Cited by 62Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDigital Mental Health InterventionsHealth Literacy and Information Accessibility

Who Follows eHealth Interventions as Recommended? A Study of Participants' Personal Characteristics From the Experimental Arm of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Open access
Reinwand, Dominique A, Schulz, Daniela N, Crutzen, Rik, Kremers, Stef PJ, de Vries, Hein·2015·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Computer-tailored eHealth interventions to improve health behavior have been demonstrated to be effective and cost-effective if they are used as recommended. However, different subgroups may use the Internet differently, which might also affect intervention use and effectiveness. To date, there is little research available depicting whether adherence to intervention recommendations differs according to personal characteristics. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to assess which personal characteristics are associated with using an eHealth intervention as recommended. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was conducted among a sample of the adult Dutch population (N=1638) testing an intervention aimed at improving 5 healthy lifestyle behaviors: increasing fruit and vegetable consumption, increasing physical activity, reducing alcohol intake, and promoting smoking cessation. Participants were asked to participate in those specific online modules for which they did not meet the national guideline(s) for the respective behavior(s). Participants who started with fewer than the recommended number of modules of the intervention were defined as users who did not follow the intervention recommendation. RESULTS: The fewer modules recommended to participants, the better participants adhered to the intervention modules. Following the intervention recommendation increased when participants were older (χ(2)1=39.8, P<.001), female (χ(2)1=15.8, P<.001), unemployed (χ(2)1=7.9, P=.003), ill (χ(2)1=4.5, P=.02), or in a relationship (χ(2)1=7.8, P=.003). No significant relevant differences were found between groups with different levels of education, incomes, or quality of life. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that eHealth interventions were used differently by subgroups. The more frequent as-recommended intervention use by unemployed, older, and ill participants may be an indication that these eHealth interventions are attractive to people with a greater need for health care information. Further research is necessary to make intervention use more attractive for people with unhealthy lifestyle patterns.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/jmir.3932

Cites

97 of 97 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [1]Noar SM Haarington NG Noar SM Harrington NG eHealth Applications: Promising Strategies for Behavior Change (Routledge Communication Series) 2010 3 10 London Routledge 336
  2. [14]Krebs P Prochaska JO Rossi JS A meta-analysis of computer-tailored interventions for health behavior change Prev Med 2010 51 3-4 214 21 10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.06.004 20558196 20558196 PMC2939185 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [23]Broekhuizen K Kroeze W van Poppel MNM Oenema A Brug J A systematic review of randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of computer-tailored physical activity and dietary behavior promotion programs: an update Ann Behav Med 2012 10 44 2 259 86 10.1007/s12160-012-9384-3 22767052 22767052 PMC3442159 · DOI
  4. [85]Ware J Kosinski M Keller SD A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity Med Care 1996 3 34 3 220 33 8628042 8628042

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reinwand, D. A., Schulz, D. N., Crutzen, R., Kremers, S. P., & de Vries, H.
Affiliations
  • Constructor University (DE)
  • Maastricht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Reinwand, Dominique A
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2015-05-11
Volume
17
Issue
5
Pages
e115
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1543120279
Cited by
62
References
97
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11
FWCI
13.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Keywords
digital health interventions, intervention adherence, computer-tailored intervention, healthy lifestyle behaviors, fruit and vegetable intake, physical activity, alcohol consumption, smoking cessation, personal characteristics, unemployed people, older adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Alcohol Drinking, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Female, Fruit, Humans, Life Style, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Patient Compliance, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Sex Factors, Unemployment, Vegetables, Cohort Studies, Health Behavior, Logistic Models, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Smoking Cessation, Telemedicine, Marital Status, Internet, Risk Reduction Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review