The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Wheat Yield Progress Associated with Higher Stomatal Conductance and Photosynthetic Rate, and Cooler Canopies
Abstract
Grain yields of eight representative semidwarf spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars released in northwest Mexico between 1962 and 1988 have increased linearly across years as measured in this region during 6 yr under favorable management and irrigation. To understand the physiological basis of this progress and possibly assist future selection for grain yield, leaf traits were determined during 3 yr in the same study. Stomatal conductance (gs), maximum photosynthetic rate (A max, and canopy temperature depression (CTD), averaged over the 3 yr, were closely and positively correlated with progress in the 6‐yr mean yield. The correlation was greatest with gs (r = 0.94, P < 0.01). Compared with the overall yield increase of 27%, gs increased 63%, A max increased 23%, and canopies were 0.6°C cooler. Carbon‐13 isotope discrimination was also positively associated with yield progress (r = 0.71, P < 0.05), but other leaf traits such as flag leaf area, specific leaf weight, percentage N and greeness were not, nor was crop growth rate around anthesis. The causal basis of the leaf activity interrelationships is reasonably clear, with both increased intercellular CO 2 concentration and increased mesophyll activity contributing to the increase in A max. However, causal links to the yield progress, and the accompanying increase in kernels per square meter, are not clear. It is concluded that g s and CTD should be further investigated as potential indirect selection criteria for yield.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For example, a positive association of P N with drought tolerance has been reported in different crops, e.g., semi-dwarf spring wheat (Fischer et al. 1998), maize (Ashraf et al. 2007), transgenic lines of rice (Garg et al. 2002), and transgenic cotton lines (Yan et al. 2004).”
From Photosynthesis under stressful environments: An overview (2013) · cites this paper as Fischer et al. 1998
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 754
Basnayake, J., Jackson, P., Inman-Bamber, N., & Lakshmanan, P. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erv194 · Cited by 72
“Positive genetic correlations between gs and yield, often high, have been observed in other crops under field conditions (Blum et al., 1989; Reynolds et al., 1994; Fischer et al., 1998; Lu et al., 1998; Jiang et al., 2003; Ober et al., 2004; Olivares-Villegas et al., 2007; Bunce, 2010; Takai et al., 2010).”
BackgroundInfluentialMason, R. E., & Singh, R. (2014) · doi:10.3390/agronomy4020191 · Cited by 72
“Experiments investigating CT are often conducted with sets of lines pre-selected for variation in canopy temperature or other tolerance traits [7,8], international trials of elite drought and heat tolerant lines [10,16,18,20], or using historical germplasm [9,19,21] and may not be representative of variation present i…”
BackgroundSerret, M., Ortiz-Monasterio, I., Pardo, A., & Araus, J. (2008) · doi:10.1111/j.1744-7348.2008.00259.x · Cited by 72
A Subsidiary Cell-Localized Glucose Transporter Promotes Stomatal Conductance and Photosynthesis
Wang, H., Yan, S.-J., Xin, H., Huang, W.-J., Zhang, H., Teng, S., Yu, Y.-C., Fernie, A., Lu, X.-D., Li, P., et al. (2019) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.18.00736 · Cited by 71
Guan, X.-K., Song, L., Wang, T.-C., Turner, N., & Li, F.-M. (2015) · doi:10.1111/jac.12103 · Cited by 71
Constitutive differences in water use efficiency between two durum wheat cultivars
Rizza, F., Ghashghaie, J., Meyer, S., Matteu, L., Mastrangelo, A., & Badeck, F.-W. (2012) · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2011.09.001 · Cited by 71
Proteomic changes in rice leaves during development of field‐grown rice plants
Zhao, C.-F., Wang, J.-Q., Cao, M.-L., Zhao, K., Shao, J., Lei, T., Yin, J., Hill, G. G., Xu, N.-Z., & Liu, S.-Q. (2005) · Proteomics · doi:10.1002/pmic.200401131 · Cited by 71
Jiang, G., Sun, J.-Z., Liu, H., Qu, C.-M., Wang, K., Guo, R.-J., Bai, K., Gao, L.-M., & Kuang, T. (2003) · Journal of plant research · doi:10.1007/s10265-003-0115-5 · Cited by 71
“As for physiological features, stomatal conductance ( g s ) (Condon et al. 1987; Dunin et al. 1989; Sayre et al. 1997; Fischer et al. 1998), leaf and spike nitrogen content (Hirose and Werger 1987; Lakkineni et al. 1995; Pan et al. 1995) and even canopy temperature (Amani et al. 1996; Fischer et…”
BackgroundInfluentialGene action of canopy temperature in bread wheat under diverse environments
Saint-Pierre, C., Crossa, J., Manes, Y., & Reynolds, M. (2009) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00122-009-1238-4 · Cited by 71
“Genotypic variation has been reported for CT in wheat (Amani et al. 1996; Ayeneh et al. 2002; Blum et al. 1989; Fischer et al. 1998; Rashid et al. 1999; Reynolds et al. 1994), although little is known about gene action for CT in bread wheat.”
