The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Wheat Yield Progress Associated with Higher Stomatal Conductance and Photosynthetic Rate, and Cooler Canopies
Abstract
Grain yields of eight representative semidwarf spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars released in northwest Mexico between 1962 and 1988 have increased linearly across years as measured in this region during 6 yr under favorable management and irrigation. To understand the physiological basis of this progress and possibly assist future selection for grain yield, leaf traits were determined during 3 yr in the same study. Stomatal conductance (gs), maximum photosynthetic rate (A max, and canopy temperature depression (CTD), averaged over the 3 yr, were closely and positively correlated with progress in the 6‐yr mean yield. The correlation was greatest with gs (r = 0.94, P < 0.01). Compared with the overall yield increase of 27%, gs increased 63%, A max increased 23%, and canopies were 0.6°C cooler. Carbon‐13 isotope discrimination was also positively associated with yield progress (r = 0.71, P < 0.05), but other leaf traits such as flag leaf area, specific leaf weight, percentage N and greeness were not, nor was crop growth rate around anthesis. The causal basis of the leaf activity interrelationships is reasonably clear, with both increased intercellular CO 2 concentration and increased mesophyll activity contributing to the increase in A max. However, causal links to the yield progress, and the accompanying increase in kernels per square meter, are not clear. It is concluded that g s and CTD should be further investigated as potential indirect selection criteria for yield.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For example, a positive association of P N with drought tolerance has been reported in different crops, e.g., semi-dwarf spring wheat (Fischer et al. 1998), maize (Ashraf et al. 2007), transgenic lines of rice (Garg et al. 2002), and transgenic cotton lines (Yan et al. 2004).”
From Photosynthesis under stressful environments: An overview (2013) · cites this paper as Fischer et al. 1998
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 754
Avenues to realize potential of phenomics to accelerate crop breeding for heat tolerance
Basavaraj, P. S., & Rane, J. (2020) · Plant Physiology Reports · doi:10.1007/s40502-020-00552-2 · Cited by 33
Mendanha, T., Rosenqvist, E., Hyldgaard, B. N., Doonan, J., & Ottosen, C. (2020) · Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science · doi:10.1111/jac.12404 · Cited by 26
Herritt, M. T., & Fritschi, F. (2020) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2020.00153 · Cited by 29
Yousfi, S., Gracia-Romero, A., Kellas, N., Kaddour, M., Chadouli, A., Karrou, M., Araus, J., & Serret, M. (2019) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy9060285 · Cited by 26
“In this context, previous studies have shown that a higher CTD is associated with increased wheat yield under irrigated, hot environments [38,67], but also under dryland environments [68].”
Fukuda, A., Kondo, K., Ikka, T., Takai, T., Tanabata, T., & Yamamoto, T. (2018) · Breeding Science · doi:10.1270/jsbbs.17129 · Cited by 26
“…were recorded every 1 min, using a dual-sensor instrument (2119A, Eto Denki, Tokyo, Japan) connected to a data logger (Thermic 2300A, Eto Denki) and a dual-sensor and data logger instrument (THM10-TH, Wako, Osaka, Japan) in a forced-ventilated radiation shield (Fukuoka et al. 2011) in 2014–2016.”
MethodPhysiological processes associated with salinity tolerance in an alfalfa half-sib family
Anower, M., Peel, M., Mott, I. W., & Wu, Y. (2017) · doi:10.1111/jac.12221 · Cited by 26
Early Metabolic and Photosynthetic Responses to Drought Stress in Common and Tepary Bean
Traub, J., Kelly, J., & Loescher, W. (2017) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci2016.09.0746 · Cited by 26
Altuhaish, A. A. K., & Yahya, S. (2014) · doi:10.4308/hjb.21.1.31 · Cited by 26
“Genotypic difference in green leaf area duration in response to heat stress was also reported by Fischer et al. (1998).”
