The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Feasibility of ActivABLES to promote home-based exercise and physical activity of community-dwelling stroke survivors with support from caregivers: A mixed methods study (Preprint)
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1186/s12913-020-05432-x · Paper page
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Technical applications can promote home-based exercise and physical activity of community-dwelling stroke survivors to improve function and decrease physical inactivity and sedentary behavior. Informal caregivers are often able and willing to assist with home-based exercise and physical activity but may lack knowledge and practical resources. ActivABLES is an international collaboration which was established to promote home-based exercise and physical activity among community-dwelling stroke survivors, with support from their caregivers. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to investigate the feasibility of ActivABLES in terms of acceptability, demand, implementation and practicality. METHODS: We conducted a mixed methods study with 10 community-dwelling stroke survivors, including five women and five men, with the median age of 72 years, who used ActivABLES for four weeks with support from their caregivers (seven women and three men, median age 68 years). Data collection included quantitative functional standardized measures of the stroke survivors before and after the 4-week use. Additionally, qualitative data was collected through individual semi-structured interviews with the stroke survivors and their caregivers after the 4-week use. Quantitative and qualitative data were also collected during the 4-week use. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze quantitative data and Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to analyze changes between the measures before and after the 4-week use. Qualitative data were analyzed with direct content analysis to identify subcategories to define the data further in context with the predetermined categories. RESULTS: Acceptability was identified in four subcategories: appreciation, functional improvements, self-initiated activities and expressed potential use for future stroke survivors. Functional improvements of the stroke survivors were confirmed by quantitative and qualitative data and some mentioned changes in physical activity and self-initiated activities. All participants described ActivABLES to be feasible and to have potential for future stroke survivors. Demand was identified in three subcategories: reported use, interest in further use and need for follow-up. Most of the stroke survivors did follow the recommendation of using ActivABLES, confirmed by quantitative and qualitative data and showed interest in further use. Implementation was identified in three subcatagories: importance of feedback, variety of exercises and progression of exercises. Visual feedback was thought to be important and encouraging for continuing. About half of the stroke survivors felt that there was a lack of variation in exercises and about half used the progression of exercises. Practicality was identified in two subcatagories: need for support and technical problems. All participants agreed there was little need for support while using ActivABLES and the stroke survivors only needed minor assistance. All particants experienced some technical problems. CONCLUSIONS: The results from this study indicate that ActivABLES is feasible and can be a good asset for stroke survivors with slight or moderate disability to use in their homes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Feigin, V. L., Forouzanfar, M. H., Krishnamurthi, R., Mensah, G. A., Connor, M., Bennett, D. A., Moran, A. E., Sacco, R. L., Anderson, L., Truelsen, T., et al. (2014) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)61953-4 · Cited by 3,899
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 82
- 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.11.014 · DOI
- 10.5772/35682 · DOI
- 10.7326/M14-1651 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2522/ptj.20130175 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1179/1945511915y.0000000009 · DOI
- 10.1080/10749357.2016.1200292 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2012.00880.x · DOI
- 10.1155/2016/9476541 · DOI
- 10.3109/09638288.2016.1140836 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jphys.2014.08.012 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jphys.2014.08.012 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12883-015-0440-z · DOI
- 10.1111/hsc.12190 · DOI
- 10.1161/strokeaha.110.594689 · DOI
- 10.3109/09638288.2016.1162853 · DOI
- 10.1002/14651858.CD011058.pub2 · DOI
- 10.1080/09638280802356369 · DOI
- 10.5535/arm.2018.42.3.406 · DOI
- 10.1310/tsr2101-63 · DOI
- 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.00430 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.pec.2010.07.046 · DOI
