The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Wheat Yield Progress Associated with Higher Stomatal Conductance and Photosynthetic Rate, and Cooler Canopies
Abstract
Grain yields of eight representative semidwarf spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars released in northwest Mexico between 1962 and 1988 have increased linearly across years as measured in this region during 6 yr under favorable management and irrigation. To understand the physiological basis of this progress and possibly assist future selection for grain yield, leaf traits were determined during 3 yr in the same study. Stomatal conductance (gs), maximum photosynthetic rate (A max, and canopy temperature depression (CTD), averaged over the 3 yr, were closely and positively correlated with progress in the 6‐yr mean yield. The correlation was greatest with gs (r = 0.94, P < 0.01). Compared with the overall yield increase of 27%, gs increased 63%, A max increased 23%, and canopies were 0.6°C cooler. Carbon‐13 isotope discrimination was also positively associated with yield progress (r = 0.71, P < 0.05), but other leaf traits such as flag leaf area, specific leaf weight, percentage N and greeness were not, nor was crop growth rate around anthesis. The causal basis of the leaf activity interrelationships is reasonably clear, with both increased intercellular CO 2 concentration and increased mesophyll activity contributing to the increase in A max. However, causal links to the yield progress, and the accompanying increase in kernels per square meter, are not clear. It is concluded that g s and CTD should be further investigated as potential indirect selection criteria for yield.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For example, a positive association of P N with drought tolerance has been reported in different crops, e.g., semi-dwarf spring wheat (Fischer et al. 1998), maize (Ashraf et al. 2007), transgenic lines of rice (Garg et al. 2002), and transgenic cotton lines (Yan et al. 2004).”
From Photosynthesis under stressful environments: An overview (2013) · cites this paper as Fischer et al. 1998
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 754
Optimizing Canopy Physiology Traits to Improve the Nutrient Utilization Efficiency of Crops
Foulkes, J. M., & Murchie, E. H. (2011) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470960707.ch4 · Cited by 16
Photosynthesis of spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum ) in rainfed ecology of Pakistan
Ahmed, M., Hassan, F., Aslam, M., Akram, M. N., & Aslam, M. (2010) · AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY · doi:10.5897/ajb10.968 · Cited by 15
“Current studies have revealed that there is conjugation between yield and higher rate of CO2 fixation (Fischer et al., 1998).”
BackgroundSteps Towards Feeding the Ten Billion: A crop physiologists view
Evans, L. (1999) · doi:10.1626/pps.2.3 · Cited by 15
Sohail, M., Hussain, I., Qamar, M., Tanveer, S. K., Abbas, S., Ali, Z., & Imtiaz, M. (2020) · Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Research · doi:10.17582/journal.pjar/2020/33.1.89.96 · Cited by 15
“Fischer et al. (1998) observed strong association of cool crop canopy temperature maintenance under stressful environment with grain yield increase in wheat genotypes.”