BackgroundMedina, S., Vicente, R., Nieto-Taladriz, M. T., Aparicio, N., Chairi, F., Vergara-Díaz, O., & Araus, J. (2019) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.01994 · Cited by 70
“In other studies in wheat under relatively good agronomical conditions negative correlations of δ13C with gs and grain yield (Fischer et al., 1998; Lu et al., 1998) have been reported.”
BackgroundNakhforoosh, A., Bodewein, T., Fiorani, F., & Bodner, G. (2016) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2016.01155 · Cited by 74
Greer, D. (2012) · AoB Plants · doi:10.1093/aobpla/pls009 · Cited by 70
“Similar results were observed by Fischer et al. (1998) and Lu et al. (1994).”
ResultPhenomics in Crop Plants: Trends, Options and Limitations
Kumar, J., Pratap, A., & Kumar, S. (2015) · Springer India · doi:10.1007/978-81-322-2226-2 · Cited by 69
“The connection of stomatal conductance and yield in wheat was identified as positive in a 6-year study (Fischer et al. 1998).”
BackgroundInfluentialHorie, T., Matsuura, S., Takai, T., Kuwasaki, K., Ohsumi, A., & Shiraiwa, T. (2006) · Plant, Cell and Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01445.x · Cited by 69
Mondal, S., Dutta, S., Crespo-Herrera, L., Huerta-Espino, J., Braun, H., & Singh, R. (2020) · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2020.107757 · Cited by 68
Photons to food: genetic improvement of cereal crop photosynthesis
Furbank, R., Sharwood, R., Estavillo, G., Silva-Pérez, V., & Condon, A. G. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/eraa077 · Cited by 68
“Single point measurements of assimilation rate on flag leaves of spring and winter wheat have been seen to have both a positive and negative correlation with yield and year of release (Murthy and Singh, 1979; Evans, 1993; Reynolds et al., 1994, 2000; Fischer et al., 1998; Fischer et al., 2010; Sadras et al., 2012; Gaj…”
BackgroundSelf-citationElevated temperature altered the reaction norms of stomatal conductance in field-grown grapevine
Sadras, V., Montoro, A., Moran, M., & Aphalo, P. (2012) · Agricultural and Forest Meteorology · doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.06.005 · Cited by 68
“Studies in annual crops further support the notion that regulation of canopy temperature under elevated ambient temperature could override the putative role of stomata in maximising water use efficiency for some combinations of genotypes and environments (Fischer et al., 1998; Nautiyal et al., 2012; Radin et al., 1994…”
BackgroundMondal, S., Mason, R. E., Huggins, T. D., & Hays, D. (2014) · Euphytica · doi:10.1007/s10681-014-1193-2 · Cited by 68
“Fischer et al. (1998) reported an association of cooler canopies with increased photosynthetic rates, implying that cooler canopies under high temperature stress may be potentially beneficial in maintaining photosynthetic activity and grain yield.”
BackgroundEffect of Canopy Temperature Depression on Grain Yield and Yield Components in Bread and Durum Wheat
Bahar, B., Yildirim, M., Barutçular, C., & Genc, I. (2008) · doi:10.15835/nbha36187 · Cited by 68
Mohi-Ud-Din, M., Talukder, D., Rohman, M., Ahmed, J., Jagadish, S. V. K., Islam, T., & Hasanuzzaman, M. (2021) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants10102066 · Cited by 67
“[34] as ambient temperature minus leaf temperature.”
