultivars (Reynolds et al., 1994; Fischer et al., 1998), as well as the yield of recombinant inbred lines and advanced breeding materials (Reynolds et al., 1998; 1999) in irrigated,…”
BackgroundInheritance of Carbon Isotope Discrimination in Bread Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.)
Rebetzke, G., Richards, R. A., Condon, A., & Farquhar, G. (2006) · Euphytica · doi:10.1007/s10681-006-9097-4 · Cited by 100
“Indeed, Fischer et al. (1998) reported strong, positive relationships for and yield of CIMMYT wheats representing 30 years of breeding in irrigated environments.”
BackgroundSelf-citationFischer, R., & Rebetzke, G. (2018) · Australian Journal of Agricultural Research · doi:10.1071/cp17409 · Cited by 98
Self-citationChaudhary, S., Devi, P., Bhardwaj, A., Jha, U. C., Sharma, K. D., Prasad, P. V. V., Siddique, K. H. M., Bindumadhava, H., Kumar, S., & Nayyar, H. (2020) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2020.587264 · Cited by 135
UAV and Ground Image-Based Phenotyping: A Proof of Concept with Durum Wheat
Gracia-Romero, A., Kefauver, S., Fernandez-Gallego, J. A., Vergara-Díaz, O., Nieto-Taladriz, M. T., & Araus, J. (2019) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs11101244 · Cited by 96
“Under non-water-limited conditions, a cooler CT has been associated with genetic gains in wheat yield due to higher stomatal conductance and greater maximum photosynthetic rates [86].”
BackgroundThe Abiotic Stress Response and Adaptation of Triticale — A Review
Blum, A. (2014) · Cereal Research Communications · doi:10.1556/crc.42.2014.3.1 · Cited by 96
“…also sustain growth and yield under variable moisture and temperature conditions express higher stomatal conductance and gas exchange (Shimshi and Ephrat 1975; Lu and Zeiger 1994; Lu et al. 1994; Fischer et al. 1998; Horie et al. 2006; Blum 2011; Reynolds et al. 2012; Blum 2013; Wang et al. 2014).”
BackgroundImproving crop yield and resilience through optimization of photosynthesis: panacea or pipe dream?
Araus, J. L., Sánchez‐Bragado, R., & Vicente, R. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erab097 · Cited by 159
Natural genetic variation in photosynthesis: an untapped resource to increase crop yield potential?
Faralli, M., & Lawson, T. (2019) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.14568 · Cited by 95
“…2000; Xue et al., 2002; Chytyk et al., 2011; Sadras et al., 2012), and demon- strated a correlation between photosynthesis and yield (e.g. Blum, 1990; Fischer et al., 1998), although, such a relationship often depended on growth conditions (Xue et al., 2002), or when measurements were taken…”
BackgroundInfluentialMolero, G., Joynson, R., Piñera‐Chávez, F. J., Gardiner, L., Rivera‐Amado, C., Hall, A. J. W., & Reynolds, M. P. (2018) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/pbi.13052 · Cited by 139
“Yield progress has been associated with source-related traits such as photosynthetic rate and increased stomatal conductance in bread and durum wheats (Fischer, 2007; Fischer et al., 1998).”
BackgroundInfluentialGonzalez-Dugo, V., Hernández, P., Solís, I., & Zarco‐Tejada, P. J. (2015) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs71013586 · Cited by 113
“[52] demonstrated that the increase in yield in eight cultivars over six years was correlated with the difference between canopy and air temperatures (known as canopy temperature depression).”
BackgroundConnecting Biochemical Photosynthesis Models with Crop Models to Support Crop Improvement
Wu, A. C., Song, Y., van Oosterom, E. J., & Hammer, G. (2016) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2016.01518 · Cited by 109
“Crop growth and development simulation models that integrate across biological levels of organization and use a gene-to-phenotype modeling approach may present a way forward.”
BackgroundPhysiological factors associated with genotype by environment interaction in wheat
Reynolds, M., Trethowan, R., Crossa, J., Vargas, M., & Sayre, K. (2002) · doi:10.1016/s0378-4290(02)00023-0 · Cited by 94
Self-citationJuliana, P., Montesinos-López, O., Crossa, J., Mondal, S., Pérez, L. G., Poland, J., Huerta-Espino, J., Crespo-Herrera, L., Govindan, V., Dreisigacker, S., et al. (2018) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00122-018-3206-3 · Cited by 93
Merchuk-Ovnat, L., Barak, V., Fahima, T., Ordon, F., Lidzbarsky, G., Krugman, T., & Saranga, Y. (2016) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2016.00452 · Cited by 92
Sun, Y., Wang, X., Wang, N., Chen, Y., & Zhang, S. (2014) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2014.07.002 · Cited by 95
“Several studies reported that modern cultivars possess an increased Pn and stomatal conductance in the flag leaf (Fischer et al., 1998; Reynolds et al., 2000; Tian et al., 2011), especially after anthesis (Zheng et al., 2011), although other studies have presented contradictory results…”
BackgroundResultCzyczyło-Mysza, I., Tyrka, M., Marcińska, I., Skrzypek, E., Karbarz, M., Dziurka, M., Hura, T., Dziurka, K., & Quarrie, S. (2013) · Molecular breeding · doi:10.1007/s11032-013-9862-8 · Cited by 92
Connor, D., Loomis, R., & Cassman, K. (2011) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511974199 · Cited by 92
Infra-red Thermography for High Throughput Field Phenotyping in Solanum tuberosum
Prashar, A., Yildiz, J., McNicol, J., Bryan, G., & Jones, H. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0065816 · Cited by 91
“Similar results have been found for wheat and cotton [24,25,26,27,28].”
