Evaluation of microalgae as sources of digestible nutrients for monogastric animals
Open accessAbstract
The study was carried out to evaluate three microalgae as potential nutrient sources in diets for monogastric animals.In a digestibility experiment with adult mink (Mustela vison), the microalgae Nannochloropsis oceanica, Phaeodactylum tricornutum and Isochrysis galbana were fed at 60, 120 and 240 g kg -1 as is, replacing fish meal.The N. oceanica and P. tricornutum had similar crude protein (CP) content (47.7 and 49.0% of DM, respectively), amino acid composition and lipid content (8.4 and 7.4%, respectively), whereas I. galbana contained 20.1% CP and 16.2% lipids.There was a significant linear reduction in CP digestibility with increasing dietary inclusion of all algae products.The apparent CP digestibility determined by linear regression for N. oceanica, P. tricornutum and I. galbana was 35.5, 79.9 and 18.8%, respectively.The individual amino acid digestibilities showed acceptable values for P. tricornutum, but low and highly variable values for N. oceanica and I. galbana.Although the algae contributed a minor proportion of dietary lipids, lipid digestibility declined with increasing inclusion of all algae and especially with the highest level of N. oceanica.It was concluded from the mink study that among the investigated algae, P. tricornutum was the preferable source of digestible nutrients.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Non-cellulosic species like Isochrysis sp. and Spirulina sp. had similar higher protein digestibility of 86%.
“Other hand non-cellulosic species like Isochrysis sp. and Spirulina sp. had similar higher protein digestibility of 86% (Niccolai et al., 2019;Skrede et al., 2011).”
From Potential of microalgae as a sustainable feed ingredient for aquaculture (2021) · cites this paper as Skrede et al., 2011
In some cases, microalgae have lower protein content and higher carbohydrate content than conventional feed, reducing feed suitability.
“In some cases, microalgae have lower protein content and higher carbohydrate content than conventional feed -reducing feed suitability (Skrede et al., 2011).”
From Potential of microalgae as a sustainable feed ingredient for aquaculture (2021) · cites this paper as Skrede et al., 2011
Microalgae like Chlorella sp. and Nannochloropsis sp. have low digestibility due to the presence of non-starch substances and rigid cell walls.
“Microalgae like Chlorella sp., Nannochloropsis sp., etc., have low digestibility due to the presence of non-starch substances and rigid cell walls (Skrede et al., 2011).”
From Potential of microalgae as a sustainable feed ingredient for aquaculture (2021) · cites this paper as Skrede et al., 2011
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Micro-algae as a source of protein
Becker, E. W. (2007) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2006.11.002 · Cited by 2,311 · see citing works
Nutritional properties of microalgae for mariculture
Brown, M. R., Jeffrey, S. W., Volkman, J. K., & Dunstan, G. A. (1997) · Aquaculture · doi:10.1016/s0044-8486(96)01501-3 · Cited by 1,041 · see citing works
The amino-acid and sugar composition of 16 species of microalgae used in mariculture
Brown, M. R. (1991) · Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology · doi:10.1016/0022-0981(91)90007-j · Cited by 572 · see citing works
EFFECT OF NUTRIENT LIMITATION ON FATTY ACID AND LIPID CONTENT OF MARINE MICROALGAE1
Reitan, K. I., Rainuzzo, J. R., & Ôlsen, Y. (1994) · Journal of Phycology · doi:10.1111/j.0022-3646.1994.00972.x · Cited by 473 · see citing works
Self-citationQuantitative Measurement of Total Starch in Cereal Flours and Products
McCleary, B. V., Solah, V. A., & Gibson, T. S. (1994) · Journal of Cereal Science · doi:10.1006/jcrs.1994.1044 · Cited by 377 · see citing works
Sánchez‐Mirón, A., Cerón-García, M. C., Gómez, A. C., García-Camacho, F., Grima, E. M., & Yusuf Chisti, B. (2003) · Biochemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/s1369-703x(03)00072-x · Cited by 279 · see citing works
Yamaguchi, K. (1996) · Journal of Applied Phycology · doi:10.1007/bf02186327 · Cited by 263 · see citing works
Biomass Nutrient Profiles of the MicroalgaNannochloropsis
Rebolloso, M. M., Navarro-Pérez, A., García-Camacho, F., Miras, J. J. R., & Guil‐Guerrero, J. L. (2001) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf0010376 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Alonso, D. L., Belarbi, E., Fernández-Sevilla, J. M., Rodríguez‐Ruiz, J., & Grima, E. M. (2000) · Phytochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0031-9422(00)00084-4 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Digestibility of bacterial protein grown on natural gas in mink, pigs, chicken and Atlantic salmon
Skrede, A., Berge, G. M., Storebakken, T., et al. (1998) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/s0377-8401(98)00208-9 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Self-citationEffects of nutrition on larval growth and survival in bivalves
Marshall, R. D., McKinley, S., & Pearce, C. M. (2010) · Reviews in Aquaculture · doi:10.1111/j.1753-5131.2010.01022.x · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Sandnes, J. M., Källqvist, T., Wenner, D., & Gislerød, H. R. (2005) · Journal of Applied Phycology · doi:10.1007/s10811-005-9002-x · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Self-citationBrown, M. R., Garland, C. D., Jeffrey, S. W., Jameson, I. D., & LeRoi, J. (1993) · Journal of Applied Phycology · doi:10.1007/bf02186231 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Screening of lipase inhibitors from marine algae
