The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Wheat Yield Progress Associated with Higher Stomatal Conductance and Photosynthetic Rate, and Cooler Canopies
Abstract
Grain yields of eight representative semidwarf spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars released in northwest Mexico between 1962 and 1988 have increased linearly across years as measured in this region during 6 yr under favorable management and irrigation. To understand the physiological basis of this progress and possibly assist future selection for grain yield, leaf traits were determined during 3 yr in the same study. Stomatal conductance (gs), maximum photosynthetic rate (A max, and canopy temperature depression (CTD), averaged over the 3 yr, were closely and positively correlated with progress in the 6‐yr mean yield. The correlation was greatest with gs (r = 0.94, P < 0.01). Compared with the overall yield increase of 27%, gs increased 63%, A max increased 23%, and canopies were 0.6°C cooler. Carbon‐13 isotope discrimination was also positively associated with yield progress (r = 0.71, P < 0.05), but other leaf traits such as flag leaf area, specific leaf weight, percentage N and greeness were not, nor was crop growth rate around anthesis. The causal basis of the leaf activity interrelationships is reasonably clear, with both increased intercellular CO 2 concentration and increased mesophyll activity contributing to the increase in A max. However, causal links to the yield progress, and the accompanying increase in kernels per square meter, are not clear. It is concluded that g s and CTD should be further investigated as potential indirect selection criteria for yield.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For example, a positive association of P N with drought tolerance has been reported in different crops, e.g., semi-dwarf spring wheat (Fischer et al. 1998), maize (Ashraf et al. 2007), transgenic lines of rice (Garg et al. 2002), and transgenic cotton lines (Yan et al. 2004).”
From Photosynthesis under stressful environments: An overview (2013) · cites this paper as Fischer et al. 1998
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 754
Muoma, J., & Ombori, O. (2014) · doi:10.4236/ajps.2014.56100 · Cited by 7
“A correlation between agronomical traits and the rate of photosynthesis has been reported in several studies [9]-[11].”
ResultHinkossa, A., Gebeyehu, S., & Zelleke, H. (2013) · doi:10.4314/star.v2i1.98839 · Cited by 7
Elazab, A., Castillo, D., Matus, I. A., Romero‐Bravo, S., Espinoza, S., Sadras, V. O., & del Pozo, A. (2025) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2025.109740 · Cited by 9
Estrada, F., Gonzàlez‐Meler, M. A., de Oliveira, E. A. D., del Pozo, A., & Lobos, G. A. (2025) · Food and Energy Security · doi:10.1002/fes3.70030 · Cited by 7
Huang, G.-R., Zhang, X.-Y., Wang, Z., Li, Y.-Z., Liu, X.-Y., Guo, R., Gu, F., Liu, E., Li, S., Zhong, X., et al. (2023) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy13030742 · Cited by 6
Kurešová, G., Haberle, J., Svoboda, P., Wollnerová, J., Moulik, M., Chrpova, J., & Raimanová, I. (2022) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy12122941 · Cited by 6
Zulkiffal, M., Ahmed, J., Riaz, M., Ramzan, Y., Ahsan, A., Kanwal, A., Ghafoor, I., Nadeem, M., & Abdullah, M. (2022) · SABRAO journal of breeding and genetics · doi:10.54910/sabrao2022.54.1.12 · Cited by 6
“Thus, CaTe is a prospective tool for the indirect assessment of the suitability of a genotype to stress environments and can be used as a special element for developing heat stresstolerant genotypes (Fischer et al., 1998).”