BackgroundMitchell, R., Theobald, J., Parry, M. A. J., & Lawlor, D. (2000) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jexbot/51.suppl_1.391 · Cited by 26
“…to growth there is evidence that breeding has increased stomatalat elevated pC a in wheat was only partial and appears conductance in wheat (Fischer et al., 1998), therebyto occur mostly in older flag leaves and at low N. further increasing the CO2 at the site of carboxylationHowever, in…”
BackgroundPhotosynthetic Efficiency and Crop Yield
Xu, D.-Q., & Shen, Y.-K. (2002) · doi:10.1201/9780203908426.pt10 · Cited by 26
“Positive relationships between leaf photosynthetic rates and plant productivity, indeed, have been reported for dry bean [24], wheat [25,26], soybean [27], blackgram [28], green gram [29], pea [30], cassava [31], grain sorghum [32], upland cotton [33], and asparagus [34].”
BackgroundMulti-Trait Index-Based Selection of Drought Tolerant Wheat: Physiological and Biochemical Profiling
Mohi-Ud-Din, M., Hossain, M. A., Rohman, M., Uddin, M., Haque, M., Tahery, M. H., & Hasanuzzaman, M. (2024) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants14010035 · Cited by 25
Faralli, M., Williams, K., Han, J., Corke, F., Doonan, J., & Kettlewell, P. (2019) · Journal of Plant Growth Regulation · doi:10.1007/s00344-019-09956-3 · Cited by 25
Phenotyping Peanut Genotypes for Drought Tolerance
Luis, J., Ozias-Akins, P., Holbrook, C., Kemerait, R., Snider, J., & Liakos, V. (2016) · doi:10.3146/0095-3679-43.1.36 · Cited by 25
Mateos, L., & Araus, J. (2016) · Agricultural Water Management · doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2015.10.017 · Cited by 25
Cao, X.-Y., Mondal, S., Cheng, D., Wang, C.-G., Liu, A.-F., Song, J.-M., Li, H.-S., Zhao, Z.-D., & Liu, J.-J. (2015) · Acta Physiologiae Plantarum · doi:10.1007/s11738-015-1835-6 · Cited by 25
“Plant height (PH) and spike length was also recorded for each entry; Heat susceptibility index was estimated using the equation given by Fischer and Maurer (1978): HSI ¼ ð1 Yh=YÞ=ð1 Xh=XÞ where Yh and Y are the phenotypic means for each genotype under heat-stressed and control conditions,…”
MethodBort, J., Belhaj, M., Latiri, K., Kehel, Z., & Araus, J. (2013) · Journal of Agricultural Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0021859613000269 · Cited by 25
“A lower δ18O (Barbour et al. 2000a), together with a lower δ13C (Fischer et al. 1998) have been associated with a higher yield potential in bread wheat, suggesting that the genotypes exhibiting higher yield keep their stomata more open and probably exhibit a higher water use.”
BackgroundTiwari, C., Wallwork, H., Dhari, R., Arun, B., Mishra, V., & Joshi, A. (2012) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2012.06.006 · Cited by 25
Zhu, L., Liang, Z.-S., Xu, X., & Li, S.-H. (2008) · doi:10.1111/j.1439-037x.2008.00333.x · Cited by 25
Rahman, M. A., Chikushi, J., Yoshida, S., Yahata, H., & Yasunaga, E. (2005) · doi:10.2480/agrmet.605 · Cited by 25
Impact of climate-driven changes in temperature on stomatal anatomy and physiology
Hofmann, T. A., Atkinson, W., Fan, M.-J., Simkin, A. J., Jindal, P., & Lawson, T. (2025) · Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2024.0244 · Cited by 24
“Conversely, low g s restricts CO 2 uptake and negatively impacts on A [23,24] and biomass accumulation as a consequence [8].”
