Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women's Lives.

Connell, R. W., Harding, Sandra·1992·Contemporary Sociology

DOI 10.2307/2075914

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2075914

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens
Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20237 · Cited by 2,433
Conceptualizing Epistemic Oppression
Dotson, K. (2014) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2013.782585 · Cited by 1,232
Relational Knowing and Epistemic Injustice: Toward a Theory of Willful Hermeneutical Ignorance
Pohlhaus, G. (2012) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01222.x · Cited by 745
The Method Section as Conceptual Epicenter in Constructing Social Science Research Reports
Smagorinsky, P. (2008) · Written Communication · doi:10.1177/0741088308317815 · Cited by 549
Decolonizing research paradigms in the context of settler colonialism: An unsettling, mutual, and collaborative effort
Held, M. B. E. (2019) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/1609406918821574 · Cited by 281
Diffraction or reflection? Sketching the contours of two methodologies in educational research
Bozalek, V., & Zembylas, M. (2017) · International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education · doi:10.1080/09518398.2016.1201166 · Cited by 249
Trippin’ Over the Color Line: The Invisibility of Race in Library and Information Studies
Honma, T. (2005) · InterActions: UCLA Journal of Education and Information Studies · doi:10.5070/d412000540 · Cited by 187
Masculinist Epistemologies and the Politics of Fieldwork in Latin Americanist Geography
Sundberg, J. (2003) · The Professional Geographer · doi:10.1111/0033-0124.5502006 · Cited by 172
Whose voices? Whose knowledge? A feminist analysis of the value of key informant interviews
Lokot, M. (2021) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/1609406920948775 · Cited by 154
C URRENT C ONTROVERSIES IN F EMINIST T HEORY
Dietz, M. G. (2003) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.6.121901.085635 · Cited by 145
Why Diversity Matters: Understanding and Applying the Diversity Component of the National Science Foundation’s Broader Impacts Criterion
Intemann, K. (2009) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691720903364134 · Cited by 145
Scientific and lay communities: earning epistemic trust through knowledge sharing
Grasswick, H. E. (2010) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-010-9789-0 · Cited by 140
Power, Positionality, and the Ethic of Care in Qualitative Research
Reich, J. A. (2021) · Qualitative Sociology · doi:10.1007/s11133-021-09500-4 · Cited by 133
Embodied faith: Islam, religious freedom and educational practices in physical education
Benn, T., Dagkas, S., & Jawad, H. (2011) · Sport, Education and Society · doi:10.1080/13573322.2011.531959 · Cited by 127
Obscuring power structures in the physics classroom: Linking teacher positioning, student engagement, and physics identity development: TEACHER POSITIONING AND STUDENT PHYSICS IDENTITY
Hazari, Z., Cass, C., & Beattie, C. (2015) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21214 · Cited by 111
Citizen Knowledge: Markets, Experts, and the Infrastructure of Democracy
Herzog, L. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197681718.001.0001 · Cited by 80
Gender ratios in high school science departments: The effect of percent female faculty on multiple dimensions of students' science identities
Gilmartin, S., Denson, N., Li, E., Bryant, A., & Aschbacher, P. (2007) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20179 · Cited by 56
Values, objectivity and credibility of scientists in a contentious natural resource debate
Yamamoto, Y. T. (2012) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662510371435 · Cited by 50
From Lived Experience to Insight: Unpacking the Psychological Risks of Using AI Conversational Agents
Chandra, M., Naik, S., Ford, D., Okoli, E., De Choudhury, M., Ershadi, M., Ramos, G., Hernandez, J., Bhattacharjee, A., Warreth, S., et al. (2025) · Proceedings of the 2025 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3715275.3732063 · Cited by 44
Solidarity in crisis? Community responses to refugees and forced migrants in the Greek islands
Fotaki, M. (2022) · Organization · doi:10.1177/13505084211051048 · Cited by 44
What's fair is… fair? Presenting JustEFAB, an ethical framework for operationalizing medical ethics and social justice in the integration of clinical machine learning
Mccradden, M., Odusi, O., Joshi, S., Akrout, I., Ndlovu, K., Glocker, B., Maicas, G., Liu, X., Mazwi, M., Garnett, T., et al. (2023) · 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3593013.3594096 · Cited by 33
‘She's not good with crying’: the effect of gender expectations on graduate students' assessments of their principal investigators
Hirshfield, L. E. (2014) · Gender and Education · doi:10.1080/09540253.2014.940036 · Cited by 20

Authors: Connell, R. W., & Harding, S.
Venue: Contemporary Sociology
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Published: 1992-07
Volume: 21
Issue: 4
Pages: 536
ISSN: 0094-3061 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.2307/2075914
OpenAlex: W4255492275
Cited by: 2,641
References: 0
FWCI: 226.53
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review