BackgroundMethodLeaf Photosynthesis Characteristics of Seven Japanese Strawberry Cultivars Grown in a Greenhouse
Kanno, K., Sugiyama, T., Eguchi, M., Iwasaki, Y., & Higashide, T. (2021) · The Horticulture Journal · doi:10.2503/hortj.utd-237 · Cited by 6
Kızılgeçi, F., & Yıldırım, M. (2019) · Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi · doi:10.30910/turkjans.633593 · Cited by 6
Jokar, F., Karimizadeh, R., Masoumiasl, A., & Amiri-Fahliani, R. (2018) · Notulae Scientia Biologicae · doi:10.15835/nsb10410288 · Cited by 6
“, 2012) and has been associated with yield increase among bread wheat cultivars at CIMMYT (Fischer et al., 1998).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialKastury, F., Eichi, V. R., Enju, A., Okamoto, M., Heuer, S., & Melino, V. J. (2018) · Soil science and plant nutrition (Tokyo) · doi:10.1080/00380768.2018.1493341 · Cited by 6
“Photosynthetic assimilation may be affected by drought as a result of stomatal closure and decreased CO2 availability or indirectly as a result of oxidative damage, affecting the photosynthetic capacity of the plant (Chaves et al. 2009; Fischer et al. 1998).”
BackgroundEffect of canopy temperature on the stripe rust resistance of wheat
Cheng, J., Li, H., Ren, B., Zhou, C.-J., Kang, Z., & Huang, L.-L. (2015) · doi:10.1080/01140671.2015.1098708 · Cited by 6
“Wheat varieties with low canopy temperatures are reported to have superior physiological and metabolic aspects (Zhang 1990, 1997; Zhang & Wang 1999a,b; Feng et al. 2001, 2002, 2009; Ayeneh et al. 2002), grow well and have high water utilisation rates (Pinter et al. 1990; Fischer et al. 1998).”
BackgroundDevelopment of vegetative propagation for Actaea racemosa Nutt
Fischer, S., Berti, M., Wilckens, R., & del Pozo, A. (2006) · doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2006.06.004 · Cited by 6
“Fischer et al. / Industrial Crops and Products 24 (2006) 244–252”
BackgroundEffects of Soil Water Deficit on Carbon Metabolism of Plants: A Review
Bhattacharya, A. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-33-6276-5_2 · Cited by 5
Chapter 2 Stomatal Responses to Climate Change
Stevens, J., Faralli, M., Wall, S. A., Stamford, J. D., & Lawson, T. (2021) · Advances in photosynthesis and respiration · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-64926-5_2 · Cited by 22
Seeda, A., & el-Nour, A. (2021) · Middle East Journal of Applied Sciences · doi:10.36632/mejas/2021.11.1.8 · Cited by 4
Plant Breeding Under a Changing Climate
Dreccer, M. F., Bonnett, D. G., & Lafarge, T. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-2493-6_307-3 · Cited by 5
Ramya, K., Jain, N., Amasiddha, B., Singh, P., Arora, A., Singh, G., & Prabhu, K. (2016) · doi:10.5958/0975-6906.2016.00040.7 · Cited by 6
Aerial phenotyping for sugarcane yield and drought tolerance
Hoffman, N., Singels, A., & Joshi, S. (2024) · Field crops research (Print) · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2024.109275 · Cited by 5
Chao, M., Hu, G., Dong, J., Chen, Y., Fu, Y., Zhang, J., & Wang, Q. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms24076648 · Cited by 6
Association of canopy temperature with agronomic traits in spring wheat inbred populations
Shrestha, S. L., Garland-Campbell, K., Steber, C., Pan, W., & Hulbert, S. (2022) · Euphytica · doi:10.1007/s10681-022-03135-4 · Cited by 5
Yang, G.-T., Liu, R., Ma, P., Chen, H., Zhang, R.-P., Wang, X.-C., Li, Y., & Hu, Y.-G. (2022) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants11172306 · Cited by 5
“The temperature and humidity variation caused by crop population structure could further affect the variation in plant type and yield components [24].”
