Cited by 120China's Socioeconomic Reforms and GovernancePolitical Conflict and GovernanceChinese history and philosophy

Internal Government Assessments of the Quality of Governance in China

Dimitrov, Martin K.·2015·Studies in Comparative International Development

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12116-014-9170-2

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A large literature on authoritarian politics shows the centrality of information control and propaganda for authoritarian rule.

    “Although not considered by Earl’s typology (19), a large literature on authoritarian politics shows the centrality of information control and propaganda for authoritarian rule (106–111).”

    From Physical and virtual repertoires of contention (2022) · cites this paper as [110]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dimitrov, M. K.
Affiliations
Tulane University (US)
Corresponding author
Dimitrov, Martin K.
Venue
Studies in Comparative International Development
Published
2014-11-28
Volume
50
Issue
1
Pages
50-72
ISSN
  • 0039-3606 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-6167
OpenAlex
W2001649122
Cited by
120
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1
FWCI
34.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Studies in Comparative International Development (publishedVersion)
Funders
Chinese Academy of Sciences
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Chinese history and philosophy
Keywords
governance quality, petitions, authoritarian regimes, information gathering, regime stability, corruption monitoring, public trust in government, protest, policy implementation, China

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review