The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Evaluation Research
Abstract
Evaluation researchers, traditionally considered to be users of quantitative methods, are now actively exploring the qualitative aspects of the performance of the programmes they are evaluating. Rather than argue the validity of either the quantitative or the qualitative approach, most of the noted contributors to this volume conclude that both are required for comprehensive evaluation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x033007014 · Cited by 11,170
Toward a Conceptual Framework for Mixed-Method Evaluation Designs
Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989) · Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis · doi:10.3102/01623737011003255 · Cited by 5,687
Problems of Reliability and Validity in Ethnographic Research
LeCompte, M. D., & Goetz, J. P. (1982) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543052001031 · Cited by 1,740
Morgan, D. L. (1998) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/104973239800800307 · Cited by 1,374
Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1982) · ECTJ · doi:10.1007/bf02765185 · Cited by 1,186
Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: a review of the literature.
Murphy, Dingwall, Greatbatch, Parker, & Watson (1998) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta2160 · Cited by 1,107
How to Conduct a Mixed Methods Study: Recent Trends in a Rapidly Growing Literature
Small, M. L. (2011) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102657 · Cited by 829
Meaning in Method: The Rhetoric of Quantitative and Qualitative Research
FIRESTONE, W. A. (1987) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x016007016 · Cited by 738
SMITH, J. K., & HESHUSIUS, L. (1986) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x015001004 · Cited by 675
Data Analysis Strategies for Mixed-Method Evaluation Designs
Caracelli, V. J., & Greene, J. C. (1993) · Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis · doi:10.3102/01623737015002195 · Cited by 627
Methodological Issues in Combining Diverse Study Types in Systematic Reviews
Harden, A., & Thomas, J. (2005) · International Journal of Social Research Methodology · doi:10.1080/13645570500155078 · Cited by 371
Coleman, G., & O’Connor, R. (2007) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2007.02.011 · Cited by 204
Single-case methodology in psychotherapy process and outcome research
Hilliard, R. B. (1993) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.61.3.373 · Cited by 198
Photographic visions and narrative inquiry
Harrison, B. (2002) · Narrative Inquiry · doi:10.1075/ni.12.1.14har · Cited by 172
Tolman, D. L., & Szalacha, L. A. (1999) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00338.x · Cited by 151
Qualitative and quantitative inquiries are not incompatible: A call for a new partnership
Reichardt, C. S., & Rallis, S. F. (1994) · New Directions for Program Evaluation · doi:10.1002/ev.1670 · Cited by 151
Self-citationSchiele, J. J., & McCue, C. P. (2011) · Journal of Public Procurement · doi:10.1108/jopp-11-02-2011-b003 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Brinberg, D., Cook, T. D., & Reichardt, C. S.
- Venue
- Educational Researcher
- Published
- 1981-08
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 29
- ISSN
- 0013-189X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2076191055
- Cited by
- 914
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 57.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