Takai, T., Yano, M., & Yamamoto, T. (2010) · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2009.10.019 · Cited by 67
Reynolds, M. P., Calderini, D. F., Condon, A. G., & Vargas, M. (2007) · The Journal of Agricultural Science · doi:10.1017/s0021859607006831 · Cited by 61
Self-citationLi, Y., Shi, H., Zhou, L., Eamus, D., HUETE, A. R., Li, L., Cleverly, J., Hu, Z., Harahap, M., Yu, Q., et al. (2018) · Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences · doi:10.1029/2018jg004482 · Cited by 74
Gupta, P., Balyan, H., Gahlaut, V., & Kulwal, P. (2012) · Plant breeding reviews · doi:10.1002/9781118358566.ch2 · Cited by 66
González, A., Bermejo, V., & Gimeno, B. (2010) · Journal of Agricultural Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0021859610000031 · Cited by 66
“Studies performed on different crops have indicated that the improvement of yield is associated with increased photosynthetic capacity (Fischer et al. 1998; Morrison et al. 1999; Reynolds et al. 2000, 2007; Ding et al. 2005).”
BackgroundFrom green to gold: agricultural revolution for food security
Evans, J. R., & Lawson, T. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/eraa110 · Cited by 93
Willick, I. R., Lahlali, R., Vijayan, P., Muir, D., Karunakaran, C., & Tanino, K. K. (2017) · Physiologia Plantarum · doi:10.1111/ppl.12637 · Cited by 71
Ma, Y.-K., Chun, J., Wang, S.-H., & Chen, F. (2011) · doi:10.4314/ajb.v10i56 · Cited by 65
“At the end of 1980s, Cimmyt began CTD measurements on different irrigated experiments in Northwest Mexico and it was found that phenotypic correlations of CTD with grain yield were occasionally positive (Reynolds et al., 1994; Fischer et al., 1998).”
InfluentialDreccer, M., Schapendonk, A., van Oijen, M., Pot, C., & Rabbinge, R. (2000) · doi:10.1071/pp00019 · Cited by 65
Limitations to photosynthesis under light and heat stress in three high-yielding wheat genotypes.
Monneveux, P., Pastenes, C., & Reynolds, M. (2003) · Journal of plant physiology · doi:10.1078/0176-1617-00772 · Cited by 65
Has long-term selection for yield in durum wheat also induced changes in leaf and canopy traits?
Giunta, F., Motzo, R., & Pruneddu, G. (2008) · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2007.10.018 · Cited by 64
Chivasa, W., Mutanga, O., & Burgueño, J. A. (2021) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2021.106128 · Cited by 77
Abscisic Acid Receptors and Coreceptors Modulate Plant Water Use Efficiency and Water Productivity
Yang, Z., Liu, J., Porée, F., Schäufele, R., Helmke, H., Frackenpohl, J., Lehr, S., von Koskull‐Döring, P., Christmann, A., Schnyder, H., et al. (2019) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.18.01238 · Cited by 68
“However, in other studies, selection of a high WUE trait in 459 wheat was associated with reduced growth and yield in favorable environments (Condon et al., 2004; 460 Morgan et al., 1993; Fischer et al., 1998) though introgression of a genomic region conferred high WUE 461 and increased biomass production in water-lim…”
BackgroundSHORTROOT-Mediated Increase in Stomatal Density Has No Impact on Photosynthetic Efficiency1[CC-BY]
Schuler, M. L., Sedelnikova, O., Walker, B. J., Westhoff, P., & Langdale, J. (2017) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.17.01005 · Cited by 63
“…density and the size of the stomatal pore determine stomatal conductance to CO2 and water, and thus strongly correlate with photosynthetic capacity (Fischer et al., 1998; Franks et al., 2009; Franks andBeerling, 2009), it has been hypothesized that increased stomatal density could increase…”
BackgroundOxygen isotope enrichment (Delta(18)O) reflects yield potential and drought resistance in maize.
Cabrera-Bosquet, L., Sánchez, C., & Araus, J. (2009) · Plant, Cell and Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02013.x · Cited by 63
“Barbour et al. (2000) found similar results in a set of eight bread wheat genotypes grown under WW conditions, where genotypes with the highest gs and lower leaf temperatures (Fischer et al. 1998) also had the lowest D18O values and were the most productive.”