BackgroundRates of yield gain of hard red spring wheat in western Canada
Thomas, J. B., & Graf, R. (2013) · Canadian Journal of Plant Science · doi:10.1139/cjps2013-160 · Cited by 15
Nguyen, V., Palmer, L. J., & Stangoulis, J. C. R. (2022) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2021.816211 · Cited by 14
Baştuğ, R., Karaca, C., Buyuktas, D., Aydinsakir, K., & Dinç, N. (2021) · Irrigation science · doi:10.1007/s00271-021-00732-4 · Cited by 14
Wang, X., Christensen, S., Svensgaard, J., Jensen, S. M., & Liu, F. (2020) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy10091391 · Cited by 15
Romero‐Bravo, S., Méndez-Espinoza, A. M., Garriga, M., Estrada, F., Escobar, A., González-Martínez, L., Poblete-Echeverría, C., Sepulveda, D., Matus, I. A., Castillo, D., et al. (2019) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s19122676 · Cited by 16
Heat Tolerance in Wheat - A Key Strategy to Combat Climate Change through Molecular Markers
Chandra, K., Prasad, R., Thakur, P., Madhukar, K., & Prasad, L. (2017) · doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2017.603.077 · Cited by 14
“Plot yield (Fisher et al., 1998) Thousand grains weight (Shpiler and Blum, 1991) Grain filling duration (Randall and Moss, 1990) Number of effective tillers per plant (Richards, 1996)”
BackgroundCrop Radiation Use Efficiency and Photosynthate Formation—Avenues for Genetic Improvement
Ito, O., Subbarao, G. V., & Berry, W. J. (2005) · Books in soils, plants, and the environment · doi:10.1201/9781420027877.sec10 · Cited by 11
Genetic Solutions to Improve Resilience of Canola to Climate Change
Raman, H., Uppal, R. K., & Raman, R. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-93536-2_2 · Cited by 18
Breeding challenge: improving yield potential
Foulkes, J. M., & Reynolds, M. P. (2014) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-417104-6.00016-9 · Cited by 19
Yol, E., Toker, C., & Uzun, B. (2015) · doi:10.1007/978-81-322-2226-2_2 · Cited by 14
Sadeh, R., Victor Alchanatis, B., Ben‐David, R., Peleg, Z., & Herrmann, I. (2025) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2025.110411 · Cited by 13
Phenotyping genotypic performance under multistress conditions: Mediterranean wheat as a case study
Araus, J. L., Rezzouk, F. Z., Sánchez‐Bragado, R., Aparicio, N., & Serret, M. D. (2023) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2023.109122 · Cited by 15
Levi, M., Applebaum, I., Sherman, C., Doniger, T., & Steinberger, Y. (2022) · Rhizosphere · doi:10.1016/j.rhisph.2022.100605 · Cited by 13
Canopy cooling traits associated with yield performance in heat-stressed oat
López, J. R., Tamang, B. G., Monnens, D., Smith, K. P., & Sadok, W. (2022) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/j.eja.2022.126555 · Cited by 15
Breeding has selected for architectural and photosynthetic traits in lentils
Silva-Pérez, V., Shunmugam, A., Rao, S., Cossani, C. M., Tefera, A., Fitzgerald, G., Armstrong, R., & Rosewarne, G. (2022) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.925987 · Cited by 13
“A positive correlation between CO2 assimilation rate (A) with yield and year of release has been found, suggesting indirect selection for photosynthetic traits (Reynolds et al., 1994, 2000a; Fischer et al., 1998; Tang et al., 2017).”
BackgroundResultRaman, H., Raman, R., Pirathiban, R., McVittie, B., Sharma, N., Liu, S.-Y., Qiu, Y., Zhu, A.-Y., Kilian, A., Cullis, B., et al. (2022) · Plant, Cell and Environment · doi:10.1111/pce.14337 · Cited by 13
“…2016; Masle et al., 2005) and some agricultural crop plants, including canola (Des Marais et al., 2014; Ehleringer, 1993; Farquhar & Richards, 1984; Fischer et al., 1998; Hall et al., 1994; Hossain et al., 2020; Rebetzke et al., 2008), with some exceptions where nil or weak positive relationships…”
BackgroundFischer, T., Honsdorf, N., Lilley, J. M., Mondal, S., Ortiz‐Monasterio, I., & Verhulst, N. (2021) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108331 · Cited by 15
Kaur, P., Sachan, S., & Sharma, A. (2021) · Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants · doi:10.1007/s12298-021-01079-y · Cited by 15
Hakeem, S., Ali, Z., Saddique, M., Habiburrahman, M., & Trethowan, R. (2021) · Planta · doi:10.1007/s00425-021-03645-w · Cited by 13
QTL analysis of leaf photosynthesis rate and related physiological traits in Brassica napus
Yan, X.-Y., Qu, C.-M., Li, J.-N., Chen, L., & Liu, L.-Z. (2015) · doi:10.1016/s2095-3119(14)60958-8 · Cited by 13
Tutua, S., Xu, Z.-H., & Blumfield, T. (2014) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-013-1951-2 · Cited by 13
“4) indicated that gs was the main driver of the δ 13C variations across the treatments in 2000 (Fischer et al. 1998; Barbour et al. 2000; Scheidegger et al. 2000).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialResponses of old and modern cereals to CO2-fertilisation
Franzaring, J., Holz, I., & Fangmeier, A. (2013) · Australian Journal of Agricultural Research · doi:10.1071/cp13311 · Cited by 14
“Stand-related features that affect atmospheric connectivity and canopy temperature have also seen positive changes over time (Fischer et al. 1998), while Sadras et al.”
