PreprintCited by 20Stroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryPhysical Activity and HealthBalance, Gait, and Falls Prevention

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Feasibility of ActivABLES to promote home-based exercise and physical activity of community-dwelling stroke survivors with support from caregivers: A mixed methods study (Preprint)

Open access
Olafsdottir, Steinunn A., Jónsdóttir, Helga, Bjartmarz, Ingibjörg, Magnusson, Charlotte, Caltenco, Héctor, Kytö, Mikko, Laura, Maye, McGookin, David, Arnadottir, Solveig Asa, Hjaltadóttir, Ingibjörg, Hafsteinsdóttir, Thóra B.·2019·BMC Health Services Research

Preprint — published as 10.1186/s12913-020-05432-x · Paper page

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Technical applications can promote home-based exercise and physical activity of community-dwelling stroke survivors to improve function and decrease physical inactivity and sedentary behavior. Informal caregivers are often able and willing to assist with home-based exercise and physical activity but may lack knowledge and practical resources. ActivABLES is an international collaboration which was established to promote home-based exercise and physical activity among community-dwelling stroke survivors, with support from their caregivers. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to investigate the feasibility of ActivABLES in terms of acceptability, demand, implementation and practicality. METHODS: We conducted a mixed methods study with 10 community-dwelling stroke survivors, including five women and five men, with the median age of 72 years, who used ActivABLES for four weeks with support from their caregivers (seven women and three men, median age 68 years). Data collection included quantitative functional standardized measures of the stroke survivors before and after the 4-week use. Additionally, qualitative data was collected through individual semi-structured interviews with the stroke survivors and their caregivers after the 4-week use. Quantitative and qualitative data were also collected during the 4-week use. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze quantitative data and Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to analyze changes between the measures before and after the 4-week use. Qualitative data were analyzed with direct content analysis to identify subcategories to define the data further in context with the predetermined categories. RESULTS: Acceptability was identified in four subcategories: appreciation, functional improvements, self-initiated activities and expressed potential use for future stroke survivors. Functional improvements of the stroke survivors were confirmed by quantitative and qualitative data and some mentioned changes in physical activity and self-initiated activities. All participants described ActivABLES to be feasible and to have potential for future stroke survivors. Demand was identified in three subcategories: reported use, interest in further use and need for follow-up. Most of the stroke survivors did follow the recommendation of using ActivABLES, confirmed by quantitative and qualitative data and showed interest in further use. Implementation was identified in three subcatagories: importance of feedback, variety of exercises and progression of exercises. Visual feedback was thought to be important and encouraging for continuing. About half of the stroke survivors felt that there was a lack of variation in exercises and about half used the progression of exercises. Practicality was identified in two subcatagories: need for support and technical problems. All participants agreed there was little need for support while using ActivABLES and the stroke survivors only needed minor assistance. All particants experienced some technical problems. CONCLUSIONS: The results from this study indicate that ActivABLES is feasible and can be a good asset for stroke survivors with slight or moderate disability to use in their homes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/preprints.14576