Photorespiration in plant adaptation to environmental changes
Zhang, Z., Zhu, G., & Peng, X. (2024) · Crop and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.crope.2024.07.001 · Cited by 27
Li, X., Zhao, S., Lin, A., Yang, Y.-Y., Zhang, G.-Z., Xu, P., Wu, Y.-J., & Yang, Z.-C. (2023) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy13071941 · Cited by 24
Katamadze, A., Vergara‐Díaz, O., Uberegui, E., Yoldi‐Achalandabaso, A., Araus, J. L., & Vicente, R. (2023) · The Crop Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cj.2023.06.006 · Cited by 36
Comparative Analysis of Canopy Cooling in Wheat under High Temperature and Drought Stress
Thakur, V., Rane, J., & Nankar, A. (2022) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy12040978 · Cited by 24
“Wheat genotypes with higher grain yield had a cooler canopy under irrigated conditions [14].”
BackgroundChen, R., Xiong, X., & Cheng, W. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-84208-7 · Cited by 24
“Grain filling in wheat depends on two main sources: (1) current assimilates produced by leaf and stem photosynthesis and (2) mobilization of stored carbohydrates and N43.”
BackgroundIdentification of quantitative trait loci associated with canopy temperature in soybean
Bazzer, S., & Purcell, L. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-74614-8 · Cited by 24
Characterization and fine mapping of a leaf yellowing mutant in common wheat
Zhang, H., Chen, Y., Niu, Y., Zhang, X., Zhao, J., Sun, L., Wang, H.-Y., Xiao, J., & Wang, X. (2020) · Plant growth regulation (Print) · doi:10.1007/s10725-020-00633-0 · Cited by 24
Amrutha, S., Parveen, A. M., Muthupandi, M., Sivakumar, V., Nautiyal, R., & Dasgupta, M. G. (2019) · Acta Botanica Croatica · doi:10.2478/botcro-2019-0021 · Cited by 24
“Using leaf temperature as drought index has been reported in potato (Gerhards et al. 2016), maize (Carroll et al. 2017), sorghum (Blume et al. 1978), wheat (Fischer et al. 1998, Talebi 2011), sugarcane (Silva et al. 2007), rice (Hirayama et al. 2006) and Firmiana platanifolia (Yu et al. 2015).”
BackgroundTugendhaft, Y., Eppel, A., Kerem, Z., Barazani, O., Ben-Gal, A., Kadereit, J., & Dag, A. (2016) · doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2015.12.043 · Cited by 24
Zhu, L., Liang, Z.-S., Xu, X., Li, S., & Monneveux, P. (2009) · doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2009.02.018 · Cited by 24
Nocturnal stomatal conductance in wheat is growth stage specific and shows genotypic variation.
McAusland, L., Smith, K. E., Williams, A., Molero, G., & Murchie, E. (2021) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.17563 · Cited by 23
“Stomatal density and measurements of pore length, guard cell width enabled the estimation of anatomical maximum stomatal conductance to water (gsmax; Parlange & Waggoner, 1970; Franks & Beerling, 2009).”
BackgroundWoo, D. K., Riley, W. J., & Wu, Y. (2020) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2020.107756 · Cited by 24
Physiological requirements for wheat ideotypes in response to drought threat
Rybka, K., & Nita, Z. (2015) · Acta Physiologiae Plantarum · doi:10.1007/s11738-015-1844-5 · Cited by 23
“Such a selection resulted in higher yielding genotypes under drought stress (Blum et al. 1982; Izanloo et al. 2008) as well as on sufficiently watered soils (Fischer et al. 1998; Lu et al. 1994; Shimshi and Ephrat 1975).”
BackgroundMethodVariability for Drought Related Traits of Virginia-Type Peanut Cultivars and Advanced Breeding Lines
Balota, M., Isleib, T., & Tallury, S. (2012) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci2012.03.0207 · Cited by 23
Aminian, R., Mohammadi, S., Hoshmand, S., & Khodombashi, M. (2011) · Acta Physiologiae Plantarum · doi:10.1007/s11738-010-0600-0 · Cited by 23
“Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis rate have indicated close and positive correlation with grain yield (Fischer et al. 1998).”