Resultdel Pozo, A., Matus, I. A., Serret, M. D., & Araus, J. L. (2013) · Environmental and Experimental Botany · doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2013.09.016 · Cited by 63
Zhu, G., Midmore, D., Radford, B. J., & Yule, D. (2004) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2004.01.014 · Cited by 62
Methods for Creating Stomatal Impressions Directly onto Archivable Slides
Gitz, D., & Baker, J. (2009) · doi:10.2134/agronj2008.0143n · Cited by 62
Valluru, R., Davies, W., Reynolds, M., & Dodd, I. (2016) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2016.00461 · Cited by 61
Photosynthesis, sucrose metabolism, and starch accumulation in two NILs of winter wheat
Wang, B., Ma, M., Lu, H., Meng, Q., Li, G., & Yang, X. (2015) · Photosynthesis Research · doi:10.1007/s11120-015-0126-9 · Cited by 62
“Some scientists believe that there is a positive correlation between the photosynthetic rate and crop yield (Blum 1990; Fischer et al. 1998; Murchie et al. & Xinghong Yang xhyang@sdau.edu.cn 1 State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Shandong Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Shandong Agricultural…”
BackgroundWater–Nitrogen Colimitation in Grain Crops
Cossani, C. M., & Sadras, V. O. (2018) · Advances in agronomy · doi:10.1016/bs.agron.2018.02.004 · Cited by 80
Genetic variation for photosynthetic capacity and efficiency in spring wheat
Silva-Pérez, V., Faveri, J. D., Molero, G., Deery, D., Condon, A. G., Reynolds, M., Evans, J., & Furbank, R. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erz439 · Cited by 60
“Positive relationships between A and yield have been reported (Reynolds et al., 1994, 2000; Fischer et al., 1998; Tang et al., 2017), but contrasting results have been obtained in high-yielding cultivars (Brinkman and Frey, 1978; Murthy and Singh, 1979; Gifford and Evans, 1981; Sadras et al.”
BackgroundResultSelf-citationKrishna, G., Sahoo, R., Singh, P., Patra, H., Bajpai, V., Das, B., Kumar, S., Dhandapani, R., Vishwakarma, C., Pal, M., et al. (2019) · Geocarto International · doi:10.1080/10106049.2019.1618922 · Cited by 60
Li, X., Ingvordsen, C., Weiss, M., Rebetzke, G., Condon, A., James, R. A., & Richards, R. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erz232 · Cited by 60
Self-citationNatural genetic variation for morphological and molecular determinants of plant growth and yield
Nunes‐Nesi, A., Nascimento, V. L., Silva, F. M. D. O., Zsögön, A., Araújo, W. L., & Ronan Sulpice, A. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erw124 · Cited by 67
Chemical manipulation of plant water use
Helander, J. D. M., Vaidya, A. S., & Cutler, S. R. (2015) · Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2015.11.010 · Cited by 65
Breeding for Yield Potential has Increased Deep Soil Water Extraction Capacity in Irrigated Wheat
Pask, A., & Reynolds, M. (2013) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci2013.01.0011 · Cited by 60
“Even in studies comparing cultivars that show genetic gains in yield independently of biomass, different estimates of transpiration efficiency (TE)—including stomatal conductance (Gs), canopy temperature (CT), and C isotope discrimination (CID)—suggested that superior cultivars were in fact extracting more water from…”
BackgroundInfluentialBread and Durum Wheat under Heat Stress: A Comparative Study on the Photosynthetic Performance
Dias, A. S., Semedo, J. N., Ramalho, J. C., & Lidon, F. C. (2010) · Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science · doi:10.1111/j.1439-037x.2010.00442.x · Cited by 65
Monneveux, P., Reynolds, M., Aguilar, J., & Singh, R. (2003) · doi:10.1046/j.1439-0523.2003.00856.x · Cited by 60
Han, H., Bai, L., Su, J., Zhang, J., Song, L., Gao, A., Yang, X., Li, X., Liu, W., & Li, L. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0091066 · Cited by 59
“The improvement in photosynthesis per unit leaf area was correlated with increases in the harvest index and kernel number per square meter [56].”