BackgroundGalicia-Juárez, M., Zavala-García, F., Sinagawa-García, S. R., Gutiérrez-Diez, A., Williams‐Alanis, H., Cisneros-López, M. E., Valle-Gough, R. E., Flores-Garivay, R., & Santillano-Cázares, J. (2021) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants10112265 · Cited by 5
High Yielding Mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] Variety “NIFA Mung-2017”
Khattak, G. S. S. (2020) · Pure and Applied Biology · doi:10.19045/bspab.2020.90278 · Cited by 5
“NIFA Mung-2017 also showed reasonable harvest index (Table 13) indicating an inherent potential of this variety for carrying out efficient photosynthesis through enhanced biomass and therefore producing and channeling more photosynthates towards healthy grain formation and filling, as these traits are known to have po…”
BackgroundShamim, M., Tanaka, Y., Sakoda, K., Shiraiwa, T., & Nelson, R. (2020) · Plant Production Science · doi:10.1080/1343943x.2020.1807369 · Cited by 5
“These findings are consistent with the findings of Fischer et al. (1998).”
ResultAsif, A., Ansari, M. Y., Hashem, A., Tabassum, B., Abd_Allah, E., & Ahmad, A. (2019) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants8090321 · Cited by 5
“Increased photosynthesis enhances crop yields [29,30].”
Mesorhizobium ciceri-CR-39 inoculation to wheat for drought tolerance at critical growth stages
Hussain, M. B., Zahir, Z. A., Mehboob, I., Mehmood, S., Ahmad, N., Haq, T. U., Ahmad, I., & Imran, M. (2018) · Pakistan journal of botany · doi:10.30848/pjb2019-1(26 · Cited by 5
Selection of Yield-Related Traits for Wheat Breeding in Semi-Arid Region
Yan, J.-K., Zhang, N.-N., Wang, X., & Zhang, S. (2018) · doi:10.17957/ijab/15.0523 · Cited by 5
“The photosynthetic rate, especially the flag leaf Pn, plays an important role in grain yield (Fischer et al., 1998; Shah and Paulsen, 2003).”
BackgroundDeciphering physiological basis of yield gain in India wheat cultivars
Gupta, S. K., Yadav, R., Gaikwad, K., Arora, A., Kumar, A., Kushwah, A., & Bainsla, N. K. (2017) · Cereal Research Communications · doi:10.1556/0806.45.2017.023 · Cited by 5
“Fischer et al. (1998) also found positive correlation of photosynthetic rate, canopy temperature depression and stomatal conductance with the gain in seed yield among varieties released in Mexico from 1932 to 1988.”
BackgroundZhang, X.-Y., Zhang, X.-Y., Chen, S.-Y., Sun, H.-Y., Shao, L., & Liu, X.-W. (2016) · Experimental Agriculture · doi:10.1017/s0014479716000235 · Cited by 5
“These traits include specific leaf area (SLA), stem water soluble carbohydrate, anthesis date, leaf water potential, crop canopy T and yield performance (Fischer et al., 1998; Lilley and Fukai, 1994; O’Toole and Moya, 1978; Pantuwan et al., 2001a, b).”
BackgroundAbeysiriwardena, D. S. D. (2016) · doi:10.4038/sljfa.v2i1.20 · Cited by 5
“However, in wheat, while the ‘sink’ strength of grain and photosynthetic capacity may be more in balance, historic gains in wheat yield potential have been associated with increased photosynthesis (Fischer et al., 1998).”
BackgroundPlanting pattern and irrigation effects on water status of winter wheat
Wang, G.-Y., Zhou, X.-B., & Chen, Y. (2016) · Journal of Agricultural Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0021859615001197 · Cited by 5
“Stomatal conductance is important for determining the water use efficiency and productivity of crops (Fischer et al. 1998).”