BackgroundZhu, L., Li, S., Liang, Z.-S., Zhang, Z.-F., & Xu, X. (2010) · doi:10.1071/cp10002 · Cited by 13
“1071/ PP9840539 Fischer RA (1998) Wheat yield progress associated with higher stomatal conductance and photosynthetic rate, and cooler canopies.”
BackgroundInfluentialKoç, M., Barutçular, C., & Tiryakioğlu, M. (2008) · doi:10.1002/jsfa.3261 · Cited by 13
Qin, X., Wang, H., He, Y., Li, Y., Li, Z.-G., Gao, Q.-Z., Wan, Y.-F., Qian, B., McConkey, B., DePauw, R., et al. (2018) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/j.eja.2017.12.005 · Cited by 12
“Fischer et al. (1998) observed that the maximum photosynthetic rate of wheat cultivars released from 1962 to 1998 increased 23%.”
BackgroundEfficacy of Rhizobia for Improving Photosynthesis, Productivity, and Mineral Nutrition of Maize
Hussain, M. B., Zahir, Z., Asghar, H., Mubaraka, R., & Naveed, M. (2016) · doi:10.1002/clen.201500912 · Cited by 12
Rahman, M. A., Rahman, M., Hasan, M., Begum, F., & Sarker, M. A. (2014) · doi:10.3329/bjar.v39i1.20144 · Cited by 12
“Genotypic difference in green leaf area duration in response to heat stress is also reported by other researchers (Stone and Nicolas, 1998; Fisher et al., 1998; Rahman et al., 2009).”
ResultLower Canopy Temperature is Associated with Higher Cytokinin Concentration in the Flag Leaf of Wheat
Fang, J.-J., Ma, W.-Y., Zhao, X.-Q., He, X., Li, B., Tong, Y., & Li, Z.-S. (2012) · doi:10.2135/cropsci2012.03.0163 · Cited by 12
Association of root water-uptake ability with drought adaptation in wheat
Mori, M., Inagaki, M., Inoue, T., & Nachit, M. (2011) · doi:10.1556/crc.39.2011.4.10 · Cited by 12
Grassini, P., Menza, N. C. L., Edreira, J. I. R., Monzón, J. P., Tenorio, F. A., & Specht, J. E. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819194-1.00008-6 · Cited by 60
High-Precision Phenotyping Under Controlled Versus Natural Environments
Basu, P., Srivastava, M., Singh, P., Porwal, P., Kant, R., & Singh, J. (2015) · doi:10.1007/978-81-322-2226-2_3 · Cited by 12
“However, measuring gas exchange parameters and CER/gs (Carbon dioxide exhange rate/Stomatal conductance) in controlled conditions may considerably limit the effect of environmental variation (Poorter and Farquhar 1994; Kalapos et al. 1996; Fischer et al. 1998).”
BackgroundInfluentialMcAusland, L., Vialet‐Chabrand, S., Matthews, J. S. A., & Lawson, T. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20517-5_5 · Cited by 16
Comparison of Photosynthetic Components of Wheat Genotypes Under Rain‐fed and Irrigated Conditions
Khamssi, N. N., & Najaphy, A. (2012) · Photochemistry and Photobiology · doi:10.1111/j.1751-1097.2011.01008.x · Cited by 12
“Wheat yield was improved under drought conditions by higher gs (28).”