- 10.1002/pri.1719 · DOI
- 10.2196/rehab.5079 · DOI
- 10.1177/0269215516637893 · DOI
- 10.4172/2329-9096.1000418 · DOI
- 10.1109/gem.2014.7118436 · DOI
- 10.1177/0269215516631384 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.06.014 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0093318 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1089/tmj.2016.0129 · DOI
- 10.1177/0269215514542638 · DOI
- 10.1097/md.0000000000003032 · DOI
- 10.1177/0163278718784998 · DOI
- 10.1177/1545968316666957 · DOI
- 10.1002/14651858.CD008349.pub4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1136/bmj.a1655 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.12.001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.02.002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1161/01.str.19.12.1497 · DOI
- 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2196/preprints.14573 · DOI
- 10.3233/978-1-61499-923-2-847 · DOI
- 10.1145/3236112.3236145 · DOI
- 10.1145/3173225.3173269 · DOI
- 10.1016/s0004-9514(14)60296-8 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.pmrj.2011.11.004 · DOI
- 10.2522/ptj.20070205 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.09.010 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.08.336 · DOI
- 10.1080/09638280400008982 · DOI
- 10.1080/16501970410017215 · DOI
- 10.1310/tsr2103-197 · DOI
- 10.1016/0002-9343(85)90465-6 · DOI
- 10.1590/s1413-35552012005000155 · DOI
- 10.5014/ajot.39.6.386 · DOI
- 10.1191/0269215505cr832oa · DOI
- 10.1682/jrrd.2009.09.0155 · DOI
- 10.1037/t07034-000 · DOI
- 10.1123/jsep.26.2.191 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.4081/hpr.2014.1008 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.psychsport.2012.03.009 · DOI
- 10.2196/jmir.1602 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/08870440701405704 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/s1469-0292(03)00003-7 · DOI
- 10.1007/s12160-008-9059-2 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.psychres.2013.10.004 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jshs.2016.02.002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3390/s100807772 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1155/2013/464176 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/1049732305276687 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0049124197026001001 · DOI
- 10.1161/01.str.31.6.1210 · DOI
- 10.1016/s1474-4422(09)70150-4 · DOI
- 10.1310/tsr1504-365 · DOI
- 10.1161/strokeaha.114.004695 · DOI
- 10.1093/ptj/pzx038 · DOI
- 10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04802-X · DOI
- 10.1089/g4h.2016.0108 · DOI
- 10.1249/mss.0b013e3182a0595f · DOI
- 10.3109/09638288.2014.918190 · DOI
- 10.3109/17483107.2013.845611 · DOI
- 10.17083/ijsg.v5i1.224 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Olafsdottir, S. A., Jónsdóttir, H., Bjartmarz, I., Magnusson, C., Caltenco, H., Kytö, M., Laura, M., McGookin, D., Arnadottir, S. A., Hjaltadóttir, I., & Hafsteinsdóttir, T. B.
- Affiliations
- University of Iceland (IS)
- National University Hospital of Iceland (IS)
- Lund University (SE)
- University of Helsinki (FI)
- Aalto University (FI)
- Corresponding author
- Olafsdottir, Steinunn A.
- ORCID
- Venue
- BMC Health Services Research
- Publisher
- JMIR Publications Inc.
- Published
- 2019-05-02
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 562-562
- ISSN
- 1472-6963 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7310069
- OpenAlex
- W3036797731
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 1.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- BMC Health Services Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Aaltodoc (Aalto University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
- Opin vísindi (Opin vísindi) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Hirsla (Landspítali University Hospital) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- NordForsk
- Rannís (190634-051)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Physical Activity and Health
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
- Keywords
- stroke survivors, home-based exercise, physical activity, caregiver support, feasibility, acceptability, implementation, practicality, balance, gait, motion sensors, wearable sensors, community-dwelling stroke survivors, informal caregivers, exercise feedback, exercise progression, technology-assisted rehabilitation, Berg Balance Scale, Timed Up and Go test, Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test
- MeSH terms
- Stroke Rehabilitation, Aged, Exercise Therapy, Feasibility Studies, Female, Persons with Disabilities, Disabled Persons, Home Care Services, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Social Support, Caregivers, Survivors, Qualitative Research, Independent Living
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review