Cited by 267Extracellular vesicles in diseaseBarrier Structure and Function StudiesNanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery

The Transport Mechanism of Extracellular Vesicles at the Blood-Brain Barrier

Matsumoto, Junichi, Stewart, Tessandra, Banks, William A., Zhang, Jing·2018·Current Pharmaceutical Design

Abstract

Recently, extracellular vesicles (EVs), like exosomes and microvesicles, have attracted attention as potent carriers of intercellular communication throughout the body, including the brain. They transmit biological signals from donor cells to recipient cells, and recent evidence suggests that they may even carry such signals to distant destinations through peripheral circulation. In the central nervous system (CNS), EVs contribute to maintaining normal neuronal function, as well as to the pathological development of neurodegenerative diseases. Although some evidence has suggested that EVs can cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB), moving from the peripheral circulation to the CNS, the mechanisms by which EVs facilitate communication between peripheral tissues and the CNS are not well understood. The BBB is a dynamic interface that regulates molecular trafficking between the peripheral circulation and the CNS. However, there is limited mechanistic understanding of how bloodborne EVs cross the BBB under physiological and pathological conditions. In this review, we focus on current knowledge of trafficking of EVs between the peripheral circulation and the brain. Moreover, we describe hypothetical transport routes by which EVs may cross the BBB based on previous reports. Further investigation is needed to understand the precise mechanisms by which EVs are transported across the BBB.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2174/1381612823666170913164738

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Matsumoto, J., Stewart, T., Banks, W. A., & Zhang, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • VA Puget Sound Health Care System (US)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Jing
Venue
Current Pharmaceutical Design
Published
2018-02-15
Volume
23
Issue
40
Pages
6206-6214
ISSN
1381-6128 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2754129305
Cited by
267
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 13
FWCI
10.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Pharmaceutical Design (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (U01NS082137, U01NS091272)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R01ES019277, P30ES007033)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Extracellular vesicles in disease
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
Keywords
extracellular vesicles, blood-brain barrier, exosomes, microvesicles, intercellular communication, neurodegenerative diseases, blood-brain barrier permeability, central nervous system
MeSH terms
Extracellular Vesicles, Animals, Biological Transport, Blood-Brain Barrier, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review