Cited by 39Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsInnovative Human-Technology InteractionHealth Literacy and Information Accessibility

“It’s Not Just Technology, It’s People”: Constructing a Conceptual Model of Shared Health Informatics for Tracking in Chronic Illness Management

Open access
Vizer, Lisa M, Eschler, Jordan, Koo, Bon Mi, Ralston, James, Pratt, Wanda, Munson, Sean·2019·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For many people, tracking health indicators is central to managing a chronic illness. However, previous informatics research has largely viewed tracking as a solitary process that lacks the characteristics essential to tracking in support of chronic illness management. OBJECTIVE: To inform development of effective technologies that aid tracking of health indicators to support chronic illness management, this study aimed to construct a health informatics model that accurately describes the work and social context of that tracking work. METHODS: As part of a larger project, we conducted semistructured interviews with 40 adults concerning their chronic illness management practices, including tracking and communication. We also assembled transcripts of 30 publicly available videos of 24 adults discussing tracking processes for managing their own chronic illness. We used qualitative methods to analyze interviews and video transcripts through the lens of ongoing personal and health informatics research. RESULTS: We have described the people and work involved in tracking in support of chronic illness management and contributed a Conceptual Model of Shared Health Informatics (CoMSHI). Specifically, we identified the need for a health informatics model that (1) incorporates the ongoing nature of tracking work and (2) represents the social dimension of tracking for illness management. Our model depicts communication, information, collection, integration, reflection, and action work in the social context of the person with chronic illness, informal carers, health care providers, and community members. CONCLUSIONS: The resulting CoMSHI yields a more detailed and nuanced viewpoint of tracking in support of chronic illness management and can inform technology design to improve tracking tools to support people in more confident and capable chronic illness management.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/10830

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [24]MacLeod H Tang A Carpendale S Personal informatics in chronic illness management Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2013 2013 Graphics Interface 2013 May 29-31, 2013 Regina, SK, Canada Toronto, ON, Canada Canadian Information Processing Society
  2. [48]Holtzblatt K Beyer H Contextual Design: Design for Life. 2nd Edition 2017 12 14 Amsterdam Morgan Kaufmann

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vizer, L. M., Eschler, J., Koo, B. M., Ralston, J., Pratt, W., & Munson, S.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Vizer, Lisa M
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2019-04-29
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
e10830
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2916596198
Cited by
39
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 1
FWCI
7.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR002489)
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (R01HS021590)
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine (T15LM007442)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Keywords
chronic disease management, conceptual model, informal caregivers, provider communication, technology design
MeSH terms
Patient Reported Outcome Measures, Adult, Chronic Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Medical Informatics, Middle Aged, Internet, Information Seeking Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review