Cited by 29Cancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersCutaneous Melanoma Detection and ManagementImmunotherapy and Immune Responses

The impact of immunosenescence on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in melanoma patients: a meta-analysis

Open access
Li, Ping, Yang, Xuefang, Feng, Yumiao, Wu, Lijuan, Ma, Wei, Ding, Gaozhong, Wei, Yun, Sun, Lan·2018·OncoTargets and Therapy

Abstract

Background: Immunosenescence, the age-related decline of immunity, affects the immune responses of melanoma patients. Through immune responses, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) exert their antitumor robustness. In different ages of melanoma patients, especially the older patients, the effectiveness of ICIs remains unclear. It is still controversial whether ICIs should be used in treating older patients. Materials and methods: The authors included clinical trials of ICIs in older and younger patients. The authors used hazard ratio (HR) and 95% CI of overall survival (OS). Results: From four phase III randomized clinical trials 2,251 melanoma patients were included. We found that ICIs significantly prolonged the OS for melanoma patients in both younger (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.60–0.82; P <0.001) and older groups (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.41–0.83; P <0.001) compared with controls. Anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) agents appeared to be more efficient in older melanoma patients (HR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.14–0.53) versus younger patients (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.26–0.78). Conclusion: ICIs significantly prolonged the OS for melanoma patients in both younger and older groups than controls. Anti-PD-1 agents were more efficient in older melanoma patients versus younger patients. ICIs could be used for older melanoma patients. Keywords: immunosenescence, aging, immune checkpoint inhibitor, PD-1, melanoma

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2147/ott.s165368

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Anti-PD-1 drugs are effective for both young and elderly patients.

    “A meta-analysis of randomized trials showed that although anti-PD-1 drugs are effective for both young and elderly patients, the risk of death among elderly patients is comparable or improved compared to that of patients subjected to control interventions, with no increased toxicity [155–158].”

    From Immunosenescence: a key player in cancer development (2020) · cites this paper as [156]

  • Anti-PD-1 drugs cause no increased toxicity in elderly patients.

    “with no increased toxicity [155–158].”

    From Immunosenescence: a key player in cancer development (2020) · cites this paper as [156]

  • The risk of death among elderly patients receiving anti-PD-1 drugs is comparable or improved compared to control interventions.

    “the risk of death among elderly patients is comparable or improved compared to that of patients subjected to control interventions, with no increased toxicity [155–158].”

    From Immunosenescence: a key player in cancer development (2020) · cites this paper as [156]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, P., Yang, X., Feng, Y., Wu, L., Ma, W., Ding, G., Wei, Y., & Sun, L.
Affiliations
  • Nanjing Medical University (CN)
  • Suzhou Municipal Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
Sun, Lan
Venue
OncoTargets and Therapy
Published
2018-10
Volume
Volume 11
Pages
7521-7527
ISSN
1178-6930 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2898256009
Cited by
29
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • OncoTargets and Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
Keywords
immunosenescence, immune checkpoint inhibitors, melanoma, elderly patients, anti-PD-1 therapy, overall survival, age-related immune decline, immunotherapy efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review