BackgroundVaezi, B., Arzani, A., & Roberts, T. H. (2024) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy14081867 · Cited by 24
Negisho, K., Shibru, S., Matros, A., Pillen, K., Ordon, F., & Wehner, G. (2022) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.838088 · Cited by 22
“Genotypes with high values for yield stability index (YSI) (Bouslama and Schapaugh, 1984) and relative drought index (RDI) (Fischer et al., 1998) are generally regarded as stable under stress and nonstress conditions.”
BackgroundA Deep Learning Method for Fully Automatic Stomatal Morphometry and Maximal Conductance Estimation
Gibbs, J. A., McAusland, L., Robles‐Zazueta, C. A., Murchie, E. H., & Burgess, A. J. (2021) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2021.780180 · Cited by 32
“Indirect agronomic selection has been shown to lead to altered stomatal conductance in wheat (Fischer et al., 1998).”
BackgroundAbebe, G. S., Benjamin, D., Sylvia, H., & Fekadu, G. (2021) · International Journal of Agricultural Science and Food Technology · doi:10.17352/2455-815x.000115 · Cited by 22
“According to [12], the Relative Drought Index (RDI) is a favorable indicator of stress tolerance.”
BackgroundGenetic Advance of Durum Wheat Under High Yielding Conditions: The Case of Chile
del Pozo, A., Matus, I., Ruf, K., Castillo, D., Méndez-Espinoza, A., & Serret, M. (2019) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy9080454 · Cited by 22
Priya, M. S., Siddique, K. H. M., Dhankhar, O. P., Prasad, P. V. V., Rao, B. H., Nair, R. M., & Nayyar, H. (2018) · Indian Journal of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1007/s40502-018-0427-z · Cited by 24
Poersch-Bortolon, L. B., Pereira, J. F., Nhani, A., Gonzales, H. H. S., Torres, G., Consoli, L., Arenhart, R., Bodanese-Zanettini, M., & Margis-Pinheiro, M. (2016) · Genetics and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1590/1678-4685-gmb-2015-0327 · Cited by 22
“eral traits, such as the timing of phenological stages, carbohydrate metabolism, stomatal conductance, osmotic adjustment, late senescence of the flag leaf, flowering time, increased root:shoot ratio, high values of soluble stem carbohydrate shortly after anthesis, and increased early ground cover, among others, have…”
BackgroundStudy on morpho-physiological traits in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Under rainfed condition
Rahman, M., Barma, N., Biswas, B., Khan, A., & Rahman, J. (2016) · doi:10.3329/bjar.v41i2.28227 · Cited by 22
Wild Tetraploid Wheat (Triticum turgidum L.) Response to Heat Stress
Ali, M. B., Ibrahim, A., Hays, D., Ristić, Z., & Fu, J.-M. (2010) · doi:10.1080/15427528.2010.481523 · Cited by 22
“Experiments done under natural field conditions have shown a close association between grain yield of wheat and CTD in hot environments (Reynolds et al. 1994; Fischer et al. 1998).”
BackgroundRosyara, U., Khadka, K., Subedi, S., Sharma, R., & Duveiller, E. (2009) · doi:10.4454/jpp.v91i1.631 · Cited by 22
“Previous studies have shown that total chlorophyll content per unit area is a good indicator of the strength of photosynthetic tissue (Nageswara Rao and Wright, 1994), high photosynthetic rate and maximum photosynthetic activity (Fischer et al., 1998).”
BackgroundMerrium, S., Ali, Z., Habiburrahman, M., Hakeem, S., & Khalid, M. (2022) · Botanical Studies · doi:10.1186/s40529-022-00343-y · Cited by 21
“Genotypes with higher water use efficiency (Fischer et al. 1998; Sarto et al. 2017) are higher-yielding under water stress conditions.”
