Cited by 141Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesDigital Mental Health InterventionsCannabis and Cannabinoid Research

Effectiveness of a self-guided web-based cannabis treatment program: randomized controlled trial

Open access
Rooke, Sally, Copeland, Jan, Norberg, Melissa, Hine, Donald, McCambridge, Jim·2013·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Self-help strategies offer a promising way to address problems with access to and stigma associated with face-to-face drug and alcohol treatment, and the Internet provides an excellent delivery mode for such strategies. To date, no study has tested the effectiveness of a fully self-guided web-based treatment for cannabis use and related problems. OBJECTIVES: The current study was a two-armed randomized controlled trial aimed at testing the effectiveness of Reduce Your Use, a fully self-guided web-based treatment program for cannabis use disorder consisting of 6 modules based on cognitive, motivational, and behavioral principles. METHODS: 225 individuals who wanted to cease or reduce their cannabis use were recruited using both online and offline advertising methods and were randomly assigned to receive: (1) the web-based intervention, or (2) a control condition consisting of 6 modules of web-based educational information on cannabis. Assessments of cannabis use, dependence symptoms, and abuse symptoms were conducted through online questionnaires at baseline, and at 6-week and 3-month follow-ups. Two sets of data analyses were undertaken--complier average causal effect (CACE) modeling and intention to treat (ITT). RESULTS: Two thirds (149) of the participants completed the 6-week postintervention assessment, while 122 (54%) completed the 3-month follow-up assessment. Participants in the intervention group completed an average of 3.5 of the 6 modules. The CACE analysis revealed that at 6 weeks, the experimental group reported significantly fewer days of cannabis use during the past month (P=.02), significantly lower past-month quantity of cannabis use (P=.01), and significantly fewer symptoms of cannabis abuse (P=.047) relative to controls. Cannabis dependence symptoms (number and severity) and past-month abstinence did not differ significantly between groups (Ps>.05). Findings at 3 months were similar, except that the experimental group reported significantly fewer and less severe cannabis dependence symptoms (Ps<.05), and past-month quantity of cannabis consumed no longer differed significantly between groups (P=.16). ITT analyses yielded similar outcomes. CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that web-based interventions may be an effective means of treating uncomplicated cannabis use and related problems and reducing the public health burden of cannabis use disorders. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12609000856213, Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/jmir.2256

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [30]Muthen LK Muthen BO Mplus user's guide. Sixth Edition 1998 Los Angeles, CA Muthen & Muthen
  2. [50]Riper H Kramer J Smit F Conijn B Schippers G Cuijpers P Web-based self-help for problem drinkers: a pragmatic randomized trial Addiction 2008 2 103 2 218 27 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.02063.x 18199300 18199300 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [51]Eysenbach G CONSORT-EHEALTH Group CONSORT-EHEALTH: improving and standardizing evaluation reports of Web-based and mobile health interventions J Med Internet Res 2011 13 4 e126 10.2196/jmir.1923 22209829 22209829 PMC3278112 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rooke, S., Copeland, J., Norberg, M., Hine, D., & McCambridge, J.
Affiliations
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • University of New England (US)
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
Corresponding author
Rooke, Sally
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2013-02-15
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
e26
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2060967263
Cited by
141
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6
FWCI
9.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • RUNE (Research UNE) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (WT086516MA)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
Keywords
cannabis use disorder, online intervention, self-guided treatment, cannabis use reduction, self-help
MeSH terms
Adult, Australia, Marijuana Abuse, Female, Humans, Male, Self Care, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Health Behavior, Treatment Outcome, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Telemedicine, Internet, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review