BackgroundLong‐Term Selection in Plants in the Developing World
Miles, J., & Pandey, S. (2010) · doi:10.1002/9780470650288.ch2 · Cited by 5
Differences in Salt Tolerance Between Phaseolus vulgaris and Phaseolus coccineus Cultivars
Gutiérrez, M., Escalante-Estrada, J., & Rodríguez-González, M. (2009) · doi:10.3923/ijar.2009.270.278 · Cited by 5
Use of Carbon Isotope Discrimination (?) in Breeding of C3 Cereals Under Water Deficit Conditions
Tsialtas, J., & Tokatlidis, I. (2008) · doi:10.3923/ajps.2008.518.525 · Cited by 5
Carbon isotope discrimination studies in plants for abiotic stress
More, S., Ravi, V., & Raju, S. (2022) · Climate Change and Crop Stress · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-816091-6.00004-3 · Cited by 5
Key Applications of CRISPR/Cas for Yield and Nutritional Improvement
Mubarik, M. S., Khan, S. H., & Sajjad, M. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-7142-8_7 · Cited by 8
Slafer, G. A., Savin, R., Pinochet, D. E., & Calderini, D. F. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819194-1.00003-7 · Cited by 48
Phenotyping Through Infrared Thermography in Stress Environment
Siddiqui, Z. S., Umar, M., Kwon, T., & Park, S.-C. (2019) · Sabkha Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-04417-6_15 · Cited by 5
Analysis of variance and its sources in UAV-based multi-view thermal imaging of wheat plots
Treier, S., Roth, L., Hund, A., Aasen, H., Häner, L. L., Vuille-dit-Bille, N., Walter, A., & Herrera, J. M. (2025) · Plant Phenomics · doi:10.1016/j.plaphe.2025.100046 · Cited by 4
Li, X.-L., Li, X.-M., Zhang, T., Xue, X., Dai, Y., Lei, Z.-Y., & He, D. (2024) · Crop science · doi:10.1002/csc2.21443 · Cited by 4
MajidiMehr, A., Pahlavani, M., Gataa, Z. E., & Amiri-Fahliani, R. (2024) · Gene Reports · doi:10.1016/j.genrep.2024.102054 · Cited by 4
Pre-anthesis morpho-physiological response of tropical sorghum to combined drought and heat stress
Ndlovu, E., Maphosa, M., & van Staden, J. (2024) · South African Journal of Botany · doi:10.1016/j.sajb.2024.07.045 · Cited by 4
Mohammed, A. A. A., Tsubo, M., Ma, S.-X., Kurosaki, Y., Ibaraki, Y., Tahir, I., Gorafi, Y. S. A., Idris, A. A. M., & Tsujimoto, H. (2023) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy13123032 · Cited by 4
Defining durum wheat ideotypes adapted to Mediterranean environments through remote sensing traits
Gracia-Romero, A., Vatter, T., Kefauver, S., Rezzouk, F. Z., Segarra, J., Nieto-Taladriz, M. T., Aparicio, N., & Araus, J. (2023) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2023.1254301 · Cited by 4
Zhou, Y.-L., Liao, L.-T., Liu, L., Xiao, L., Zhou, Z., Zhou, Y., Hu, Z.-Y., & Liu, S.-Q. (2023) · Horticulturae · doi:10.3390/horticulturae9090951 · Cited by 4
Rossi, R., Bitella, G., Bochicchio, R., Labella, R., Angerame, F., Urbano, M., & Amato, M. (2023) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants12030588 · Cited by 4
“[46] compared a set of irrigated semi-dwarf bread wheat varieties released between 1962 and 1988 and found that stomatal conductance was positively associated with the year of release, with the newest varieties showing higher gs, and also higher yields.”
BackgroundSalinity indices and path analysis in Egyptian long-staple cotton cultivars
Mahdy, E., Mahrous, H., Sayed, M., & Housein, M. G. (2021) · SVU-International Journal of Agricultural Sciences · doi:10.21608/svuijas.2021.94700.1140 · Cited by 4
Sanchez-Bragado, R., Newcomb, M., Chairi, F., Condorelli, G. E., Ward, R., White, J., Maccaferri, M., Tuberosa, R., Araus, J., & Molins, M. D. S. (2020) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy10111679 · Cited by 4
“Negative genotypic relationships of δ13C with canopy biomass and even more with grain yield have been reported before [3,38,47,62].”
