Cited by 3,322Customer Service Quality and LoyaltyService and Product InnovationConsumer Behavior and Marketing Influence

Reassessment of expectations as a comparison standard in measuring service quality: Implications for further research

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, Valarie A., Berry, Leonard L.·1994·Journal of Marketing

Abstract

The authors respond to concerns raised by Cronin and Taylor (1992) and Teas (1993) about the SERVQUAL instrument and the perceptions-minus-expectations specification invoked by it to operationalize service quality. After demonstrating that the validity and alleged severity of many of those concerns are questionable, they offer a set of research directions for addressing unresolved issues and adding to the understanding of service quality assessment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/002224299405800109

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L.
Affiliations
  • Texas A&M University (US)
  • Partner, Schmalensee and Zeithaml.
Venue
Journal of Marketing
Published
1994-01
Volume
58
Issue
1
Pages
111-124
ISSN
  • 0022-2429 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-7185
OpenAlex
W1979522819
Cited by
3,322
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 91 · 2022: 86 · 2021: 137 · 2020: 122 · 2019: 129 · 2018: 127 · 2017: 130 · 2016: 129 · 2015: 150 · 2014: 198 · 2013: 195 · 2012: 181
FWCI
85.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Marketing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Service and Product Innovation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
Keywords
service quality, SERVQUAL, comparison standards, service quality evaluation, research directions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review