Cited by 57Mental Health via WritingPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology

Written Emotional Expression and Religion: Effects on PTSD Symptoms

Chen, Yung Y.·2005·The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine

Abstract

Objective: Previous research has found an association between writing about traumatic events and well-being. This study examined the effects of taking a religious perspective during a trauma-writing exercise. Method: Participants included 177 college students who were assigned randomly to either a conventional trauma writing or a religious trauma writing condition. Participants in the conventional writing condition were instructed to write about a traumatic experience, while participants in the religious writing condition were instructed to write about the trauma from a religious/spiritual perspective. Well-being was assessed by symptoms of PTSD at one-month follow-up. Results: Writing condition was found to interact with trauma severity and gender to affect PTSD symptoms at follow-up. Conventional writing was more effective (in reducing PTSD symptoms) for participants reporting lower trauma severity than for those who reported higher trauma severity. Effects of religious writing on PTSD symptoms were not influenced by trauma severity. Also, women benefited more from religious writing than men did with regard to reductions in PTSD symptoms. Conclusion: It appears possible to adapt the conventional written emotional expression procedure in a way that encourages individuals to take a religious perspective, thereby augmenting effects on distress. These findings support further investigation of integrating religion into trauma interventions, particularly for individuals exposed to highly traumatic events.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2190/2x0u-0ctb-y877-5drq

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Of the 67 studies with quality ratings of seven or higher on R/S and anxiety, 38 (55%) reported inverse relationships and seven (10%) found positive relationships.

    “Of the 67 studies with quality ratings of seven or higher, 38 (55%) reported inverse relationships [173–182] and seven (10%) found positive relationships (greater anxiety among the more R/S) [183–189].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, Y. Y.
Affiliations
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
Chen, Yung Y.
Venue
The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine
Published
2005-09
Volume
35
Issue
3
Pages
273-286
ISSN
  • 0033-278X (ISSN-L)
  • 0091-2174
  • 1541-3527
OpenAlex
W2108235765
Cited by
56
References
30
Citations by year
2023: 44 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Keywords
trauma writing, religious perspectives, posttraumatic stress symptoms, injury severity, gender differences, university students, expressive writing
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Religion and Psychology, Sex Factors, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Verbal Behavior, Writing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review