Cited by 34Social Media in Health EducationInnovations in Medical EducationImpact of Technology on Adolescents

Developing a curriculum to promote professionalism for medical students using social media: pilot of a workshop and blog-based intervention

Open access
Flickinger, Tabor E, O'Hagan, Thomas, Chisolm, Margaret S·2015·JMIR Medical Education

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As the use of social media (SM) tools becomes increasingly widespread, medical trainees need guidance on applying principles of professionalism to their online behavior. OBJECTIVE: To develop a curriculum to improve knowledge and skills regarding professionalism of SM use by medical students. METHODS: This project was conducted in 3 phases: (1) a needs assessment was performed via a survey of medical students regarding SM use, rationale for and frequency of use, and concerns; (2) a workshop-format curriculum was designed and piloted for preclinical students to gain foundational knowledge of online professionalism; and (3) a complementary longitudinal SM-based curriculum was designed and piloted for clinical students to promote both medical humanism and professionalism. RESULTS: A total of 72 medical students completed the survey (response rate 30%). Among the survey respondents, 71/72 (99%) reported visiting social networking sites, with 55/72 (76%) reporting daily visits. Privacy of personal information (62/72, 86%) and mixing of personal/professional identities (49/72, 68%) were the students' most commonly endorsed concerns regarding SM use. The workshop-format curriculum was evaluated qualitatively via participant feedback. Of the 120 students who participated in the workshop, 91 completed the post workshop evaluation (response rate 76%), with 56 positive comments and 54 suggestions for improvement. The workshop was experienced by students as enjoyable, thought provoking, informative, and relevant. Suggestions for improvement included adjustments to timing, format, and content of the workshop. The SM-based curriculum was evaluated by a small-scale pilot of 11 students, randomized to the intervention group (participation in faculty-moderated blog) or the control group. Outcomes were assessed quantitatively and qualitatively via personal growth scales, participant feedback, and analysis of blog themes. There was a trend toward improvement in total personal growth scores among those students in the blog group from 3.65 (0.47) to 4.11 (0.31) (mean [SD]) with no change observed for the students in the control group (3.89 [0.11] before and after evaluation). Themes relevant to humanism and professionalism were observed in the blog discussion. CONCLUSIONS: Most medical students surveyed reported using SM and identified privacy and personal-professional boundaries as areas of concern. The workshop format and SM-based curricula were well-received by students whose formative feedback will inform the refinement and further development of efforts to promote professionalism among medical students.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/mededu.4886

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In 4 studies including medical students, educational interventions were positively accepted by students and showed a positive impact on the way they view themselves and their use of social media.

    “In 4 studies that included medical students as participants [46,48,60,63], educational interventions were positively accepted by students and showed a positive impact on the way they view themselves and their use of SM.”

    From Dangers and Benefits of Social Media on E-Professionalism of Health Care Professionals: Scoping Review (2021) · cites this paper as [46]

    The Results report that medical students received the workshop positively, and the Abstract Results report a trend toward improved personal-growth scores in the small blog-intervention group. But the Discussion (Limitations) says social-media use outside the workshop was not observed, so the paper cannot establish that the intervention changed students’ use of social media. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Benefits of social media on e-professionalism of health care professionals can be seen as improvements of established networks or possibilities for collaboration through social media sites.

    “Benefits of SM on e-professionalism of HCPs can be seen as improvements of established networks or possibilities for collaboration through SM sites [33, 34, 36, 38, 39, 44-46, 53, 69, 72, 76, 78, 79, 92, 97, 106-108, 117].”

    From Dangers and Benefits of Social Media on E-Professionalism of Health Care Professionals: Scoping Review (2021) · cites this paper as [46]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) describes social media as facilitating collaboration and networking, and says medical students use it to form supportive peer networks. It does not establish that social media improves existing networks or show this benefit across health care professionals generally. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • One medical school has developed workshop and blog-based interventions to promote professionalism among medical students using social media.

    “One medical school, for example, has developed workshop and blog-based interventions to promote professionalism among medical students using SM (33).”
  • Social media have enabled the creation of communities for support.

    “Besides providing the opportunity for connecting with others and sharing experiences [38,39,46,53,69,72,78,106-108], SM have enabled the creation of communities for support.”
  • Effectiveness of educational interventions about e-professionalism or impact of existing social media policies has been recognized in this review, since numerous studies explored educational interventions for promoting e-professionalism.

    “Effectiveness of educational interventions about e-professionalism or impact of existing SM policies has been recognized in this review, since numerous studies explored educational interventions for promoting e-professionalism [46,48,52,54,55,60,63,81,89,103].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [9]Thompson LA Dawson K Ferdig R Black EW Boyer J Coutts J Black NP The intersection of online social networking with medical professionalism J Gen Intern Med 2008 07 23 7 954 957 10.1007/s11606-008-0538-8 18612723 18612723 PMC2517936 · DOI · Paper page
  2. [37]Kind T Genrich G Sodhi A Chretien KC Social media policies at US medical schools Med Educ Online 2010 15 10.3402/meo.v15i0.5324 20859533 PMC2941429 20859533 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [38]American Medical Association Professionalism in the Use of Social Media 2015 2015-05-19 Chicago, IL American Medical Association http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/physician-resources/medical-ethics/code-medical-ethics/opinion9124.page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Flickinger, T. E., O'Hagan, T., & Chisolm, M. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • Musgrove Park Hospital (GB)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Flickinger, Tabor E
Venue
JMIR Medical Education
Published
2015-12-01
Volume
1
Issue
2
Pages
e17
ISSN
2369-3762 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2190772807
Cited by
34
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4
FWCI
3.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR Medical Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
professionalism, social media, medical students, curriculum development, online professionalism, humanism in medicine, workshop intervention, privacy concerns, personal and professional boundaries, preclinical medical students, clinical students, personal growth, needs assessment, medical education, professional identity formation, personal branding, self-presentation, social networking sites

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review