Cited by 41Endometriosis Research and TreatmentEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and ManagementGynecological conditions and treatments

Plasma brain-derived neurotrophic factor in women with pelvic pain: A potential biomarker for endometriosis?

Rocha, Ana L, Vieira, Erica L, Ferreira, Márcia C, Maia, Laura M, Teixeira, Antonio L, Reis, Fernando M·2017·Biomarkers in Medicine

Abstract

AIM: To test whether plasma BDNF levels are useful to predict the presence of endometriosis in women with pelvic pain. PATIENTS & METHODS: Prospective cross-sectional study including 67 consecutive women aged 24-49 years, scheduled for laparoscopy due to chronic pelvic pain. Preoperative plasma samples were assayed for BDNF using a commercial enzyme immunoassay. RESULTS: Women with ovarian endometrioma had higher preoperative plasma BDNF (1063 ± 157 pg/ml) compared with women with other benign ovarian tumors (537 ± 131 pg/ml, F = 2.53; p = 0.02). However, plasma BDNF levels were not helpful to indicate the presence of peritoneal or deep infiltrating endometriosis. Plasma BDNF levels were positively correlated with the severity of pelvic pain (r = 0.489; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Plasma BDNF might be a biomarker of ovarian endometrioma but not a useful diagnostic marker to detect other forms of endometriosis in women with painful symptoms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2217/bmm-2016-0327

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rocha, A. L., Vieira, E. L., Ferreira, M. C., Maia, L. M., Teixeira, A. L., & Reis, F. M.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR)
  • Department of Internal Medicine,Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Venue
Biomarkers in Medicine
Published
2017-03-14
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
313-317
ISSN
  • 1752-0363 (ISSN-L)
  • 1752-0371
OpenAlex
W2601024278
Cited by
41
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2
FWCI
5.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biomarkers in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (311154/2015-8)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
Keywords
brain-derived neurotrophic factor, endometriosis, chronic pelvic pain, endometrioma, plasma biomarkers, diagnostic biomarkers, peritoneal endometriosis, deep infiltrating endometriosis, pain intensity
MeSH terms
Adult, Chronic Disease, Cross-Sectional Studies, Endometriosis, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Laparoscopy, Prospective Studies, ROC Curve, Severity of Illness Index, Biomarkers, Pelvic Pain, Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor, Area Under Curve, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review