Cited by 225Machine Learning in HealthcareArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationReinforcement Learning in Robotics

Reinforcement learning for clinical decision support in critical care: comprehensive review

Open access
Liu, Siqi, See, Kay Choong, Ngiam, Kee Yuan, Celi, Leo Anthony, Sun, Xingzhi, Feng, Mengling·2020·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: Decision support systems based on reinforcement learning (RL) have been implemented to facilitate the delivery of personalized care. This paper aimed to provide a comprehensive review of RL applications in the critical care setting. Objective: This review aimed to survey the literature on RL applications for clinical decision support in critical care and to provide insight into the challenges of applying various RL models. Methods: We performed an extensive search of the following databases: PubMed, Google Scholar, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), ScienceDirect, Web of Science, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), and Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE). Studies published over the past 10 years (2010-2019) that have applied RL for critical care were included. Results: We included 21 papers and found that RL has been used to optimize the choice of medications, drug dosing, and timing of interventions and to target personalized laboratory values. We further compared and contrasted the design of the RL models and the evaluation metrics for each application. Conclusions: RL has great potential for enhancing decision making in critical care. Challenges regarding RL system design, evaluation metrics, and model choice exist. More importantly, further work is required to validate RL in authentic clinical environments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/18477

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reinforcement learning and deep reinforcement learning have recently been used in clinical settings, including optimal dosing and choice of medications, optimal timing of interventions, and optimal individual target laboratory values.

    “Recently, reinforcement learning and deep reinforcement learning have been used in several clinical settings, including optimal dosing and choice of medications, optimal timing of interventions, and optimal individual target laboratory values (34).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. [17]Howard RA Dynamic Programming and Markov Process 1960 New York, USA MIT Press and Wiley
  2. [18]Mnih V Kavukcuoglu K Silver D Graves A Antonoglou I Wierstra D Riedmiller M Playing atari with deep reinforcement learning arXiv preprint 2013 - epub ahead of print(1312.5602)
  3. [23]van Hasselt H Guez A Silver D Deep Reinforcement Learning With Double Q-learning Proceedings of the Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2016 AAAI'16 February 12-17, 2016 Phoenix, Arizona, USA 10.5555/3016100.3016191 · DOI
  4. [24]Mnih V Puigdomenech A Mirza M Graves A Lillicrap T Harley T Silver D Kavukcuoglu K Asynchronous methods for deep reinforcement learning Arxiv 2016 - epub ahead of print(1602.01783)
  5. [33]Ghassemi MM Alhanai T Westover MB Mark TG Nemati S Personalized Medication Dosing Using Volatile Data Streams Proceedings of the Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2018 AAAI'18 February 2-7, 2018 New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
  6. [35]Raghu A Komorowski M Ahmed I Celi L Szolovits P Ghassemi M Deep reinforcement learning for sepsis treatment arXiv 2017 - epub ahead of print(1711.09602)
  7. [36]Raghu A Komorowski M Celi L Szolovits P Ghassemi M Continuous state-space models for optimal sepsis treatment-a deep reinforcement learning approach arXiv 2017 - epub ahead of print(1705.08422)
  8. [37]Raghu A Komorowski M Singh S Model-based reinforcement learning for sepsis treatment arXiv 2018 - epub ahead of print-1811.09602
  9. [38]Futoma J Lin A Sendak M Bedoya A Clement M O'Brien C Heller K Learning to Treat Sepsis with Multi-Output Gaussian Process Deep Recurrent Q-Networks OpenReview 2018 2020-06-10 https://openreview.net/forum?id=SyxCqGbRZ
  10. [43]Prasad N Cheng LF Chivers C Draugelis M Engelhardt B A reinforcement learning approach to weaning of mechanical ventilation in intensive care units Arxiv 2017 - epub ahead of print(1704.06300)
  11. [46]Weng W Gao M He Z Yan S Szolovits P Representation and reinforcement learning for personalized glycemic control in septic patients arXiv 2017 - epub ahead of print(1712.00654)
  12. [56]Kashyap R Loftsgard TO Clinicians role in reducing lab order frequency in ICU settings J Perioper Crit Intens Care Nurs 2015 2 1 320 31 10.4172/jpcic.1000112 · DOI
  13. [66]Jeter R Josef C Shashikumar S Nemati S Does the artificial intelligence clinician learn optimal treatment strategies for sepsis in intensive care? arXiv 2019 - epub ahead of print(1902.03271)
  14. [67]Lillicrap T Hunt J Pritzel A Heess N Erez T Tassa Y Silver D Wierstra D Continuous control with deep reinforcement learning arXiv 2015 - epub ahead of print(1509.02971)
  15. [76]Maei H Szepesv´ari C Bhatnagar S Sutton R Toward Off-Policy Learning Control with Function Approximation The 27th International Conference on Machine Learning 2010 ICML'10 June 21-24, 2010 Haifa, Israel

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, S., See, K. C., Ngiam, K. Y., Celi, L. A., Sun, X., & Feng, M.
Affiliations
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • National University Hospital (SG)
  • National University Health System (SG)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • Ping An (China) (CN)
Corresponding author
Feng, Mengling
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2020-07-20
Volume
22
Issue
7
Pages
e18477
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3025019304
Cited by
225
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 4
FWCI
0.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • National University of Singapore (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Research Foundation (AISG-GC-2019-002)
  • National University of Singapore
  • National Research Foundation Singapore (AISG-GC-2019-002)
  • National University Health System (WBS R-608-000-199-733)
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Medical Research Council (HSRG-OC17nov004)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
Keywords
reinforcement learning, clinical decision support, intensive care, personalized medicine, drug dosing optimization, drug selection, intervention timing, evaluation metrics, clinical validation
MeSH terms
Critical Care, Humans, Reinforcement, Psychology, Decision Support Systems, Clinical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review