BackgroundS., R. M., R., S., S., K. H., & Naik, V. G. (2020) · doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2019.108819 · Cited by 4
Nabeshima, S., Yasutake, D., & Kitano, M. (2019) · Environment Control in Biology · doi:10.2525/ecb.57.29 · Cited by 4
“A higher leaf photosynthetic capacity has been reported to contribute to higher yields in tomato (Higashide and Heuvelink, 2009), spring wheat (Fischer et al., 1998) and rice (Jiang et al., 1988; Takai et al., 2013), but has not been related to higher yields in strawberry (Mochizuki et al., 2013)…”
BackgroundThe relationship between leaf and ecosystem CO2 exchanges in a maize field
Xu, Z.-Z., Zhou, G.-S., Han, G., & Li, Y.-J. (2018) · Acta Physiologiae Plantarum · doi:10.1007/s11738-018-2732-6 · Cited by 4
Kızılgeçi, F., Yildirim, M., Albayrak, Ö., & Akıncı, C. (2016) · doi:10.21597/jist.2016321851 · Cited by 4
Makarnalik Buğdayda Ekim Sikliğinin Fizyolojik Parametreler Üzerine Etkileri
Dalkılıç, A., Kara, R., Yürürdurmaz, C., Şimşek, B., Aldemir, Y., & Akkaya, A. (2016) · doi:10.21566/tbmaed.35475 · Cited by 4
Analysis of yield-attributing traits for high-yielding wheat lines in southwestern Japan
Okami, M., Matsunaka, H., Fujita, M., Nakamura, K., & Nishio, Z. (2016) · Plant Production Science · doi:10.1080/1343943x.2016.1151331 · Cited by 6
Kato, Y., & Osawa, M. (2013) · doi:10.1016/j.eja.2013.03.007 · Cited by 4
Kimurto, P., Ogola, J., Kinyua, M. G., Macharia, J., & Njau, P. (2009) · doi:10.1080/02571862.2009.10639938 · Cited by 4
“These results are in line with the conclusions of Fisher et al. (1998) and El Hafid et al. (1998) that higher stomatal conductance, which enhances greater CO2 assimilation, has been documented as a trait for increasing grain yield under stress.”
ResultZhu, L., Gao, X., Su, Y., & Xu, X. (2019) · Crop science · doi:10.2135/cropsci2017.08.0475 · Cited by 4
“…in Gs, which decreases Ci/ Ca and thus D. Positive correlations between D and water status parameters have been repeatedly reported in wheat (Fischer, 1998; Merah et al., 2001b; Monneveux et al., 2005; Zhu et al., 2008b) and alfalfa (Pozo et al., 2017), underlining the interest in the use…”
BackgroundRajendran, K., Patil, S. B., & Kumar, S. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-81-322-2226-2_9 · Cited by 3
Transpiration efficiency : avenues for genetic improvement.
Subbarao, G., Johansen, C., Rao, R. C. N., & Wright, G. (2002) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9780203908426-46 · Cited by 4
Diversity of Photosynthesis-Related and High-Throughput Phenotyping Traits in Indica Rice
Lin, H.-C., Dionora, J., Chebotarov, D., Laza, M. R., Naredo, M., Muyco, P. A., Klassen, S., Henry, A., Quick, W. P., & McNally, K. L. (2026) · Current Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cpb.2026.100613 · Cited by 3
Yustiningsih, M., Dinarti, D., Purwoko, B., Suwarno, W. B., Dare, D., & Sutapa, I. (2026) · Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology · doi:10.1016/j.ecohyd.2026.100730 · Cited by 3
Stadnik, B., Tobiasz-Salach, R. E., & Migut, D. (2025) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.19966 · Cited by 3
“In studies on wheat and barley, stomatal conductance and CO 2 assimilation rate were reported to correlate with grain yield ( Fischer et al., 1998 ; Gonzalez, Bermejo & Gimeno, 2010 ).”
Micro-dust and Pistacia atlantica tolerance
Moradi, A., Shabanian, N., Mohammadian, M., & Abkenar, K. T. (2023) · Natural Hazards · doi:10.1007/s11069-023-05894-2 · Cited by 3
“Net photosynthetic rate is commonly used as an index of the effect of air pollution on plant growth (Woo et al. 2007; Fischer et al. 1998) stated that one of the important factors in reducing photosynthesis is the closure of stomata which reduces the stomatal conductance.”