BackgroundResultEaslon, H. M., Nemali, K., Richards, J., Hanson, D., Juenger, T., & McKay, J. (2013) · Photosynthesis Research · doi:10.1007/s11120-013-9891-5 · Cited by 89
“Conversely, in conditions where water is not limiting, selection for reduced WUE may lead to greater yields (Passioura 1977; Fischer et al. 1998).”
BackgroundMunier-Jolain, N., & Salon, C. (2005) · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01371.x · Cited by 89
Eyland, D., van Wesemael, J., Lawson, T., & Carpentier, S. (2021) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1093/plphys/kiab114 · Cited by 126
“A high g s under steady-state conditions is associated with high A and consequently improved growth (Fischer et al., 1998; Franks, 2006).”
Zhang, Y., Xu, W., Wang, H., Dong, H., Qi, X., Zhao, M., Fang, Y., Gao, C., & Hu, L. (2016) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2016.09.022 · Cited by 108
Genomics for drought resistance - getting down to earth.
Blum, A. (2014) · Functional Plant Biology · doi:10.1071/fp14018 · Cited by 86
“Plant breeding and crop physiology research concluded that the common optimum consensus phenotype for plant production under water-limited conditions involves sustained stomatal conductance for transpiration and assimilation, which is identified in the field by producing relatively cooler leaves under stress (Lu and Z…”
BackgroundPhotosynthetic traits in Australian wheat varieties released between 1958 and 2007
Sadras, V. O., Lawson, C. D., & Montoro, A. (2012) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2012.04.012 · Cited by 92
“There re reports of both increase (Blum, 1990; Watanabe et al., 1994; ischer et al., 1998; Tian et al., 2011; Zheng et al., 2011) and lack f differences in leaf photosynthesis between older and newer heat cultivars (Morgan et al.”
BackgroundPhotosynthesis of wheat in a warm, irrigated environment
Gutiérrez-Rodrı́guez, M., Reynolds, M. P., & Larqué-Saavedra, A. (2000) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/s0378-4290(99)00078-7 · Cited by 169
Gutiérrez-Rodríguez, M., Reynolds, M., Escalante-Estrada, J., & Rodríguez-González, M. (2004) · doi:10.1071/ar04214 · Cited by 85
Photosynthetic performance of transgenic rice plants overexpressing maize C4 photosynthesis enzymes
Ku, M., Cho, D., Ranade, U., Hsu, T.-P., Li, X., Jiao, D., Ehleringer, J., Miyao, M., & Matsuoka, M. (2000) · doi:10.1016/s0928-3420(00)80015-4 · Cited by 85
Using Digestate and Biochar as Fertilizers to Improve Processing Tomato Production Sustainability
Ronga, D., Caradonia, F., Parisi, M., Bezzi, G., Parisi, B., Allesina, G., Pedrazzi, S., & Francia, E. (2020) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy10010138 · Cited by 84
“[49] reported a positive correlation between tomato yield and leaf photosynthetic activity and the same physiological behavior was also reported for other crops like wheat [55].”
BackgroundKumari, M., Pudake, R. N., Singh, V., & Joshi, A. (2013) · Euphytica · doi:10.1007/s10681-012-0780-3 · Cited by 83
Kim, Y., Still, C. J., Hanson, C. V., Kwon, H., Greer, B. T., & Law, B. E. (2016) · Agricultural and Forest Meteorology · doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.06.001 · Cited by 82
“The temoral variation of forest NEE has been explained by climatic factors n many studies (e.g. Greco and Baldocchi, 1996; Law et al., 2001; arr et al., 2007; Piao et al., 2008).”
