Cited by 114Sesquiterpenes and Asteraceae StudiesAnalytical Methods in PharmaceuticalsPhytochemical compounds biological activities

New Trends in Extraction, Identification and Quantification of Artemisinin and its Derivatives

Christen, P., Veuthey, J.·2001·Current Medicinal Chemistry

Abstract

Artemisinin, a sesquiterpene lactone endoperoxide, and a number of its precursors, metabolites and semisynthetic derivatives have shown to possess antimalarial properties. Several methods have been reported for the measurement of artemisinin and its main derivatives in plant material and biological fluids. However, most of them are either not sufficiently sensitive and do not offer reliable results, or are difficult to apply in routine analyses. Therefore, new m ethods for the determination of these compounds, such as supercritical fluid extraction and chromatography, pressurized solvent extraction, microwave-assisted extraction, high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry or evaporative light scattering detection, will be presented. Applications to plant material, pharmaceutical formulations and biological fluids will also be reviewed. Keywords: Artemisinin, Artemisia annua, A. annua, artemisitene, artemisinic acid, arteannuin B, Pressurized solvent extraction (PSE), Microwave-assisted Extraction, Thermolysis, dihydroartemisinin, TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY, HPLC-UV, HPLC-MS, ENZYME-LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY, CAPILLARY ELECTROPHORESIS, EVAPORATIVE LIGHT SCATTERING DETECTOR

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2174/0929867013371563

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many investigators use the HPLC Q260 method of analysis, but it can result in false positives regarding artemisinin mainly because it cannot distinguish between artemisinin and deoxyartemisinin.

    “Many investigators use the HPLC Q260 method of analysis, but it can result in false positives regarding artemisinin mainly because it cannot distinguish between artemisinin and deoxyartemisinin (Lapkin et al. 2009; Christen and Veuthey 2001; Smith et al. 2010).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Christen, P., & Veuthey, J.
Affiliations
University of Geneva (CH)
Corresponding author
Veuthey, J.
Venue
Current Medicinal Chemistry
Published
2001-12-01
Volume
8
Issue
15
Pages
1827-1839
ISSN
0929-8673 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2004079629
Cited by
114
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 7
FWCI
0.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Medicinal Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Sesquiterpenes and Asteraceae Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Phytochemical compounds biological activities
Keywords
artemisinin, artemisinin derivatives, antimalarial drugs, Artemisia annua, artemisinic acid, arteannuin B, dihydroartemisinin, supercritical fluid extraction, accelerated solvent extraction, microwave-assisted extraction, HPLC-MS, tandem mass spectrometry, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, capillary electrophoresis, evaporative light scattering detection, extraction methods, biological fluids, drug formulation
MeSH terms
Antimalarials, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Desiccation, Electrochemistry, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Light, Scattering, Radiation, Sesquiterpenes, Solvents, Mass Spectrometry, Electrophoresis, Capillary, Artemisia, Artemisinins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review