BackgroundMohi-Ud-Din, M., Hossain, M. A., Rohman, M., Uddin, M., Haque, M., Ahmed, J., Abdullah, H. M., Hossain, M. A., & Pessarakli, M. (2022) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.14421 · Cited by 11
An Analysis of the Genetic Relation between Photosynthesis and Yield-Related Traits in Wheat
An, Q., Li, C.-L., Li, H.-W., Zheng, Q., Li, B., & Li, Z.-S. (2022) · Agriculture · doi:10.3390/agriculture12040560 · Cited by 11
Chang-Espino, M., González-Fernández, I., Alonso, R., Araus, J., & Bermejo-Bermejo, V. (2021) · Atmosphere · doi:10.3390/atmos12070883 · Cited by 11
“Achieving a higher GY in modern and old CVs was possibly not only due to a higher HI, but also a higher gs, which favoured photosynthetic activity and caused the more negative δ13C values in the newer genotypes [31,42,65].”
BackgroundMatsunaga, S., Yamasaki, Y., Toda, Y., Mega, R., Akashi, K., & Tsujimoto, H. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms22136942 · Cited by 11
“To overcome heat stress, wheat plants can lower canopy temperature by opening stomata to activate transpiration [6].”
BackgroundBoll-leaf system gas exchange and its application in the analysis of cotton photosynthetic function
Chen, M., Liang, F., Yan, Y., Wang, Y., Zhang, Y.-L., Tian, J.-S., Jiang, C.-D., & Zhang, W.-F. (2021) · Photosynthesis Research · doi:10.1007/s11120-021-00856-w · Cited by 11
Huang, J. J., D’Souza, C., & Zhou, W.-B. (2021) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2021.623682 · Cited by 11
Jalakas, P., Tulva, I., Kangor, T., Soovali, P., Rasulov, B., Tamm, U., Koppel, M., Kollist, H., & Merilo, E. (2018) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/j.eja.2018.07.001 · Cited by 11
Kottmann, L., Schittenhelm, S., & Giesemann, A. (2014) · doi:10.1111/pbr.12198 · Cited by 11
Romdhane, W. B., Al-ashkar, I., Ibrahim, A., Sallam, M., Al-Doss, A., & Hassairi, A. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30933 · Cited by 10
“There was a strong correlation between the leaf gas exchange rate and leaf CT [49].”
Zhan, X., Yang, Q.-C., Wang, S., Wang, Y., Fan, X.-X., & Bian, Z.-H. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms242015054 · Cited by 10
“Apparent mesophyll conductance (g m ) was calculated as P n /C i [45], where C i is intercellular CO 2 concentration.”
MethodWu, A. C., Brider, J., Busch, F. A., Chen, M., Chenu, K., Clarke, V. C., Collins, B., Ermakova, M., Evans, J. R., Farquhar, G. D., et al. (2022) · Plant Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/pce.14453 · Cited by 74
“Despite efforts in leaf photosynthetic engineering and pot/field studies, knowledge of how manipulations can influence yield performance in target crops grown across multiple environments is limited (Fischer et al., 1998).”
In vitro salinity stress mediates grass pea genotypes' (Lathyrus sativus L.) responses
Khosravi, Z., Pourmohammad, A., Aliloo, A., Shahabivand, S., Hassanpouraghdam, M., & Topçu, H. (2022) · Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences · doi:10.55730/1300-011x.3007 · Cited by 10
“If the RDI is >1, the genotype is relatively stress-tolerant, and RDI<1 indicates a relatively stress-sensitive genotype (Fischer et al., 1998).”
BackgroundYang, K. F., Gergel, S. E., Chavarría, J.-Y. D., & Baudron, F. (2020) · Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.3389/fsufs.2020.00130 · Cited by 9
“Both the grain filling and antithesis development stages of wheat are significantly affected by water availability and temperature (Fischer et al., 1998; Gooding et al., 2003).”