BackgroundKumari, M., Singh, V., Tripathi, R., & Joshi, A. (2007) · doi:10.1007/1-4020-5497-1_44 · Cited by 59
“CTD has been used as an efficient selection criterion to assess heat tolerance since one single reading integrates scores of leaves (Reynolds et al. 1994, 1998, Fischer et al. 1998, Amani et al. 1996).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPost-green revolution genetic advance in durum wheat: The case of Spain
Chairi, F., Vergara‐Díaz, O., Vatter, T., Aparicio, N., Nieto‐Taladriz, M. T., Kefauver, S. C., Bort, J., Serret, M. D., & Araus, J. L. (2018) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2018.09.003 · Cited by 68
Stress physiology: abiotic stresses
Lakshmanan, P., & Robinson, N. (2013) · doi:10.1002/9781118771280.ch16 · Cited by 58
Sinclair, T., & Jamieson, P. (2008) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2007.07.003 · Cited by 58
Drought Resistance and Its Improvement
Blum, A. (2010) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-7491-4_3 · Cited by 78
Gailing, O., Langenfeld-Heyser, R., Polle, A., & Finkeldey, R. (2008) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01621.x · Cited by 60
“Similarly, yields were positively correlated with maximum stomatal conductance in wheat and cotton (Fischer et al., 1998; Lu et al., 1998).”
BackgroundMid-Season Prediction of Wheat-Grain Yield Potential Using Plant, Soil, and Sensor Measurements
Girma, K., Martin, K., Anderson, R., Arnall, D. B., Brixey, K., Casillas, M., Chung, B., Dobey, B. C., Kamenidou, S., Kariuki, S., et al. (2006) · doi:10.1080/01904160600649187 · Cited by 57
Molecular approaches for designing heat tolerant wheat
Kumar, S., Kumari, P., Kumar, U., Grover, M., Singh, A. K., SINGH, R. D., & Sengar, R. S. (2013) · Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s13562-013-0229-3 · Cited by 62
“Genetic diversity for heat stress tolerance has been reported in wheat by several researchers (Howarth 1989; Fokar et al. 1998; Blum 1986, 1988; Fisher et al. 1998; Reynolds et al. 1994, 1997; Shanahan et al. 1990) however a small portion of the genetic variation has been utilized so far due to limitation of conventio…”
BackgroundMueller, N. D., Rhines, A. N., Butler, E. E., Ray, D. K., Siebert, S., Holbrook, N. M., & Huybers, P. (2017) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/jcli-d-17-0096.1 · Cited by 62
“…transpiration char-89 6 acteristics, as more recent cultivars tend to have higher rates of stomatal conductance and lower90 canopy temperatures (Fischer et al. 1998; Barker et al. 2005; Roche 2015).91 Given that the pace of cropland expansion has been relatively slow since 1950 (Ramankutty…”
BackgroundZhou, B., Sanz‐Sáez, Á., Elazab, A., Shen, T., Sánchez‐Bragado, R., Bort, J., Serret, M. D., & Araus, J. L. (2013) · Journal of Integrative Plant Biology · doi:10.1111/jipb.12148 · Cited by 58
Fois, S., Motzo, R., & Giunta, F. (2009) · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2008.07.004 · Cited by 55
Kondo, M., Pablico, P., Aragones, D., & Agbisit, R. (2004) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-005-4884-6 · Cited by 55
Krishnamurthy, L., Kashiwagi, J., Tobita, S., Ito, O., Upadhyaya, H., Gowda, C. L. L., Gaur, P., Sheshshayee, M., Singh, S., Vadez, V., et al. (2013) · Functional Plant Biology · doi:10.1071/fp13088 · Cited by 53
Phenotyping of rice in salt stress environment using high-throughput infrared imaging
Siddiqui, Z. S., Cho, J.-I., Park, S.-H., Kwon, T., Lee, G.-S., Jeong, M., Kim, K.-W., Lee, S.-K., & Park, S.-C. (2014) · Acta Botanica Croatica · doi:10.2478/botcro-2013-0027 · Cited by 52
“The ranking of the genotypes based on the growth study and thermal IR measurements was consistent (JAMES et al. 2008) and both have been successfully deployed in wheat breeding for both drought and heat screening (FISCHER et al. 1998, REYNOLDS et al. 1998, BRENNAN et al. 2007).”
