Cited by 453Child and Animal Learning DevelopmentChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentEmotions and Moral Behavior

An Observational Study of Children's Attempts to Monitor Their Expressive Behavior

Saarni, Carolyn·1984·Child Development

Abstract

SAARNI, CAROLYN. An Observational Study of Children's Attempts to Monitor Their Expressive Behavior. CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 1984, 55, 1504-1513. This observational study examined developmental patterns in children's attempts to regulate their expressive behavior in a mildly conflictful situation that was contrived by creating expectations in children for receiving a desirable reward but in fact receiving an undesirable one. This situation provided a limited sample of children's expressive behavior when faced with an implied display rule: Look pleased, despite receiving a disappointing gift. Videotapes of the children's expressive behavior were analyzed, and the major findings included significant age x sex interactions wherein the youngest children (especially boys) were more likely to show negative behavior on receiving an undesirable gift (i.e., a drab baby toy), while the older children (especially girls) were more likely to maintain their positive expressive behavior. The results are discussed in terms of developmental differences in (a) awareness of social rules for management of expressive behavior, (b) ability to implement the rule, and (c) motivation to carry out the rule.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1130020

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In disappointment task studies, girls displayed less negative emotion than boys in front of the experimenter.

    “In studies using variations of the disappointment task, girls have been found to display less negative emotion than boys and to show more cheeriness than boys when they are in front of the experimenter (e.g., Cole, 1986; Saarni,1984).”
  • In disappointment task studies, girls showed more cheeriness than boys in front of the experimenter.

    “In studies using variations of the disappointment task, girls have been found to display less negative emotion than boys and to show more cheeriness than boys when they are in front of the experimenter (e.g., Cole, 1986; Saarni,1984).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saarni, C.
Affiliations
Sonoma State University (US)
Corresponding author
Saarni, Carolyn
Venue
Child Development
Published
1984-08
Volume
55
Issue
4
Pages
1504
ISSN
0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2016909795
Cited by
453
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 14
FWCI
3.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Child Development (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
Keywords
expressive behavior, self-regulation, display rules, children's emotional expression, age differences, sex differences, disappointment, reward anticipation, developmental patterns

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review