BackgroundGenetic and physiological bases for variation in water use efficiency in canola
Raman, H., Raman, R., McVittie, B., Borg, L., Diffey, S., Yadav, A. S., Balasubramanian, S., & Farquhar, G. (2020) · Food and Energy Security · doi:10.1002/fes3.237 · Cited by 10
“…grain yields under water-limited conditions (Adiredjo et al., 2014; Blum et al., 1989; Christman et al., 2008; Condon, Farquhar, & Richards, 1990; Fischer et al., 1998; Rebetzke, Botwright, Moore, Richards, & Condon, 2004; Rebetzke, Rattey, Farquhar, Richards, & Condon, 2012;…”
Sánchez-Virosta, Á., & Sánchez-Gómez, D. (2019) · Scientia Horticulturae · doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2019.03.043 · Cited by 10
Saeed, I., Bachir, D. G., Chen, L., & Hu, Y.-G. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0161308 · Cited by 10
“to grain yield, although Pn reduced greatly at this stage as shown in other studies [5, 17].”
BackgroundResultKottmann, L., Schittenhelm, S., Wittich, K., & Wilde, P. (2013) · doi:10.1111/jac.12035 · Cited by 10
Leaf Transpiration Efficiency of Sweet Corn Varieties from Three Eras of Breeding
Bunce, J. (2011) · doi:10.2135/cropsci2010.09.0509 · Cited by 10
“), crop breeding has indirectly greatly increased leaf stomatal conductance (gs) (Fisher et al., 1998; Jiang et al., 2003).”
BackgroundImproving photosynthesis in agricultural environments.
Paul, M. J., Singh, G., Puranik, S., Griffiths, C., & Reynolds, M. (2025) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2025.11.008 · Cited by 9
Yield potential and stress adaptation are not mutually exclusive: wheat as a case study
del Pozo, A., Sadras, V. O., & Araus, J. L. (2025) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2025.07.012 · Cited by 13
Advancing sustainable water use across the agricultural life cycle in the USA
Malik, H. T., Zvulunov, Y., Kinnebrew, E., Gates, T. K., Evett, S. R., VanderRoest, J. P., Radian, A., Chi, J., Abhijith, G. R., Mueller, N. D., et al. (2025) · Nature Water · doi:10.1038/s44221-025-00450-7 · Cited by 12
“Within a given crop type, different cultivars can vary in their water use 19 , and the development and adoption of limited transpiration cultivars could decrease water use during periods of high evaporative demand to increase yields in drought-prone regions 20,21 .”
Lessons from the Varietal Evolution of Durum Wheat in Italy
Careddu, M. L., Giunta, F., & Motzo, R. (2023) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy14010087 · Cited by 13
Pozo, A., Méndez-Espinoza, A., Garriga, M., Estrada, F., Castillo, D., Matus, I., & Lobos, G. (2023) · Planta · doi:10.1007/s00425-023-04163-7 · Cited by 9
Buckley, T., Frehner, E., & Bailey, B. N. (2023) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.18739 · Cited by 9
“Stomatal behavior influences forest and crop productivity, hydrology, and climate (e.g. Fischer et al ., 1998; Reichstein et al ., 2002; Bonan, 2008; Choat et al ., 2012; Anderegg et al ., 2016).”
Half Diallel Analysis and Heat Stress Tolerance Indices for Grain Yield in Bread Wheat
Fouad, H., Mohamed, M., Salim, M., Mohiy, M., & El-Mageed, M. A. (2022) · Journal of Plant Production · doi:10.21608/jpp.2022.161348.1168 · Cited by 9
“…Yp (Farshadfar and Javadinia, 2011) 9- Heat resistance index (HI) = [(Ys (Ys/Yp)]/ Y̅𝑠 (Lan, 1988) 10- Relative heat index (RHI) = [(Ys/Yp)/ (Y̅𝑠/Y̅𝑝)] (Fischer et al., 1998) Modified stress tolerance index (MSTI) = K.STI (Farshadfar and Sutka, 2002) 11- K1MSTI = (Yp 2 /Y̅p 2) x STI 12-…”
BackgroundSuleiman, S. O., Habila, D. G., Mamadou, F., Abolanle, B. M., & Olatunbosun, A. N. (2022) · Agricultural Water Management · doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107507 · Cited by 9
ZHANG, H., TU, Y., Kang, J. H., Song, W., & Zheng, L. (2021) · Photosynthetica · doi:10.32615/ps.2021.046 · Cited by 9
“Apparent mesophyll conductance (the conductance of CO2 from the stomatal cavity to the chloroplast) was calculated as the ratio of PN to Ci (Fischer et al. 1998).”