MethodZhang, H.-F., Xu, W.-G., Wang, H.-W., Hu, L., Li, Y., Qi, X.-L., Zhang, L., Li, C.-X., & Hua, X.-H. (2014) · Protoplasma · doi:10.1007/s00709-014-0624-1 · Cited by 52
“There are no reports that C4specific pepc and ppdk genes improve thermostability, so we hypothesized that enhanced stomatal conductance reduced the leaf temperature, which also improved the photosynthetic performance of C3 transgenic plants (Fischer et al. 1998; Ku et al. 2001).”
BackgroundIdentification of quantitative trait loci for δ13C and productivity in irrigated lowland rice
Laza, M., Kondo, M., Ideta, O., Barlaan, E., & Imbe, T. (2006) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci2005.05.0084 · Cited by 52
Gene action for leaf conductance in three wheat crosses
Rebetzke, G. J., Condon, A. G., Richards, R. A., & Farquhar, G. D. (2003) · Australian Journal of Agricultural Research · doi:10.1071/ar02151 · Cited by 53
Self-citationWu, A., Brider, J., Busch, F. A., Chen, M., Chenu, K., Clarke, V., Collins, B., Ermakova, M., Evans, J., Farquhar, G., et al. (2022) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2022.07.06.498957 · Cited by 51
“…enhanced photosynthesis from elevated CO2 under non-stress conditions (Ainsworth & Long, 2021), but causal physiological links between leaf photosynthesis and crop yield need to be further unravelled and assessed in broader environmental conditions to predict yield credibly (Fischer et al., 1998).”
BackgroundRamamoorthy, P., Krishnamurthy, L., Upadhyaya, H. D., Vadez, V., & Varshney, R. K. (2016) · Functional Plant Biology · doi:10.1071/fp16154 · Cited by 59
“Efficient water uptake ability was found to be essential for yield improvement (Fischer et al. 1998;Blum2009;Wasson et al. 2012) and this efficiency is recognised to rely on the size and activity of the root system (Gregory 1994; Gowda et al. 2012).”
BackgroundGenetic Improvement in Grain Yield and other Traits of Wheat Grown in Western Canada
Iqbal, M., Moakhar, N. P., Strenzke, K., Haile, T., Pozniak, C., Hucl, P., & Spaner, D. (2016) · doi:10.2135/cropsci2015.06.0348 · Cited by 51
Paralog editing tunes rice stomatal density to maintain photosynthesis and improve drought tolerance
Karavolias, N. G., Patel-Tupper, D., Seong, K., Tjahjadi, M., Gueorguieva, G.-A., Tanaka, J., Cruz, A. G., Liebermann, S., Litvak, L., Dahlbeck, D., et al. (2021) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2021.12.21.473329 · Cited by 50
Deery, D., Rebetzke, G., Jiménez-Berni, J., Bovill, W., James, R. A., Condon, A. G., Furbank, R., Chapman, S., & Fischer, R. (2019) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.00875 · Cited by 50
“, 2015), and higher stomatal conductance and maximum photosynthetic rate in the CIMMYT wheat breeding program (Fischer et al., 1998).”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationBiomass production and water use efficiency in perennial grasses during and after drought stress
Sørensen, K. K., Lærke, P. E., Baadsgaard, H., Andersen, M. N., Kristensen, K., Münnich, C., Didion, T., Jensen, E. S., Mårtensson, L.-M. D., & Jørgensen, U. (2017) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12464 · Cited by 53
“Previously, a positive correlation between grain yield and D13C in spring wheat has been reported (Fischer et al., 1998).”
