Cited by 36Sports Performance and TrainingMuscle metabolism and nutritionExercise and Physiological Responses

The Effect of High Carbohydrate Meals with Different Glycemic Indices on Recovery of Performance during Prolonged Intermittent High-Intensity Shuttle Running

Erith, Samuel, Williams, Clyde, Stevenson, Emma, Chamberlain, Siobhan, Crews, Pippa, Rushbury, Ian·2006·International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism

Abstract

This study examined the effect of high carbohydrate meals with different glycemic indices (GI) on recovery of performance during prolonged intermittent high-intensity shuttle running. Seven male semi-professional soccer players (age 23 ± 2 y, body mass [BM] 73.7 ± 9.0 kg and maximal oxygen uptake 58 ± 1.0 mL · kg−1 · min−1) participated in two trials in a randomized cross-over design. On day 1, the subjects performed 90 min of an intermittent high-intensity shuttle running protocol [Loughborough Intermittent Shuttle Test (LIST)]. They then consumed a mixed high carbohydrate recovery diet (8 g/kg BM) consisting of either high (HGI) (GI: 70) or low (LGI) (GI: 35) GI foods. Twenty-two hours later (day 2) the subjects completed 75 min of the LIST (part A) followed by alternate sprinting and jogging to fatigue (part B). No differences were found between trials in time to fatigue (HGI 25.3 ± 4.0 min vs. LGI 22.9 ± 5.6 min, P = 0.649). Similarly, no differences were found between trials for sprint performance and distance covered during part B of the LIST. In conclusion, the GI of the diet during the 22 h recovery did not affect sprint and endurance performance the following day.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1123/ijsnem.16.4.393

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Erith, S., Williams, C., Stevenson, E., Chamberlain, S., Crews, P., & Rushbury, I.
Affiliations
Northumbria University (GB)
Venue
International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism
Published
2006-08
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
393-404
ISSN
  • 1526-484X (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-2742
OpenAlex
W2165061353
Cited by
36
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Loughborough University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Exercise and Physiological Responses
Keywords
glycemic index, high-carbohydrate meal, post-exercise recovery, Loughborough Intermittent Shuttle Test, soccer players, time to exhaustion, sprint performance, endurance performance
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Glucose, Dietary Carbohydrates, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Physical Exertion, Fatigue, Fatty Acids, Nonesterified, Glycerol, Humans, Insulin, Male, Oxygen Consumption, Physical Endurance, Soccer, Task Performance and Analysis, Exercise, Cross-Over Studies, Area Under Curve, Glycemic Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review