MethodKadhem, M. (2017) · IRAQI JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES · doi:10.36103/ijas.v48ispecial.244 · Cited by 9
Liu, Y.-X., Liang, X., Zhou, F., & Zhang, Z.-M. (2017) · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2017.08.005 · Cited by 9
Ramya, K., Jain, N., Gandhi, N., Arora, A., Singh, P., Singh, A., Singh, G., & Prabhu, K. (2015) · Plant genetic resources · doi:10.1017/s1479262115000532 · Cited by 9
“There is a strong relationship between SC and CT since SC has a direct effect on transpirational cooling (Amani et al., 1996; Fischer et al., 1998).”
BackgroundWang, L., & Shangguan, Z. (2015) · doi:10.1080/01140671.2014.994644 · Cited by 9
Genetic variation in leaf chlorophyll content of Jatropha curcas L.
Senger, E., Peyrat, A., Martín, M. Á., & Montes, J. M. (2014) · Industrial Crops and Products · doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.04.003 · Cited by 11
Strategies for Selecting Drought Tolerant Germplasm in Forage Legume Species
Acuña, H., Inostroza, L., & Tapia, G. (2012) · doi:10.5772/30744 · Cited by 9
Diferenças Varietais nas Características Fotossintéticas de Pennisetum purpureum Schum
da Silva, M. M. P., Vásquez, H., Bressan-Smith, R., da Silva, J. F. C., & Erbesdobler, E. D. (2001) · doi:10.1590/s1516-35982001000800003 · Cited by 9
Fioreze, S. L., & Rodrigues, J. (2012) · Revista Brasileira de Ciências Agrárias - Brazilian Journal of Agricultural Sciences · doi:10.5039/agraria.v7i1a1594 · Cited by 9
Huang, J. J., Tan, C., & Zhou, W.-B. (2024) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2024.108715 · Cited by 8
Pulse ideotypes for abiotic constraint alleviation in Australia
Rao, S. A., Silva‐Pérez, V., Armstrong, R. D., Tefera, A. T., Brand, J., Riffkin, P. A., & Rosewarne, G. M. (2023) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-023-06159-4 · Cited by 15
“Stomata closure is another drought adaptation trait as it is the first response from plants sensing water stress and can be assessed in the short term by measuring gas exchange, canopy temperature (Fischer et al. 1998) and carbon isotope discrimination over a longer term (Condon et al. 2004).”
BackgroundMahmood, Y. A., DeSilva, J., King, I. P., King, J., & Foulkes, J. M. (2023) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/j.eja.2023.126846 · Cited by 12
Soni, A., & Munjal, R. (2023) · Australian Journal of Agricultural Research · doi:10.1071/cp22119 · Cited by 6
“CT can thus be employed as a proxy for stomatal characteristics such as stomatal conductance, stomatal aperture, or leaf porosity, and indirectly, photosynthetic rate (Amani et al. 1996; Fischer et al. 1998; Jones 2004; Maes and Steppe 2012).”
MethodRamya, K., Bellundagi, A., Harikrishna, Rai, N., Jain, N., Singh, P., Arora, A., Singh, G., & Prabhu, K. (2021) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2021.658443 · Cited by 8
“There is a strong relationship between stomatal conductance and canopy temperature, since stomatal conductance has a direct effect on transpirational cooling (Amani et al., 1996; Fischer et al., 1998).”
