Cited by 258Mental Health and Patient InvolvementHallucinations in medical conditionsSchizophrenia research and treatment

Emerging perspectives from the hearing voices movement: implications for research and practice

Open access
Corstens, Dirk, Longden, Eleanor, McCarthy-Jones, Simon, Waddingham, Rachel, Thomas, Neil·2014·Schizophrenia Bulletin

Abstract

The international Hearing Voices Movement (HVM) is a prominent mental health service-user/survivor movement that promotes the needs and perspectives of experts by experience in the phenomenon of hearing voices (auditory verbal hallucinations). The main tenet of the HVM is the notion that hearing voices is a meaningful human experience, and in this article, we discuss the historical growth and influence of the HVM before considering the implications of its values for research and practice in relation to voice-hearing. Among other recommendations, we suggest that the involvement of voice-hearers in research and a greater use of narrative and qualitative approaches are essential. Challenges for implementing user-led research are identified, and avenues for future developments are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/schbul/sbu007

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 75 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Corstens, D., Longden, E., McCarthy-Jones, S., Waddingham, R., & Thomas, N.
Affiliations
  • University of Leeds (GB)
  • Mind (GB)
  • Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research centre (AU)
Corresponding author
Corstens, Dirk
Venue
Schizophrenia Bulletin
Published
2014-06-13
Volume
40
Issue
Suppl_4
Pages
S285-S294
ISSN
  • 0586-7614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-1701
OpenAlex
W2126483083
Cited by
256
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7
FWCI
33.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Schizophrenia Bulletin (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (cc-by)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (098455, WT098455)
  • Macquarie University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
auditory verbal hallucinations
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Hallucinations, Humans, Patient Advocacy, Patient Participation, Peer Group, Research, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Self-Help Groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review