BackgroundEstimation of Drought Tolerance Based on Leaf Temperature in Upland Rice Breeding
Hirayama, M., Wada, Y., & Nemoto, H. (2006) · doi:10.1270/jsbbs.56.47 · Cited by 82
QTL mapping for yield and photosynthetic related traits under different water regimes in wheat
Xu, Y.-F., Li, S.-S., Li, L.-H., Ma, F., Fu, X.-Y., Shi, Z.-L., Xu, H., Ma, P., & An, D.-G. (2017) · Molecular breeding · doi:10.1007/s11032-016-0583-7 · Cited by 81
“Significant positive correlations between grain yield and photosynthetic rate (0.73 < r < 0.86, P < 0.01), grain yield and stomatal conductance (0.70 < r < 0.94, P < 0.05) were detected in wheat cultivars (Fischer et al. 1998; Reynolds et al. 2000; Shimshi and Ephrat 1975).”
BackgroundInfluentialHaworth, M. R., Killi, D., Materassi, A., Raschi, A., & Centritto, M. (2016) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2016.01568 · Cited by 80
“…Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy, 3 National Research Council – Institute of Biometeorology, Florence, Italy Physiological control of stomatal conductance (Gs) permits plants to balance CO2uptake for photosynthesis (PN) against water-loss, so optimizing water use efficiency (WUE).”
BackgroundThe advantages of functional phenotyping in pre-field screening for drought-tolerant crops.
Negin, B., & Moshelion, M. (2016) · Functional Plant Biology · doi:10.1071/fp16156 · Cited by 80
Leaf economics spectrum in rice: leaf anatomical, biochemical, and physiological trait trade-offs
Xiong, D., & Flexas, J. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/ery322 · Cited by 79
Khalili, M., Naghavi, M., Aboughadareh, A. P., & Talebzadeh, S. (2012) · Journal of Agricultural Science · doi:10.5539/jas.v4n11p78 · Cited by 79
“Fischer et al. (1998) suggested that relative drought index (RDI) is positive indices for indicating stress tolerance.”
BackgroundMethodGosa, S. C., Lupo, Y., & Moshelion, M. (2018) · Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2018.05.008 · Cited by 94
Haworth, M. R., Marino, G., Cosentino, S., Brunetti, C., Carlo, A. D., Avola, G., Riggi, E., Loreto, F., & Centritto, M. (2018) · Environmental and Experimental Botany · doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2017.11.002 · Cited by 78
Ku, M., Cho, D., Li, X., Jiao, D., Pinto, M., Miyao, M., & Matsuoka, M. (2007) · Novartis Foundation symposium · doi:10.1002/9780470515778.ch8 · Cited by 77
Thapa, S., Jessup, K., Pradhan, G. P., Rudd, J., Liu, S.-Y., Mahan, J., Devkota, R., Baker, J., & Xue, Q. (2018) · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2017.12.005 · Cited by 76
Water stress effects on growth, yield and quality traits of red beet
Stagnari, F., Galieni, A., Speca, S., & Pisante, M. (2014) · Scientia Horticulturae · doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2013.10.026 · Cited by 76
Scafaro, A. P., Atwell, B., Muylaert, S., Reusel, B. V., Ruiz, G. A., Rie, J. V., & Gallé, A. (2018) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.01663 · Cited by 74
“In fact, many studies show limited direct evidence of leaf-level, steady-state photosynthesis impacting on yield (Zelitch, 1982; Fischer et al., 1998; Reynolds et al., 2000; Driever et al., 2014).”
BackgroundHaworth, M. R., Scutt, C., Douthe, C., Marino, G., Gomes, M. T. G., Loreto, F., Flexas, J., & Centritto, M. (2018) · Environmental and Experimental Botany · doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2018.04.010 · Cited by 74
“Nevertheless, high Gs is associated with increased yield in C3 crop species (Fischer et al., 1998; Roche, 2015).”
BackgroundBiju, S., Fuentes, S., & Gupta, D. (2018) · Plant physiology and biochemistry : PPB · doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.03.005 · Cited by 74
Semenov, M. A., Martre, P., & Jamieson, P. D. (2009) · Agricultural and Forest Meteorology · doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.01.006 · Cited by 79
Metadata
- Authors
- Fischer, R. A., Rees, D., Sayre, K. D., Lu, Z. ‐., Condon, A. G., & Saavedra, A. L.
- Affiliations
- Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (AU)
- Natural Resources Institute (GB)
- Centro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maíz Y Trigo (MX)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
- Cologeio de Postgraduados, Centro de Botanica Montecillo Texcoco Edo de Mexico Mexico
- Corresponding author
- Fischer, R. A.
- Venue
- Crop Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-11
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1467-1475
- ISSN
- 0011-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0653
- OpenAlex
- W2058467808
- Cited by
- 887
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 39
- FWCI
- 33.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Crop Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetics and Plant Breeding
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
- Keywords
- stomatal conductance, photosynthetic rate, canopy temperature depression, carbon isotope discrimination, leaf traits, intercellular CO2 concentration, northwestern Mexico
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review