BackgroundAssociation between physiological and agronomic traits and selection of tropical wheat
Mezzomo, H., Casagrande, C. R., Silva, C. M., Borém, A., & Nardino, M. (2020) · Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s12892-020-00069-y · Cited by 8
Langat, C., Ombori, O., Cheruiyot, R., Gathaara, M., Karanja, D., & Leley, P. (2019) · International Annals of Science · doi:10.21467/ias.8.1.75-86 · Cited by 8
Trait-based responses of seven annual crops to elevated CO2and water limitation
McGranahan, D. A., & Poling, B. (2018) · Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems · doi:10.1017/s1742170517000692 · Cited by 8
Mohammady, S., Aminian, R., Hoshmand, S., & Khodombashi, M. (2012) · Crop and Pasture Science · doi:10.1071/cp12050 · Cited by 8
“Some field experiments have been carried out to evaluate the relationship between grain yield and D under well-watered conditions (Condon et al. 1987; Fischer et al. 1998; Voltas et al. 1999; Rebetzke et al. 2006).”
BackgroundBİTKİ ÖRTÜSÜ SERİNLİĞİ VE KLOROFİL MİKTARININ MAKARNALIK BUĞDAY ISLAHINDA KULLANIM OLANAKLARI
Yıldırım, M., Akıncı, C., Koç, M., & Barutçular, C. (2009) · \n Volume: 24, Issue: 3\n 158-166\n \n · doi:10.7161/anajas.2009.24.3.158-166 · Cited by 8
Kafi, M., Griffiths, H., Nezami, A., Khazaei, H., & Sharif, A. (2007) · doi:10.3923/ajps.2007.1166.1173 · Cited by 8
Consideration of Crop Responses to Environment in Plant Breeding
Hall, A. (2000) · doi:10.1201/9781420041088.ch13 · Cited by 8
Effect of drought stress on epicuticular wax load in peanut genotypes
Solanki, J., & Sarangi, S. (2015) · Journal of Applied Biology & Biotechnology · doi:10.7324/jabb.2015.3410 · Cited by 8
Quantitative trait loci controlling root and shoot traits of maize under drought stress
Ruta, N. (2008) · ETH Zürich Research Collection · doi:10.3929/ethz-a-005769781 · Cited by 8
Mosalam, M., Nemr, R. A., Aljabri, M., Said, A. A., & El-Soda, M. (2025) · BMC Plant Biology · doi:10.1186/s12870-025-06413-0 · Cited by 7
Evaluation of physio-biochemical traits in bread wheat RILs for terminal heat stress
Redhu, M., Singh, V., Kumari, A., Munjal, R., Nimbal, S., Niwas, R., Yashveer, S., Verma, S., Langaya, S., Devi, S., et al. (2025) · Cereal research communications · doi:10.1007/s42976-024-00623-2 · Cited by 7
“(Fischer et al. 1998) also delineated similar findings about the relationship of gs with A and CTD.”
Photosynthetic responses of switchgrass to light and CO 2 under different precipitation treatments
Kieffer, C., Kaur, N., Li, J., Matamala, R., Fay, P. A., & Hui, D. (2024) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.13138 · Cited by 8
Optimization of carbon and nitrogen partitioning in DP202216 maize hybrids
Palmero, F., Fernández, J. A., Habben, J., Schüssler, J., Masek, T., Weers, B. P., Bing, J., Hefley, T., Prasad, P. V. V., & Ciampitti, I. (2024) · Field crops research (Print) · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2024.109345 · Cited by 7
Exploring the Drought Tolerant Quantitative Trait Loci in Spring Wheat
Wang, Z., Lai, X., Wang, C., Yang, H., Liu, Z., Fan, Z., Li, J., Zhang, H., Liu, M., & Zhang, Y. (2024) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants13060898 · Cited by 10
“Genotypes with high yield stability index [18] and relative drought index [19] values are generally regarded as stable under stress and non-stress conditions.”