BackgroundFischer, R. A. (2020) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2020.107782 · Cited by 27
Self-citationWilson, P. B., Rebetzke, G. J., & Condon, A. G. (2015) · Functional Plant Biology · doi:10.1071/fp15228 · Cited by 19
“In years with high rainfall or in irrigated environments, there is often a negative relationship between TE and grain yield (Condon et al. 1987; Fischer et al. 1998).”
BackgroundSelf-citationZhu, L., Li, S.-H., Liang, Z.-S., Xu, X., & Li, Y. (2009) · doi:10.1111/j.1439-037x.2009.00404.x · Cited by 21
GRAIN YIELD AND MORPHO-PHYSIOLOGICAL CHANGES FROM 60 YEARS OF GENETIC IMPROVEMENT OF WHEAT IN IRAN
Miri, H. R. (2009) · Experimental Agriculture · doi:10.1017/s001447970800745x · Cited by 25
Monneveux, P., Reynolds, M., Trethowan, R., Pena, J., & Zapata, F. (2004) · doi:10.1111/j.1439-037x.2004.00115.x · Cited by 21
Diurnal and Seasonal Photosynthesis in Two Asparagus Cultivars with Contrasting Yield
Guo, J.-M., Jermyn, W., & Turnbull, M. (2002) · doi:10.2135/cropsci2002.3990 · Cited by 21
Effects of Temperature and Light on Photosynthetic Heterosis of an Upland Cotton Hybrid Cultivar
Zeng, B., Xu, X.-M., Zhou, S.-Q., Zhu, C.-S., & Tang, C.-M. (2012) · doi:10.2135/cropsci2011.03.0165 · Cited by 21
Mohi-Ud-Din, M., Hossain, M., Rohman, M., Uddin, M., Haque, M., Dessoky, E., Alqurashi, M., & Aloufi, S. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14169818 · Cited by 20
“The canopy temperature depression (CTD) was estimated as the ambient temperature minus the canopy temperature using Fischer’s approach [29].”
MethodMomayyezi, M., Rippner, D., Duong, F., Raja, P., Brown, P., Kluepfel, D., Earles, J. M., Forrestel, E., Gilbert, M., & McElrone, A. (2021) · Plant, Cell and Environment · doi:10.1111/pce.14370 · Cited by 20
“Photosynthesis is a key determinant of crop productivity and positively related to biomass accumulation and yield production (Faralli & Lawson, 2020; Fischer et al., 1998; Kruger & Volin, 2006; Long et al. 2006; Simkin et al. 2019).”
BackgroundGovindasamy, V., George, P., Aher, L., Ramesh, S., Thangasamy, A., Anandan, S., Raina, S., Kumar, M., Rane, J., Annapurna, K., et al. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-06441-3 · Cited by 20
Nakhforoosh, A., Grausgruber, H., Kaul, H., & Bodner, G. (2015) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2015.00570 · Cited by 20
“Fischer et al. (1998) demonstrated the association of leaf photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance with yield progress in CIMMYT wheat genotypes.”
BackgroundSteinmeyer, F. T., Lukáč, M., Reynolds, M. P., & Jones, H. (2013) · Functional Plant Biology · doi:10.1071/fp12362 · Cited by 23
“Under irrigated conditions Fischer et al. (1998) found that grain yields associated well 337 with canopy temperature depression (CTD), leaf conductance (LC) and leaf photosynthetic 338 rate (LPR) in genotypes developed over a 26 year period in Mexico.”
BackgroundRates of yield gain of hard red spring wheat in western Canada
ThomasJulian, B., & GrafRobert, J. (2014) · doi:10.4141/cjps2013-160 · Cited by 20
Khan, H. A., Nakamura, Y., Furbank, R., & Evans, J. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/eraa514 · Cited by 19
Joynson, R., Molero, G., Coombes, B., Gardiner, L.-J., Rivera-Amado, C., Piñera-Chávez, F., Evans, J., Furbank, R., Reynolds, M., & Hall, A. (2020) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2020.06.15.151928 · Cited by 19
Sánchez-Virosta, Á., Lellis, B., Pardo, J., Martínez-Romero, A., Sánchez-Gómez, D., & Domínguez, A. (2020) · doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105886 · Cited by 19
Raman, H., Raman, R., Mathews, K., Diffey, S., & Salisbury, P. (2020) · Crop and Pasture Science · doi:10.1071/cp20046 · Cited by 19
“2007) – or via ‘tolerance’ mechanisms involving water use efficiency (Fischer et al. 1998; Condon et al. 2002; Rebetzke et al. 2002; Raman et al. 2019b).”