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 82

  1. 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.11.014 · DOI
  2. 10.5772/35682 · DOI
  3. 10.7326/M14-1651 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.2522/ptj.20130175 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1179/1945511915y.0000000009 · DOI
  6. 10.1080/10749357.2016.1200292 · DOI
  7. 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2012.00880.x · DOI
  8. 10.1155/2016/9476541 · DOI
  9. 10.3109/09638288.2016.1140836 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.jphys.2014.08.012 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.jphys.2014.08.012 · DOI
  12. 10.1186/s12883-015-0440-z · DOI
  13. 10.1111/hsc.12190 · DOI
  14. 10.1161/strokeaha.110.594689 · DOI
  15. 10.3109/09638288.2016.1162853 · DOI
  16. 10.1002/14651858.CD011058.pub2 · DOI
  17. 10.1080/09638280802356369 · DOI
  18. 10.5535/arm.2018.42.3.406 · DOI
  19. 10.1310/tsr2101-63 · DOI
  20. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.00430 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.pec.2010.07.046 · DOI
  22. 10.1002/pri.1719 · DOI
  23. 10.2196/rehab.5079 · DOI
  24. 10.1177/0269215516637893 · DOI
  25. 10.4172/2329-9096.1000418 · DOI
  26. 10.1109/gem.2014.7118436 · DOI
  27. 10.1177/0269215516631384 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.06.014 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1371/journal.pone.0093318 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1089/tmj.2016.0129 · DOI
  31. 10.1177/0269215514542638 · DOI
  32. 10.1097/md.0000000000003032 · DOI
  33. 10.1177/0163278718784998 · DOI
  34. 10.1177/1545968316666957 · DOI
  35. 10.1002/14651858.CD008349.pub4 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1136/bmj.a1655 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.12.001 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.02.002 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1161/01.str.19.12.1497 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.2196/preprints.14573 · DOI
  42. 10.3233/978-1-61499-923-2-847 · DOI
  43. 10.1145/3236112.3236145 · DOI
  44. 10.1145/3173225.3173269 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/s0004-9514(14)60296-8 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/j.pmrj.2011.11.004 · DOI
  47. 10.2522/ptj.20070205 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.09.010 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.08.336 · DOI
  50. 10.1080/09638280400008982 · DOI
  51. 10.1080/16501970410017215 · DOI
  52. 10.1310/tsr2103-197 · DOI
  53. 10.1016/0002-9343(85)90465-6 · DOI
  54. 10.1590/s1413-35552012005000155 · DOI
  55. 10.5014/ajot.39.6.386 · DOI
  56. 10.1191/0269215505cr832oa · DOI
  57. 10.1682/jrrd.2009.09.0155 · DOI
  58. 10.1037/t07034-000 · DOI
  59. 10.1123/jsep.26.2.191 · DOI · Paper page
  60. 10.4081/hpr.2014.1008 · DOI
  61. 10.1016/j.psychsport.2012.03.009 · DOI
  62. 10.2196/jmir.1602 · DOI · Paper page
  63. 10.1080/08870440701405704 · DOI · Paper page
  64. 10.1016/s1469-0292(03)00003-7 · DOI
  65. 10.1007/s12160-008-9059-2 · DOI
  66. 10.1016/j.psychres.2013.10.004 · DOI
  67. 10.1016/j.jshs.2016.02.002 · DOI · Paper page
  68. 10.3390/s100807772 · DOI · Paper page
  69. 10.1155/2013/464176 · DOI · Paper page
  70. 10.1177/1049732305276687 · DOI · Paper page
  71. 10.1177/0049124197026001001 · DOI
  72. 10.1161/01.str.31.6.1210 · DOI
  73. 10.1016/s1474-4422(09)70150-4 · DOI
  74. 10.1310/tsr1504-365 · DOI
  75. 10.1161/strokeaha.114.004695 · DOI
  76. 10.1093/ptj/pzx038 · DOI
  77. 10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04802-X · DOI
  78. 10.1089/g4h.2016.0108 · DOI
  79. 10.1249/mss.0b013e3182a0595f · DOI
  80. 10.3109/09638288.2014.918190 · DOI
  81. 10.3109/17483107.2013.845611 · DOI
  82. 10.17083/ijsg.v5i1.224 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Olafsdottir, S. A., Jónsdóttir, H., Bjartmarz, I., Magnusson, C., Caltenco, H., Kytö, M., Laura, M., McGookin, D., Arnadottir, S. A., Hjaltadóttir, I., & Hafsteinsdóttir, T. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Iceland (IS)
  • National University Hospital of Iceland (IS)
  • Lund University (SE)
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • Aalto University (FI)
Corresponding author
Olafsdottir, Steinunn A.
Venue
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2019-05-02
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
562-562
ISSN
1472-6963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3036797731
Cited by
20
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • BMC Health Services Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Aaltodoc (Aalto University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
  • Opin vísindi (Opin vísindi) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Hirsla (Landspítali University Hospital) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • NordForsk
  • Rannís (190634-051)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Keywords
stroke survivors, home-based exercise, physical activity, caregiver support, feasibility, acceptability, implementation, practicality, balance, gait, motion sensors, wearable sensors, community-dwelling stroke survivors, informal caregivers, exercise feedback, exercise progression, technology-assisted rehabilitation, Berg Balance Scale, Timed Up and Go test, Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test
MeSH terms
Stroke Rehabilitation, Aged, Exercise Therapy, Feasibility Studies, Female, Persons with Disabilities, Disabled Persons, Home Care Services, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Social Support, Caregivers, Survivors, Qualitative Research, Independent Living

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review