Cited by 32Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareTechnology and Human Factors in Education and Health

Digital Technologies Impact on Healthcare Delivery: A Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine-Learning (ML) Adoption, Challenges, and Opportunities

Open access
Okwor, Ifeanyi Anthony, Hitch, Geeta, Hakkim, Saira, Akbar, Shabana, Sookhoo, Dave, Kainesie, John·2024·AI

Abstract

Recent significant advances in the healthcare industry due to artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have been shown to revolutionize healthcare delivery by improving efficiency, accuracy, and patient outcomes. However, these technologies can face significant challenges and ethical considerations. This systematic review aimed to gather and synthesize the current knowledge on the impact of AI and ML adoption in healthcare delivery, with its associated challenges and opportunities. This study adhered to the PRISMA guidelines. Articles from 2014 to 2024 were selected from various databases using specific keywords. Eligible studies were included after rigorous screening and quality assessment using checklist tools. Themes were identified through data analysis and thematic analysis. From 4981 articles screened, a data synthesis of nine eligible studies revealed themes, including productivity enhancement, improved patient care through decision support and precision medicine, legal and policy challenges, technological considerations, organizational and managerial aspects, ethical concerns, data challenges, and socioeconomic implications. There exist significant opportunities, as well as substantial challenges and ethical concerns, associated with integrating AI and ML into healthcare delivery. Implementation strategies must be carefully designed, considering technical, ethical, and social factors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ai5040095

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The adoption of AI in nursing raises critical ethical, social, and educational concerns.

    “Despite these promising developments, the adoption of AI in nursing raises critical ethical, social, and educational concerns.”
  • Social barriers including resistance to change among health care professionals and unequal access to AI technologies risk widening existing gaps in health care delivery and outcomes.

    “Social barriers, including resistance to change among health care professionals and unequal access to AI technologies, risk widening existing gaps in health care delivery and outcomes [9,10].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Okwor, I. A., Hitch, G., Hakkim, S., Akbar, S., Sookhoo, D., & Kainesie, J.
Affiliations
University of Sunderland (GB)
Corresponding author
Hitch, Geeta
Venue
AI
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2024-10-12
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
1918-1941
ISSN
2673-2688 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4403483525
Cited by
32
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 20
FWCI
0.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • AI (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Sunderland Repository (University of Sunderland) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Technology and Human Factors in Education and Health
Keywords
artificial intelligence in healthcare, machine learning adoption, health care delivery, clinical decision support, precision medicine, AI ethics, data challenges, implementation strategies, socio-economic impacts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review