BackgroundJavanmard, Z., Kouchaksaraei, M. T., Bahrami, H., Hosseini, S., Modarres-Sanavi, S. A. M., Struve, D., & Ammere, C. (2019) · European Journal of Forest Research · doi:10.1007/s10342-019-01232-z · Cited by 19
Fischer, T. (2019) · Outlook on Agriculture · doi:10.1177/0030727019868484 · Cited by 23
“(2008)), something at least partially linked their clearly greater stomatal conductance (Fischer et al., 1998; Roche, 2015).”
BackgroundInfluentialExploratory use of a UAV platform for variety selection in peanut
Balota, M., & Oakes, J. (2016) · SPIE Commercial + Scientific Sensing and Imaging · doi:10.1117/12.2228872 · Cited by 19
“CT measured with ground-based IR thermometers is an integrated canopy response from whole plant stomatal conductance [6, 7], CO2 assimilation rate [8], leaf architecture, i.”
MethodWang, M., Ellsworth, P., Zhou, J.-F., Cousins, A., & Sankaran, S. (2016) · Talanta: The International Journal of Pure and Applied Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2016.01.062 · Cited by 19
Kumari, S. (2011) · Journal of Agricultural Science · doi:10.5539/jas.v3n1p170 · Cited by 16
“Research aimed at understanding the basis for yield potential improvement (Fischer et al. 1998) has shown a consistent correlation between increases in yield potential achieved for CIMMYT semidwarf varieties and flag-leaf photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance.”
Water-Use Efficiency Under Changing Climatic Conditions
Bhattacharya, A. (2019) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-816209-5.00003-9 · Cited by 41
Genetic Improvement of Grain Crops
Foulkes, J. M., Reynolds, M. P., & Sylvester-Bradley, R. (2009) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-374431-9.00015-3 · Cited by 62
Anderegg, J., Kirchgessner, N., Aasen, H., Zumsteg, O., Keller, B., Zenkl, R., Walter, A., & Hund, A. (2023) · bioRxiv · doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1335037 · Cited by 18
Robles-Zazueta, C. A., Pinto, F., Molero, G., Foulkes, M. J., Reynolds, M., & Murchie, E. (2022) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.828451 · Cited by 18
Tamagno, S., Sadras, V., Aznar-Moreno, J., Durrett, T., & Ciampitti, I. (2022) · Field crops research (Print) · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2022.108446 · Cited by 18
Prakash, P., Banan, D., Paul, R. E., Feldman, M. J., Xie, D., Freyfogle, L., Baxter, I. R., & Leakey, A. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erab166 · Cited by 18
“This is consistent with RILs that had higher temperatures due to less evaporative cooling being able to assimilate less CO2, and therefore producing less biomass, which was expected based on theory and previous studies (Fischer et al., 1998; Jones, 2004).”