BackgroundOhnishi, S., Kasuya, M., Sonoda, T., & Jinno, H. (2021) · Breeding Science · doi:10.1270/jsbbs.21011 · Cited by 3
“When the potential yield is advanced in breeding pro‐ grams, stomatal aperture-related traits such as stomatal con‐ ductance are often improved simultaneously (Fischer et al. 1998, Fischer and Rebetzke 2018, Morrison et al. 1999, Takai et al. 2010, Tanaka et al. 2010).”
BackgroundStevens, J., Jones, M. P., & Lawson, T. (2021) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy11050921 · Cited by 3
“Both the kinetic responses and light response curves demonstrate a clear correlation between A and gs (Figures 1 and 2, Supplemental Materials), with high gs values correlated with A, supporting the close relationship between A and gs [54].”
BackgroundResultPrakash, P. T., Banan, D., Paul, R. E., Feldman, M. J., Xie, D., Freyfogle, L., Baxter, I. R., & Leakey, A. (2020) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2020.10.14.339580 · Cited by 3
“This is consistent with RILs that had higher temperatures due to less evaporative cooling being able to assimilate less CO2, and therefore producing less biomass, which was expected based on theory and previous studies (Fischer et al., 1998; Jones, 2004).”
MethodResultTemperature Effects on the Photosynthesis by the Medicinal Plant Pinellia ternata Breit
Eguchi, T., Tanaka, H., Moriuchi, D., Yoshida, S., & Matsuoka, K. (2020) · Environment Control in Biology · doi:10.2525/ecb.58.49 · Cited by 3
“Higher leaf photosynthetic capacity has been reported to contribute to higher yields in some crops (Jiang et al., 1988; Fischer et al., 1998; Higashide and Heuvelink, 2009; Takai et al., 2013).”
BackgroundSakoda, K., Kaga, A., Tanaka, Y., Suzuki, S., Fujii, K., Ishimoto, M., & Shiraiwa, T. (2020) · Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2019.110300 · Cited by 3
Ozone Tolerance Found in Aegilops tauschii and Primary Synthetic Hexaploid Wheat
Brewster, C., Hayes, F., & Fenner, N. (2019) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants8070195 · Cited by 10
“As higher levels of ozone damage may be correlated with higher levels of ozone flux there is concern that trait selection to increase stomatal conductance in order to maximise photosynthesis [55] may have led to an inadvertent increase in ozone damage [13].”
BackgroundMoradi, A., Abkenar, K. T., Mohammadian, M., & Shabanian, N. (2018) · doi:10.22124/cjes.2018.3063 · Cited by 3
“Fischer et al. (1998) have reported that the main limiting factor in photosynthesis is the decreased mesophyll conductance.”
BackgroundStomataCounter: a neural network for automatic stomata identification and countingPreprint
Fetter, K. C., Eberhardt, S., Barclay, R. S., Wing, S., & Keller, S. R. (2018) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/327494 · Cited by 5
“At the molecular level, regulation of stomata has been the subject of numerous genetic studies (see Shimazaki et al. , 2007; Kim et al. , 2010 for detailed reviews), and can be trait targeted in plant breeding and crop improvement projects (Fischer et al. , 1998).”
BackgroundDing, J., Su, S., Zhang, Y., Li, C., Zhu, X., & Guo, W. (2017) · doi:10.5539/jas.v9n4p128 · Cited by 3
“…studies that investigated the genetic gain in wheat cultivars were conducted in different wheat-growing regions under appropriate water conditions (Fischer et al., 1998), few studies focused on the responses and mechanisms of wheat cultivarsto waterlogging from different periods in the…”
BackgroundChowdhury, S., Brahmanand, P., Kundu, D., Thakur, A., & Kumar, A. (2014) · Indian Journal of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1007/s40502-014-0082-y · Cited by 3
“correlations in several crops, like in wheat (Fischer et al. 1998), sweet potato (Roy Chowdhury and Varma 1998), swamp taro (Roy Chowdhury et al.”
