Cited by 246Folklore, Mythology, and Literature StudiesPhysical education and sports games researchCultural and Sociopolitical Studies

The Study of Games

Georges, Robert A., Avedon, Elliott M., Sutton-Smith, Brian·1975·Western Folklore

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1499097

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The meaning of games is in part a function of the ideas of those who think about them.

    “There is overwhelming evidence in all this that the meaning of games is, in part, a function of the ideas of those who think about them.”

    From Do We Need Real-Time Hermeneutics? Structures of Meaning in Games (2011) · cites this paper as Avedon and Sutton-Smith (1971, 438)

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Georges, R. A., Avedon, E. M., & Sutton-Smith, B.
Venue
Western Folklore
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1975-04
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
155
ISSN
0043-373X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1874946964
Cited by
244
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 15
FWCI
166.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Western Folklore (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Physical education and sports games research
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Museology › Cultural and Sociopolitical Studies
Keywords
games, play

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review