Sanz‐Saez, A., Maw, M. J., Polanía, J., Rao, I. M., Beebe, S., & Fritschi, F. (2019) · Crop science · doi:10.2135/cropsci2019.02.0085 · Cited by 18
Haghighi, M., & da Silva, J. A. T. (2016) · doi:10.1080/00103624.2015.1109650 · Cited by 18
“The deleterious effects of Cd on photosynthetic rate, such as chl biosynthesis (Baszyński et al. 1980; Fischer et al. 1998), functioning of photochemical reactions (Li and Miles 1975; Skórzyńska-Polit and Baszyński 1995), and the activities of enzymes of the Calvin cycle have been proved (Chugh and Sawhney 1999; Wang…”
BackgroundPhenotyping of Plants for Drought and Salt Tolerance Using Infra-Red Thermography
Kwon, T., Kim, K.-H., Yoon, H., Lee, S.-K., Kim, B.-K., & Siddiqui, Z. S. (2015) · doi:10.9787/pbb.2015.3.4.299 · Cited by 18
“There were successful cases applying IR thermography to screen High-througput Phenotyping of Crop Plants for Drought and Salt Tolerances ∙ 303 drought tolerant genotypes in wheat breeding (Fischer et al. 1998; Reynolds et al. 1998; Brennan et al. 2007).”
MethodShu, X., Zhang, Q.-F., & Wang, W.-B. (2014) · Environmental science and pollution research international · doi:10.1007/s11356-014-3246-4 · Cited by 18
“A strong relationship between stomatal conductance (Cond), internal CO2 concentration (Ci), and yield has been reported under temperate conditions (Fischer et al. 1998).”
BackgroundStomatal lock‐up following pathogenic challenge: source or symptom of costs of resistance in crops?
Mur, L., Simpson, C., Gay, A., Smith, J., Paveley, N., Sánchez-Martín, J., & Prats, E. (2013) · doi:10.1111/ppa.12174 · Cited by 18
Panio, G., Motzo, R., Mastrangelo, A. M., Marone, D., Cattivelli, L., Giunta, F., & Vita, P. D. (2013) · Annals of Applied Biology · doi:10.1111/aab.12018 · Cited by 18
Daw, M. (2012) · Journal of Agricultural Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0021859612000627 · Cited by 18
Genetic and Molecular Aspects of Plant Response to Drought in Annual Crop Species
Leonardis, A. M. D., Petrarulo, M., De, P., & Anna, M. (2012) · InTech eBooks · doi:10.5772/31352 · Cited by 16
“Maximal rates of photosynthesis were also positively correlated with increased yields of advanced varieties, while leaf temperatures were negatively correlated (Fischer et al., 1998).”
BackgroundKhanthavong, P., Yabuta, S., Malik, A. I., Hossain, M., Akagi, I., & Sakagami, J. (2022) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants11081039 · Cited by 17
“The positive correlation between gs and photosynthesis (A) has been reported in the laboratory [11] and a positive correlation between gs and yield has also been reported in field conditions [12].”
BackgroundCanopy Temperature Depression as an Effective Physiological Trait for Drought Screening
Sofi, P. A., Ara, A., Gull, M., & Rehman, K. (2019) · Drought - Detection and Solutions · doi:10.5772/intechopen.85966 · Cited by 17
“Canopy temperature has been used successfully as selection criteria in breeding for drought-prone environments [33, 37, 40].”
BackgroundMethodZhang, Y.-Q., Wang, Z., Fan, Z.-R., Li, J.-F., Gao, X., Zhang, H.-Z., Zhao, Q., Wang, Z.-Y., & Liu, Z. (2019) · Breeding Science · doi:10.1270/jsbbs.18104 · Cited by 17
Physiological Efficiency of Sugarcane Clones under Water-Limited Conditions
Arunkumar, R., Vasantha, S., Tayade, A. S., Anusha, S., Geetha, P., & Hemaprabha, G. (2020) · doi:10.13031/trans.13550 · Cited by 17
Wheat yield improvement is associated with altered root systems during cultivar replacement
Wei, X., Guo, S., Ma, B., Palta, J. A., Ma, Y., & Li, P. (2024) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/j.eja.2024.127101 · Cited by 16
Canopy light distribution effects on light use efficiency in wheat and its mechanism
Zhang, J., Zhang, Z., Neng, F., Xiong, S., Wei, Y.-H., Cao, R.-H., Wei, Q.-R., Ma, X.-M., & Wang, X.-C. (2022) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2022.1023117 · Cited by 16
“The crop yield was generally positively correlated to the photosynthesis in the flag leaves in high light conditions (Fischer et al., 1998; Reynolds et al., 2000).”
