The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Role of Self-Regulated Learning in Fostering Students' Conceptual Understanding of Complex Systems with Hypermedia
Abstract
This study examines the role of self-regulated learning (SRL) in facilitating students' shifts to more sophisticated mental models of the circulatory system as indicated by both performance and process data. We began with Winne and colleagues' information processing model of SRL (Winne, 2001; Winne & Hadwin, 1998) and used it to examine how students regulated their own learning when using a hypermedia environment to learn about the circulatory system. Undergraduate students ( N = 24) were trained to use a hypermedia environment to learn about the circulatory system. Pretest, posttest, and verbal protocol data were collected to measure the shifts in conceptual understanding (from pretest to posttest) and the SRL variables associated with shifts in conceptual understanding. We used a median split to divide the sample into two groups of learners—high-jumpers and low-jumpers (i.e., students who either showed large gains in conceptual understanding or showed relatively little or no gain in their conceptual understanding). Findings revealed that the high-jumpers shifted an average of 4.5 mental models, while the low-jumpers had an average shift of less than one mental model from pretest to posttest. The verbal protocol data were coded for various self-regulating variables to examine which SRL variables differentiated the low-jumpers from the high-jumpers. High-jumpers were much better at regulating their learning during the knowledge construction activity. In general, they used effective strategies, planned their learning by creating sub-goals and activating prior knowledge, monitored their emerging understanding, and planned their time and effort. In contrast, low-jumpers used equal amounts of effective and ineffective strategies, planned their learning by using sub-goals and recycling goals in working memory, handled task difficulties and demands by engaging mainly in help-seeking behavior, and did not spend much time monitoring their learning. Our results provide a valuable initial characterization of the role of SRL in accounting for differences in conceptual knowledge gains when students use hypermedia environments to learn about complex science topics. In addition, we discuss the general instructional implications of our findings and how they can be used to inform the design of hypermedia environments to teach students about complex systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mayer, R. E. (2009) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511811678 · Cited by 7,800
Mayer, R. (2020) · doi:10.1017/9781316941355 · Cited by 7,777
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000) · Handbook of Self-Regulation · doi:10.1016/b978-012109890-2/50031-7 · Cited by 6,069
Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data
Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/5657.001.0001 · Cited by 3,537
Mayer, R. E. (2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139164603 · Cited by 2,304
Studying as Self-Regulated Learning
(1998) · Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice · doi:10.4324/9781410602350-19 · Cited by 1,589
Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: making science accessible to all students
White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. R. (1998) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1601_2 · Cited by 1,394 · cited 2×
“This result challenges existing systems designed to foster students’ conceptual understanding (e.g., White & Frederiksen, 1998) since it would necessitate “expanding” system components (e.g., student model, instructional model, interface, etc.) to determine the learner student’s emerging mental…”
BackgroundMethodMeasuring Self-Regulated Learning
Winne, P. H., & Perry, N. E. (2000) · Handbook of Self-Regulation · doi:10.1016/b978-012109890-2/50045-7 · Cited by 1,383
Chi, M. T. H., Siler, S. A., Jeong, H., Yamauchi, T., & Hausmann, R. G. (2001) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2504_1 · Cited by 855
Mayer, R. E., & Chandler, P. (2001) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.93.2.390 · Cited by 762
Cited by
Does Training on Self-Regulated Learning Facilitate Students' Learning With Hypermedia?
Azevedo, R., & Cromley, J. G. (2004) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.523 · Cited by 859
Self-citationAzevedo, R., Moos, D. C., Greene, J. A., Winters, F. I., & Cromley, J. G. (2008) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-007-9067-0 · Cited by 380
Self-citationAdaptive Human Scaffolding Facilitates Adolescents’ Self-regulated Learning with Hypermedia
Azevedo, R., Cromley, J. G., Winters, F. I., Moos, D. C., & Greene, J. A. (2005) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-005-1273-8 · Cited by 306
Self-citationRoth, A., Ogrin, S., & Schmitz, B. (2016) · Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability · doi:10.1007/s11092-015-9229-2 · Cited by 294
On the Benefits of Seeking (and Avoiding) Help in Online Problem-Solving Environments
Roll, I., Baker, R. S. J. D., Aleven, V., & Koedinger, K. R. (2014) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1080/10508406.2014.883977 · Cited by 109
Gurlitt, J., & Renkl, A. (2010) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-008-9090-5 · Cited by 103
Greene, J. A., Hutchison, L. A., Costa, L.-J., & Crompton, H. (2012) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2012.02.002 · Cited by 74
Gurlitt, J., & Renkl, A. (2008) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2008.00277.x · Cited by 54
Greene, J. A., Dellinger, K. R., Tüysüzoğlu, B. B., & Costa, L.-J. (2013) · Springer International Handbooks of Education · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-5546-3_8 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Azevedo, R., Guthrie, J. T., & Seibert, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Educational Computing Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2004-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 87-111
- ISSN
- 0735-6331 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-4140
- OpenAlex
- W2158052177
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 18.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.