Bitou, N., Ninomiya, M., Tsujita, T., & Okuda, H. (1999) · Lipids · doi:10.1007/s11745-999-0383-7 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Pettersen, A. K., Turchini, G. M., Jahangard, S., et al. (2010) · Aquaculture · doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.09.024 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Microalgae for Aquaculture: The Nutritional Value of Microalgae for Aquaculture
Becker, W. (2003) · doi:10.1002/9780470995280.ch21 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Albentosa, M., Pérez-Camacho, A., Labarta, U., & Fernández‐Reiriz, M. J. (1996) · Aquaculture · doi:10.1016/s0044-8486(96)01405-6 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Sánchez, S., Martı́nez, M., & Espínola, F. (2000) · Biochemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/s1369-703x(00)00071-1 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Albentosa, M., Pérez-Camacho, A., Labarta, U., et al. (1997) · Aquaculture · doi:10.1016/s0044-8486(97)00057-4 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Utilization of Fish and Animal Byproducts in Mink Nutrition
Skrede, A. (1979) · Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica · doi:10.1080/00015127909435235 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Self-citationUtilization of Fish and Animal Byproducts in Mink Nutrition
Skrede, A. (1981) · Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica · doi:10.1080/00015128109435316 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Self-citationSzymeczko, R., & Skrede, A. (1990) · Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica · doi:10.1080/00015129009438018 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Self-citationFábregas, J., Otero, A., Morales, E., et al. (1998) · Aquaculture · doi:10.1016/s0044-8486(98)00376-7 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
The nutritional quality of drum-dried algae produced in open door mass culture
Saleh, A. M., Hussein, L., Abdalla, F. E., El-Fouly, M. M., & Shaheen, A. B. (1985) · Zeitschrift für Ernährungswissenschaft · doi:10.1007/bf02023671 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Spolaore P., Joannis-Cassan C., Duran E., Isambert A., 2006. Review. Commercial application of microalgae. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 101, 87-96
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Microalgae in aquafeeds for a sustainable aquaculture industry
Shah, M. R., Lutzu, G. A., Alam, A., Sarker, P., Kabir Chowdhury, M. A., Parsaeimehr, A., Liang, Y., & Daroch, M. (2018) · Journal of Applied Phycology · doi:10.1007/s10811-017-1234-z · Cited by 463 · see citing works
Potential of microalgae as a sustainable feed ingredient for aquaculture
Nagappan, S., Das, P., AbdulQuadir, M., Thaher, M., Khan, S., Mahata, C., Al-Jabri, H., Vatland, A. K., & Kumar, G. (2021) · Journal of Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2021.09.003 · Cited by 364 · see citing works
Chauton, M. S., Reitan, K. I., Norsker, N. H., Tveterås, R., & Kleivdal, H. T. (2015) · Aquaculture · doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2014.10.038 · Cited by 323 · see citing works
Self-citationMicroalgal-based feed: Promising alternative feedstocks for livestock and poultry production
Saadaoui, I., Rasheed, R., Aguilar, A., Cherif, M., Al Jabri, H., Sayadi, S., & Manning, S. R. (2021) · Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology · doi:10.1186/s40104-021-00593-z · Cited by 223 · see citing works
The Application of Single-Cell Ingredients in Aquaculture Feeds—A Review
Glencross, B. D., Huyben, D., & Schrama, J. W. (2020) · Fishes · doi:10.3390/fishes5030022 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Ryckebosch, E., Bruneel, C., Termote-Verhalle, R., Muylaert, K., & Foubert, I. (2014) · Algal Research · doi:10.1016/j.algal.2013.11.001 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
A Comprehensive Overview on Microalgal-Fortified/Based Food and Beverages
Sidari, R., & Tofalo, R. (2019) · Food Reviews International · doi:10.1080/87559129.2019.1608557 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Gong, Y., Guterres, H. A. D. S., Huntley, M., Sørensen, M., & Kiron, V. (2018) · Aquaculture Nutrition · doi:10.1111/anu.12533 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Expanded utilisation of microalgae in global aquafeeds
Siddik, M. A. B., Sørensen, M., Islam, S. M. M., Saha, N., Rahman, M. A., & Francis, D. S. (2024) · Reviews in Aquaculture · doi:10.1111/raq.12818 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Tibbetts, S. M., Yasumaru, F., & Lemos, D. (2017) · Algal Research · doi:10.1016/j.algal.2016.11.010 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Wang, Y., Tibbetts, S. M., Berrue, F., McGinn, P. J., MacQuarrie, S. P., Puttaswamy, A., Patelakis, S., Schmidt, D., Melanson, R., & MacKenzie, S. E. (2020) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods9111531 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
- Authors
- Skrede, A., Mydland, L., Ahlstrøm, Ø., Reitan, K., Gislerød, H., & Øverland, M.
- Affiliations
- Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NO)
- SINTEF (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Skrede, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences
- Published
- 2011-03-12
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 131-142
- ISSN
- 1230-1388 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2040192912
- Cited by
- 104
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 4.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Norges Forskningsråd (172580/S40)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
- Keywords
- microalgae, Nannochloropsis oceanica, Phaeodactylum tricornutum, Isochrysis galbana, mink, fish meal replacement, protein digestibility, amino acid digestibility, fat digestibility, alternative feed ingredients
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review