Cited by 59Cancer survivorship and careMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDigital Mental Health Interventions

Use and Appreciation of a Tailored Self-Management eHealth Intervention for Early Cancer Survivors: Process Evaluation of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Open access
Kanera, Iris Maria, Willems, Roy A, Bolman, Catherine A W, Mesters, Ilse, Zambon, Victor, Gijsen, Brigitte CM, Lechner, Lilian·2016·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A fully automated computer-tailored Web-based self-management intervention, Kanker Nazorg Wijzer (KNW [Cancer Aftercare Guide]), was developed to support early cancer survivors to adequately cope with psychosocial complaints and to promote a healthy lifestyle. The KNW self-management training modules target the following topics: return to work, fatigue, anxiety and depression, relationships, physical activity, diet, and smoking cessation. Participants were guided to relevant modules by personalized module referral advice that was based on participants’ current complaints and identified needs. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the adherence to the module referral advice, examine the KNW module use and its predictors, and describe the appreciation of the KNW and its predictors. Additionally, we explored predictors of personal relevance. METHODS: This process evaluation was conducted as part of a randomized controlled trial. Early cancer survivors with various types of cancer were recruited from 21 Dutch hospitals. Data from online self-report questionnaires and logging data were analyzed from participants allocated to the intervention condition. Chi-square tests were applied to assess the adherence to the module referral advice, negative binominal regression analysis was used to identify predictors of module use, multiple linear regression analysis was applied to identify predictors of the appreciation, and ordered logistic regression analysis was conducted to explore possible predictors of perceived personal relevance. RESULTS: From the respondents (N=231; mean age 55.6, SD 11.5; 79.2% female [183/231]), 98.3% (227/231) were referred to one or more KNW modules (mean 2.9, SD 1.5), and 85.7% (198/231) of participants visited at least one module (mean 2.1, SD 1.6). Significant positive associations were found between the referral to specific modules (range 1-7) and the use of corresponding modules. The likelihoods of visiting modules were higher when respondents were referred to those modules by the module referral advice. Predictors of visiting a higher number of modules were a higher number of referrals by the module referral advice (β=.136, P=.009), and having a partner was significantly related with a lower number of modules used (β=-.256, P=.044). Overall appreciation was high (mean 7.5, SD 1.2; scale 1-10) and was significantly predicted by a higher perceived personal relevance (β=.623, P=.000). None of the demographic and cancer-related characteristics significantly predicted the perceived personal relevance. CONCLUSIONS: The KNW in general and more specifically the KNW modules were well used and highly appreciated by early cancer survivors. Indications were found that the module referral advice might be a meaningful intervention component to guide the users in following a preferred selection of modules. These results indicate that the fully automated Web-based KNW provides personal relevant and valuable information and support for early cancer survivors. Therefore, this intervention can complement usual cancer aftercare and may serve as a first step in a stepped-care approach. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Nederlands Trial Register: NTR3375; http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=3375 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6jo4jO7kb).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/jmir.5975

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [49]Bleijenberg G Berends T Voskamp H Bazelmans E Verhagen S Gielissen MFM Cognitive behaviour therapy for post-cancer fatigue: a treatment protocol Fatigue in cancer survivors: from assessment to cognitive behaviour therapy (Doctoral dissertation) 2007 Nijmegen Radboud University

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kanera, I. M., Willems, R. A., Bolman, C. A. W., Mesters, I., Zambon, V., Gijsen, B. C., & Lechner, L.
Affiliations
  • Open University of the Netherlands (NL)
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • Zuyderland Medisch Centrum (NL)
  • Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (NL)
Corresponding author
Kanera, Iris Maria
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2016-08-23
Volume
18
Issue
8
Pages
e229
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2511621904
Cited by
59
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 13
FWCI
4.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • KWF Kankerbestrijding (NOU2011‐5151)
  • Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
self-management interventions, intervention adherence, intervention use, perceived personal relevance, psychosocial problems, return to work, fatigue, anxiety and depression, healthy lifestyle, smoking cessation, physical activity, diet, couple relationships, process evaluation
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Self Care, Telemedicine, Survivors, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review