BackgroundRezzouk, F. Z., Gracia-Romero, A., Segarra, J., Kefauver, S., Aparicio, N., Serret, M., & Araus, J. (2023) · Agricultural Water Management · doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108487 · Cited by 7
Fenstemaker, S., Cho, J.-S., McCoy, J., Mercer, K. L., & Francis, D. (2022) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.947538 · Cited by 7
“For example, genetic variation for canopy temperature in runner beans and wheat is linked to maintaining stomatal conductance in water-limited environments (Fischer et al., 1998; Jones, 1999).”
BackgroundRazzaq, A., Shahid, S., Akram, M., Ashraf, M., Iqbal, S., Hussain, A., Zia, A., Qadri, S., Saher, N., Shahzad, F., et al. (2021) · Complex · doi:10.1155/2021/9938013 · Cited by 7
“…for researchers in plant biology [5]. programs that are working on the improvement of crops have modified stomata phenotypes to increase the yield [6]. stomata easily get affected by external environment conditions and their micromorpho-logical characteristics are often used for plant…”
BackgroundAnalysis of Screening Tools for Drought Tolerance in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Genotypes
Karimizadeh, R., Keshavarzi, K., Karimpour, F., & Sharifi, P. (2021) · Agricultural Science Digest - A Research Journal · doi:10.18805/ag.d-255 · Cited by 7
“…et al., 1996; Blum 1996; Pinter et al., 1990; Fischer et al., 1998; Karimizadeh and Mohammadi, 2011; Karimizadeh et al., 2011; Karimizadeh et al., 2012; Mohammadi et al., 2012) and has been associated with yield increase among wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars at CIMMYT (Fischer et al., 1998).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialMapping Quantitative Trait Loci for Yield Potential Traits in Wheat Recombinant Inbred Lines
Kang, C., Mo, Y., Kim, K.-M., Kim, K.-H., Chun, J., Park, C., & Cho, S.-W. (2020) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy11010022 · Cited by 7
Celik, S., Madenoğlu, S., Sönmez, B., Avağ, K., Türker, U., Çaycı, G., Kütük, A. C., & Heng, L. (2018) · doi:10.3906/tar-1709-31 · Cited by 7
“According to some researchers such as Sternberg et al. (1986), Farquhar et al. (1988), Fischer et al. (1998), Barbour et al. (2000), and Ripullone et al. (2007), the oxygen isotope composition of the plant materials is a sign of the evaporation conditions caused by material situations;…”
BackgroundLi, Z., Bai, W., Zhang, L., & Li, L. (2016) · Photosynthetica (Praha) · doi:10.1007/s11099-016-0222-x · Cited by 7
Kovár, M., Černý, I., & Ernst, D. (2016) · doi:10.1515/agri-2016-0004 · Cited by 7
Use of thermographic imaging to screen for drought-tolerant genotypes in Brachypodium distachyon
Ruiz, M., Quemada, M., García, R. M., Carrillo, J. M., & Benavente, E. (2016) · Crop and Pasture Science · doi:10.1071/cp15134 · Cited by 7
“For diverse crops including wheat, genotypes with greater capacity for leaf cooling and lower canopy temperature have been shown to have a higher yield in hot regions (Radin et al. 1994; Fischer et al. 1998; Costa et al. 2012).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Fischer, R. A., Rees, D., Sayre, K. D., Lu, Z. ‐., Condon, A. G., & Saavedra, A. L.
- Affiliations
- Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (AU)
- Natural Resources Institute (GB)
- Centro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maíz Y Trigo (MX)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
- Cologeio de Postgraduados, Centro de Botanica Montecillo Texcoco Edo de Mexico Mexico
- Corresponding author
- Fischer, R. A.
- Venue
- Crop Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-11
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1467-1475
- ISSN
- 0011-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0653
- OpenAlex
- W2058467808
- Cited by
- 887
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 39
- FWCI
- 33.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Crop Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetics and Plant Breeding
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
- Keywords
- stomatal conductance, photosynthetic rate, canopy temperature depression, carbon isotope discrimination, leaf traits, intercellular CO2 concentration, northwestern Mexico
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review