Cited by 11Schizophrenia research and treatmentPsychometric Methodologies and TestingMental Health and Psychiatry

A Chinese version of the Psychotic Symptom Rating Scales: psychometric properties in recent-onset and chronic psychosis

Open access
Chien, Wai Tong, Lee, Isabella Yuet-Ming, Wang, Li-Qun·2017·Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to test the reliability, validity, and factor structure of a Chinese version of the Psychotic Symptom Rating Scale (PSYRATS) in 198 and 202 adult patients with recent-onset and chronic psychosis, respectively. The PSYRATS has been translated into different language versions and has been validated for clinical and research use mainly in chronic psychotic patients but not in recent-onset psychosis patients or in Chinese populations. The psychometric analysis of the translated Chinese version included assessment of its content validity, semantic equivalence, interrater and test-retest reliability, reproducibility, sensitivity to changes in psychotic symptoms, internal consistency, concurrent validity (compared to a valid psychotic symptom scale), and factor structure. The Chinese version demonstrated very satisfactory content validity as rated by an expert panel, good semantic equivalence with the original version, and high interrater and test-retest (at 2-week interval) reliability. It also indicated very good reproducibility of and sensitivity to changes in psychotic symptoms in line with the symptom severity measured with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). The scale consisted of four factors for the hallucination subscale and two factors for the delusion subscale, explaining about 80% of the total variance of the construct, indicating satisfactory correlations between the hallucination and delusion factors themselves, between items, factors, subscales, and overall scale, and between factors and relevant item and subscale scores of the PANSS. The Chinese version of the PSYRATS is a reliable and valid instrument to measure symptom severity in Chinese psychotic patients complementary to other existing measures mainly in English language.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2147/ndt.s131174

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The C-PSYRATS showed good internal consistency, satisfactory concurrent, construct and content validity, and satisfactory test-retest reliability in Chinese people with psychosis.

    “The C-PSYRATS showed good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.86 and 0.90 for the AHS and DS, respectively, and 0.89 for the overall scale). It also demonstrated satisfactory concurrent (Pearson’s r = 0.48 to 0.75, p = 0.003), construct (GFI = 0.097, Tucker–Lewis index [TLI] = 1.04, p = 0.02) and content validity, as well as satisfactory test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation”

    From Dispositional Mindfulness and Psychotic Symptoms in Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders: The Mediating Roles of Rumination and Negative Emotion (2022) · cites this paper as [60]

    The Results (Internal consistency and Test–retest reliability) and Discussion support the overall claim of good reliability and validity in Chinese patients with recent-onset and chronic psychosis. However, the citing sentence mislabels the reported r=0.48–0.75 as concurrent validity; the Results (Construct validity) use it for factor–item correlations. That section reports AGFI=0.97, not GFI=0.097, and gives P=0.54 for the six-factor model, not P=0.02. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [28]Brislin RW The wording and translation of research instruments Lonner WJ Berry JW Field Methods in Cross-cultural Research Thousand Oaks, CA Sage Publications, Inc 1986 137 164

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chien, W. T., Lee, I. Y.-M., & Wang, L.-Q.
Affiliations
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
  • Ruttonjee Hospital (CN)
  • Jilin Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
Chien, Wai Tong
Venue
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
Published
2017-03
Volume
Volume 13
Pages
745-753
ISSN
  • 1176-6328 (ISSN-L)
  • 1178-2021
OpenAlex
W2593364244
Cited by
11
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PolyU Institutional Research Archive (Hong Kong Polytechnic University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University
  • Hong Kong Government
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
Chinese translation, psychosis, recent-onset psychosis, chronic psychosis, hallucinations, delusions, symptom severity assessment, psychometric properties, factor structure, inter-rater reliability, test-retest reliability, PANSS

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review