Sihem, M. F., & Bouzerzour, H. (2013) · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.380 · Cited by 3
Research Status Quo and Future of Low Temperature Wheat Genotypes
Zhang, S.-W., & Wang, C.-F. (2008) · doi:10.1016/s1671-2927(08)60397-1 · Cited by 3
Low temperature wheat germplasm and its leaf photosynthetic traits and structure characteristics
Zhang, S.-W., Miao, F., & Wang, C.-F. (2004) · doi:10.1080/10020070412331343831 · Cited by 3
Yield Potential Analysis of Desi Chickpea Genotypes in Water Stress Conditions
Taleei, A., & Shaabani, J. (2016) · doi:10.14257/astl.2016.142.02 · Cited by 3
Genomics Approaches to Dissect the Genetic Basis of Drought Resistance in Durum Wheat
Tuberosa, R., & Maccaferri, M. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-4-431-55675-6_23 · Cited by 3
“A study conducted on a series of successful bread wheat cultivars released from 1962 to 1988 showed a strong and positive correlation between stomatal conductance and grain yield ( r = 0.94; Fischer et al. 1998 ), suggesting that the more modern cultivars extract more water from the soil.”
BackgroundInfluentialPlant Breeding Under a Changing Climate
Dreccer, M. F., Bonnett, D. G., & Lafarge, T. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-5797-8_307 · Cited by 2
Flores-Olave, J., Khan, H.-A., Pérez, I., Pacheco, J., Cares, J., Araya-Riquelme, C., Moraga, F., Matus, I., Castillo, D., Inostroza, L., et al. (2026) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants15050797 · Cited by 2
Towards modeling soil erosion in a perennial ground cover (PGC) system
Olowoyeye, O. S., & Kaleita, A. (2026) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111365 · Cited by 2
Shabankareh, H. G., Khorasaninejad, S., Soltanloo, H., & Asgharipour, M. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-23567-x · Cited by 2
“Additionally, some parameters like mesophyll conductance (mmol m ⁻ ² s ⁻ ¹) (Fischer et al., 1998) based on Eq.”
Moradi, S., Zamani, Z., Fatahi, R., Koushesh-Saba, M., Pampinella, D., Laudicina, V., Inglese, P., & Liguori, G. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-22501-5 · Cited by 2
Singh, J., Pandey, S., Lal, N., & Nath, V. (2023) · Erwerbs-obstbau · doi:10.1007/s10341-023-00862-3 · Cited by 2
“…leaf temperature, relative humidity, vapour pressure deficit (VPD), using an infrared gas analyzer (IRGA) as per the method outlined by Fischer et al. (1998), were measured with the help of the Portable Photosynthesis System-I (CIRAS 2, Amesbury, USA, version 2.01) between 9.30 and…”
MethodInfluentialZHANG, X. H., Li, H., ZHUO, G., He, Z., ZHANG, C. Y., SHI, Z., LI, C. C., & Wang, Y. (2022) · Photosynthetica · doi:10.32615/ps.2022.041 · Cited by 2
Drought tolerance indices and path-analysis in long staple cotton genotypes (G. barbadense)
Mahdy, E., Abo-Elwafa, S. F., Abdel-Zahir, G. H., & Abdelrahman, N. I. (2021) · SVU-International Journal of Agricultural Sciences · doi:10.21608/svuijas.2021.81692.1119 · Cited by 2
“10- Relative drought index (RDI) = (Ys/Yp) (Ys/ Yp) (Fischer et al., 1998) 3.”
Noura, M., Laid, B., Hammena, B., Ammar, B., & Faiçal, B. (2021) · Food Science and Engineering · doi:10.37256/fse.222021954 · Cited by 2
“Yield improvement is associated with increased ground biomass, harvest index, the reduction of the height and standard leaf area [7-8].”