BackgroundFilaček, A., Živčák, M., Ferroni, L., Barboričová, M., Gašparovič, K., Yang, X.-H., Landi, M., & Brestič, M. (2022) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants11050616 · Cited by 16
“As the opening of stomata in high-temperature conditions may lead to more efficient cooling [40,41], our results suggest that the pre-acclimation of plants to high temperature improves, to some extent, the capacity of leaf thermoregulation.”
BackgroundInostroza, L., & Acuña, H. (2010) · doi:10.1111/j.1439-0523.2009.01742.x · Cited by 16
Zhu, L., Liang, Z.-S., Xu, X., Li, S., Jing, J., & Monneveux, P. (2008) · doi:10.1071/ar07476 · Cited by 16
Improving water transport for carbon gain in crops
Brodribb, T., Holloway-Phillips, M., & Bramley, H. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-417104-6.00011-x · Cited by 16
Improving photosynthesis and yield potential
Amthor, J. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-5486-0_2 · Cited by 16
“Yield gains in some crops apparently have been related in part to increased stomatal conductance, which allows greater evaporative cooling and CO2 uptake (e.g., Radin et al. 1994; Fischer et al. 1998; Morrison et al. 1999).”
BackgroundMatthews, M. L., & Burgess, S. (2024) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2024.103144 · Cited by 16
Phetluan, W., Wanchana, S., Aesomnuk, W., Adams, J. P., Pitaloka, M. K., Ruanjaichon, V., Vanavichit, A., Toojinda, T., Gray, J., & Arikit, S. (2023) · Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2023.111624 · Cited by 15
Genetic analysis of photosynthesis‐related traits in faba bean ( Vicia faba ) for crop improvement
Khazaei, H., Wach, D., Pecio, A., Vandenberg, A., & Stoddard, F. (2019) · Plant Breeding · doi:10.1111/pbr.12716 · Cited by 15
Zhu, X.-F., Zhang, H.-P., Hu, M.-J., Wu, Z.-Y., Jiang, H., Cao, J., Xia, X., Ma, C.-X., & Chang, C. (2016) · Molecular breeding · doi:10.1007/s11032-016-0563-y · Cited by 15
Influence of stomatal characteristics on yield and yield attributes of rice
Sarwar, A. K. M., Karim, M., & Rana, S. (2014) · doi:10.3329/jbau.v11i1.18207 · Cited by 15
“Strong indications have been obtained for a major influence of gs on crop growth rate during reproductive period in some crop species (Fischer et al., 1998; Horie et al., 2006).”
BackgroundBarrios-Masias, F., Chetelat, R., Grulke, N., & Jackson, L. (2014) · Functional Plant Biology · doi:10.1071/fp13097 · Cited by 15
“In addition, the reliability of abundant irrigation water supports the increase observed in gs, which is usually associated with gains in Pn and a decrease in WUEi (Fischer et al. 1998; Lu et al. 1998).”
BackgroundInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Fischer, R. A., Rees, D., Sayre, K. D., Lu, Z. ‐., Condon, A. G., & Saavedra, A. L.
- Affiliations
- Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (AU)
- Natural Resources Institute (GB)
- Centro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maíz Y Trigo (MX)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
- Cologeio de Postgraduados, Centro de Botanica Montecillo Texcoco Edo de Mexico Mexico
- Corresponding author
- Fischer, R. A.
- Venue
- Crop Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-11
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1467-1475
- ISSN
- 0011-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0653
- OpenAlex
- W2058467808
- Cited by
- 887
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 39
- FWCI
- 33.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Crop Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetics and Plant Breeding
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
- Keywords
- stomatal conductance, photosynthetic rate, canopy temperature depression, carbon isotope discrimination, leaf traits, intercellular CO2 concentration, northwestern Mexico
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review