BackgroundNeither crop genetics nor crop management can be optimised
Sadras, V. O., & Denison, R. F. (2016) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2016.01.015 · Cited by 62
Yan, C., Ding, Y., Wang, Q., Liu, Z., Li, G., Muhammad, I., & Wang, S. (2010) · Journal of Agricultural Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0021859610000018 · Cited by 50
“…fertilizer application rates resulted in reduced canopy and organ temperatures, the difference between them being up to 2 xC. Similar work on wheat (Fischer et al. 1998) also showed that different genotypes, as well as different fertilizer rates applied to the same genotype, had different…”
BackgroundResources for image-based high-throughput phenotyping in crops and data sharing challenges
Danilevicz, M. F., Bayer, P. E., Nestor, B. J., Bennamoun, M., & Edwards, D. (2021) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1093/plphys/kiab301 · Cited by 61
Chang, C., Lu, J., Zhang, H.-P., Ma, C.-X., & Sun, G. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0145970 · Cited by 49
Quantitative trait loci for stomatal density and size in lowland rice
Laza, M., Kondo, M., Ideta, O., Barlaan, E., & Imbe, T. (2010) · Euphytica · doi:10.1007/s10681-009-0011-8 · Cited by 49
“stomatal conductance on crop growth rate during reproductive period and yield of some crops species (Lu et al. 1994; Fischer et al. 1998) which may be associated with stomatal density.”
BackgroundMerah, O., Monneveux, P., & Deléens, É. (2001) · Environmental and Experimental Botany · doi:10.1016/s0098-8472(00)00081-2 · Cited by 49
Bhardwaj, R., Lone, J. K., Pandey, R., Mondal, N., Dhandapani, R., Meena, S. K., Khan, S., & Gayacharan, C. (2023) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2023.1206451 · Cited by 56
“Studies have shown that lower canopy temperatures promote better yield potential in wheat exposed to elevated temperatures, and CTD is effective in mitigating heat stress in wheat (Amani et al., 1996; Fischer et al., 1998; Mason et al., 2013).”
BackgroundTolerance mechanisms for breeding wheat against heat stress: A review
Sarkar, S., Islam, A. K. M. A., Barma, N., & Ahmed, J. U. (2021) · South African Journal of Botany · doi:10.1016/j.sajb.2021.01.003 · Cited by 64
Effects of Nanochitin on the Enhancement of the Grain Yield and Quality of Winter Wheat.
Xue, W., Han, Y.-L., Tan, J.-F., Wang, Y., Wang, G.-W., & Wang, H. (2017) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.7b00641 · Cited by 48
Abid, G., Hessini, K., Aouida, M., Aroua, I., Baudoin, J.-P., Muhovski, Y., Mergeai, G., Sassı, K., Machraoui, M., Souissi, F., et al. (2017) · BASE · doi:10.25518/1780-4507.13579 · Cited by 53
Differential gene expression of wheat progeny with contrasting levels of transpiration efficiency
Xue, G., McIntyre, C., Chapman, S., Bower, N. I., Way, H., Reverter, A., Clarke, B., & Shorter, R. (2006) · Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/s11103-006-0055-2 · Cited by 48
“Significant variation in TE exists among wheat genotypes (Condon et al. 1990; Fischer et al. 1998).”
BackgroundHonda, S., Ohkubo, S., San, N. S., Nakkasame, A., Tomisawa, K., Katsura, K., Ookawa, T., Nagano, A. J., & Adachi, S. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-86983-9 · Cited by 66
Nakhforoosh, A., NAGEL, K. A., Fiorani, F., & Bodner, G. (2020) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-020-04794-9 · Cited by 60
“(i) Constitutive reduction of branching (less tillering shoots; higher seminal root dominance) going along with functional/physiological changes (photosynthetic capacity of leaves, xylem transport capacity of roots; Fischer et al. 1998; Zhao et al. 2005).”
BackgroundRonga, D., Francia, E., Rizza, F., Badeck, F., Caradonia, F., Montevecchi, G., & Pecchioni, N. (2019) · Scientia Horticulturae · doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2019.108726 · Cited by 51
Systems Responses to Progressive Water Stress in Durum Wheat
Habash, D. Z., Baudo, M., Hindle, M., Powers, S. J., Platel, M. D., Mitchell, R. A. C., Saqi, M. A. S., Rawlings, C., Latiri, K., Araus, J. L., et al. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0108431 · Cited by 57
Sakoda, K., Watanabe, T., Sukemura, S., Kobayashi, S., Nagasaki, Y., Tanaka, Y., & Shiraiwa, T. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-44127-0 · Cited by 46
Dubey, A. K., Kumar, N., Kumar, A., Ansari, M. A., Ranjan, R., Gautam, A., Meenakshi, Sahu, N., Pandey, V., Behera, S. K., et al. (2018) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.12.050 · Cited by 50
Global diurnal and nocturnal parameters of stomatal conductance in woody plants and major crops
Hoshika, Y., Osada, Y., de Marco, A., Peñuelas, J., & Paoletti, E. (2018) · doi:10.1111/geb.12681 · Cited by 46
“Crops have been anthropogenically selected and bred for productivity, and opening stomata can increase productivity (Fischer et al., 1998).”