Fugitive road dust alters annual plant physiology but perennial grass growth appears resistant
McGranahan, D., & Poling, B. N. (2021) · Plant Ecology · doi:10.1007/s11258-021-01121-9 · Cited by 2
Kumar, A., Bharti, B., Kumar, J., Jaiswal, S., & Prasad, R. (2020) · Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding · doi:10.37992/2020.1103.120 · Cited by 2
“Fischer et al. (1998) suggested that the relative drought index (RDI) is a positive index for indicating stress tolerance.”
BackgroundDetermination of Correlation between Stomatal Density and Gas Exchange Traits in Guava
Nagaraja, B., & Goswami, M. (2017) · doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2017.609.160 · Cited by 2
“Accepted: 17 July 2017 Available Online: 10 September 2017 Article Info Fischer et al., 1998; Horie et al., 2006).”
Yield Potential Screening of Desi Chickpea Genotypes in Water Stress Conditions
Taleei, A., & Shaabani, J. (2017) · International Journal of Bio-Science and Bio-Technology · doi:10.14257/ijbsbt.2017.9.1.07 · Cited by 2
“Fischer et al. (1998) proposed relative drought index (RDI), which could be representing genotypes tolerance to drought stress.”
BackgroundYield potential Analysis of Kabuli Chickpea Genotypes in Water Stress Conditions
Taleei, A., & Shaabani, J. (2016) · Advanced science and technology letters · doi:10.14257/astl.2016.142.01 · Cited by 2
“Fischer et al [9] proposed that relative drought index (RDI) could be a useful index for indicating stress tolerance.”
BackgroundArafa, A., Khafagy, M., Kheer, A. A., Fouda, R., & Elbanna, M. (2014) · doi:10.21608/jpp.2014.53867 · Cited by 2
“Some reports indicated the influence of stomatal conductance on crop growth rate during reproductive period and yield of some crops species (Fischer et al., 1998) which may be associated with stomatal density.”
BackgroundEffects of excessive nitrogen supply on productivity of winter wheat
Zhao, F.-H., Ma, J.-H., & Ouyang, Z. (2013) · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1258.2012.01075 · Cited by 2
Tan, N., Lin, Q., Jiang, W., Liu, Y.-G., & Li, L.-Y. (2011) · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1011.2011.00805 · Cited by 2
Exploring relationships between root architecture and growth of UK wheats (Triticum aestivum L.)
Hodgkinson, L. (2017) · doi:10.17635/lancaster/thesis/133 · Cited by 2
“An alternative would be to measure canopy temperature: well-hydrated plants generally have cooler canopies (Blum et al. 1989, Munns et al. 2010), and lower canopy temperature can also be used as selection criteria for breeding drought resistant wheat (Fischer et al. 1998).”
BackgroundMamrutha, H., Krishnappa, G., Khobra, R., Kumar, Y., Vinayaka, Amaresh, Pathy, T. L., Pandey, V., Biradar, S., Singh, C., et al. (2026) · BMC Plant Biology · doi:10.1186/s12870-026-09090-9 · Cited by 1
“Lower canopy temperature, or higher canopy temperature depression, reflects improved tran-spirational cooling and has been widely recognized as a reliable trait for identifying stress-resilient genotypes [107–109].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Fischer, R. A., Rees, D., Sayre, K. D., Lu, Z. ‐., Condon, A. G., & Saavedra, A. L.
- Affiliations
- Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (AU)
- Natural Resources Institute (GB)
- Centro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maíz Y Trigo (MX)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
- Cologeio de Postgraduados, Centro de Botanica Montecillo Texcoco Edo de Mexico Mexico
- Corresponding author
- Fischer, R. A.
- Venue
- Crop Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-11
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1467-1475
- ISSN
- 0011-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0653
- OpenAlex
- W2058467808
- Cited by
- 887
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 39
- FWCI
- 33.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Crop Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetics and Plant Breeding
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
- Keywords
- stomatal conductance, photosynthetic rate, canopy temperature depression, carbon isotope discrimination, leaf traits, intercellular CO2 concentration, northwestern Mexico
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review