Cited by 98Workplace Health and Well-beingStress and Burnout ResearchRecreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management

Leisure as a coping resource: a test of the job demand-control-support model

Joudrey, Allan D., Wallace, Jean E.·2009·Human Relations

Abstract

This article explores whether leisure is an effective coping resource in response to the demands of one's job and in reducing depression. Karasek's job demand-control-support (JDCS) model of psychological strain serves as a framework for empirically examining the importance of leisure in reducing depression and buffering the detrimental effects of excessive job demands. This article relies on data from a sample of 887 law firm lawyers who are renowned for working in highly stressful work settings. We find that participating in active and social leisure activities or taking a vacation are important in reducing lawyers' depression, whereas participating in passive leisure is not. None of the leisure variables buffer the harmful effects of job demands on depression. We discuss the implications of these findings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0018726708100357

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The studies controlled for various variables to rule out alternative explanations and isolate the effects of leisure crafting.

    “In addition to the controls used in Studies 1a and 1b, and to rule out alternative explanations and more accurately isolate the effects of LC on our variables of interest, we controlled for the following variables: sleep quantity, sleep quality, recovery experiences (psychological detachment, relaxation, and mastery; Sonnentag et al., 2008), passive leisure (e.g., watching tv; Joudrey and Wallace,”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Joudrey, A. D., & Wallace, J. E.
Affiliations
University of Calgary (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Joudrey, Allan D.
  • Wallace, Jean E.
Venue
Human Relations
Published
2009-02
Volume
62
Issue
2
Pages
195-217
ISSN
  • 0018-7267 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-282X
OpenAlex
W2135363543
Cited by
98
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
9.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Human Relations (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
Keywords
leisure, coping resources, demand-control-support model, depression, job demands, psychological strain, holidays, physical recreation, social leisure, passive leisure, occupational stress

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review