BackgroundLiu, J.-Y., Basnayake, J., Jackson, P., Chen, X.-K., Zhao, J., Zhao, P.-F., Yang, L., Bai, Y.-D., Xia, H., Zan, F.-G., et al. (2016) · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2016.07.022 · Cited by 46
Modelling ozone stomatal flux of wheat under mediterranean conditions
González-Fernández, I., Bermejo, V., Elvira, S., de la Torre, D. I., González, A., Navarrete, L., Sanz, J., Calvete, H., García-Gómez, H., Lopez, A., et al. (2013) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.10.043 · Cited by 46
Crop productivity as related to single-plant traits at key phenological stages in durum wheat
Pedro, A., Savin, R., & Slafer, G. (2012) · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2012.09.016 · Cited by 46
Brennan, J., Condon, A., van Ginkel, M., & Reynolds, M. (2007) · Journal of Agricultural Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0021859607007009 · Cited by 46
“These stomatal aperturerelated traits (SATs) include stomatal conductance itself or surrogates such as canopy temperature depression (CTD), carbon isotope discrimination (D13C) and oxygen isotope composition (Fischer et al. 1998; Barbour et al. 2000).”
BackgroundSelf-citationBread and durum wheat tolerance under heat stress: A synoptical overview
Dias, A. S., & Lidon, F. C. (2010) · Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.9755/ejfa.v22i6.4660 · Cited by 49
“…stability might prevail (Dias et al., 2010) and, in these circumstances, the variation of the stomatal conductance and transpiration rates further suggested that stomata aperture decrease leaves temperature through a cooling process implicating evaporation (Fischer et al., 1998; Dias et al., 2010).”
BackgroundInfluentialEffects of chilling at different growth stages on rice photosynthesis, plant growth, and yield
Shi, Y., Guo, E., Cheng, X., Wang, L., Shu, J., Yang, X., Ma, H., Zhang, T., Li, T., & Yang, X. (2022) · Environmental and Experimental Botany · doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2022.105045 · Cited by 52
Gautam, A., Prasad, S. S., Jajoo, A., & Ambati, D. (2015) · Agricultural Research · doi:10.1007/s40003-015-0174-6 · Cited by 45
“experiments in Northwest Mexico and found that phenotypic correlations of CT and CTD with grain yield were occasionally positive [6, 12] and suggested to use CT as a selection criterion for tolerance to high temperature stress in wheat breeding.”
Purushothaman, R., Thudi, M., Krishnamurthy, L., Upadhyaya, H., Kashiwagi, J., Gowda, C., & Varshney, R. (2015) · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2015.01.007 · Cited by 45
Xu, X., Yuan, H., Li, S., Trethowan, R., & Monneveux, P. (2007) · doi:10.1111/j.1672-9072.2007.00562.x · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Fischer, R. A., Rees, D., Sayre, K. D., Lu, Z. ‐., Condon, A. G., & Saavedra, A. L.
- Affiliations
- Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (AU)
- Natural Resources Institute (GB)
- Centro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maíz Y Trigo (MX)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
- Cologeio de Postgraduados, Centro de Botanica Montecillo Texcoco Edo de Mexico Mexico
- Corresponding author
- Fischer, R. A.
- Venue
- Crop Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-11
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1467-1475
- ISSN
- 0011-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0653
- OpenAlex
- W2058467808
- Cited by
- 887
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 39
- FWCI
- 33.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Crop Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetics and Plant Breeding
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
- Keywords
- stomatal conductance, photosynthetic rate, canopy temperature depression, carbon isotope discrimination, leaf traits, intercellular CO2 concentration, northwestern Mexico
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review