The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Items 201–224 of 224
Generational Differences in Work Ethic: Fact or Fiction?
Zabel, K. L., Biermeier-Hanson, B. B. J., Baltes, B. B., Early, B. J., & Shepard, A. (2017) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-016-9466-5 · Cited by 101
A meta-analysis of vibrotactile and visual information displays for improving task performance
Prewett, M. S., Elliott, L. R., Walvoord, A. G., & Coovert, M. D. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews) · doi:10.1109/tsmcc.2010.2103057 · Cited by 99
Kofler, M. J., Raiker, J. S., Sarver, D. E., Wells, E. L., & Soto, E. F. (2016) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2016.04.004 · Cited by 88
Woodley, M. A., te Nijenhuis, J., & Murphy, R. (2013) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2013.04.006 · Cited by 82
Guidelines for Meta-Analyses of Counseling Psychology Research
Quintana, S. M., & Minami, T. (2006) · The Counseling Psychologist · doi:10.1177/0011000006286991 · Cited by 83
Comparison of two random-effects methods of meta-analysis.
Hall, S. M., & Brannick, M. T. (2002) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.377 · Cited by 79
Drivers of Consumer Adoption of e-Commerce: a Meta-Analysis
Zerbini, C., Bijmolt, T. H. A., Maestripieri, S., & Luceri, B. (2022) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2022.04.003 · Cited by 68
The Reliability of Peer Assessments: A Meta-Analysis
Goldman, R. L. (1994) · Evaluation & the Health Professions · doi:10.1177/016327879401700101 · Cited by 62
BEAULIEU‐PRÉVOST, D., & ZADRA, A. (2007) · Journal of Sleep Research · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2869.2007.00572.x · Cited by 59
Ayaz, M., & Söylemez, M. (2015) · Education and Science · doi:10.15390/eb.2015.4000 · Cited by 57
The use of meta-analysis in MIS research: promises and problems
Hwang, M. I. (1996) · ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems · doi:10.1145/264417.264433 · Cited by 56
Meta-analysis, can it ever fail?
Kotiaho, J. S., & Tomkins, J. L. (2002) · Oikos · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.960316.x · Cited by 52
A meta-analysis: age and second language grammar acquisition.
Qureshi, M. A. (2016) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2016.06.001 · Cited by 48
Villanova, P., & Roman, M. A. (1993) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/1053-4822(93)90021-u · Cited by 39
Reliability assessment of pedometer activity measurements
Tryon, W. W., Pinto, L. P., & Morrison, D. F. (1991) · Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment · doi:10.1007/bf00960737 · Cited by 34
Morris, S. B. (2008) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428106295494 · Cited by 26
Definition x Treatment Interactions for Students with Learning Disabilities
Swanson, H. L., & Hoskyn, M. (1999) · School Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/02796015.1999.12085992 · Cited by 23
Domain-specific innovativeness: A meta-analysis in business and consumer
Araujo, C. F., Ladeira, W. J., Santini, F. D. O., & Sampaio, C. H. (2016) · RAI revista de administração e inovação · doi:10.1016/j.rai.2016.03.003 · Cited by 22
How does learners’ L2 utterance fluency relate to their L1? A meta‐analysis
Gao, J., & Sun, P. P. (2024) · International Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1111/ijal.12493 · Cited by 18
Mureşan, V., Montgomery, G. H., & David, D. (2012) · Journal of Technology in Human Services · doi:10.1080/15228835.2011.653290 · Cited by 16
Samritin, S., Susanto, A., Manaf, A., & Hukom, J. (2023) · Jurnal Elemen · doi:10.29408/jel.v9i1.6141 · Cited by 14
Ferguson, C. J., & Smith, S. (2024) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2023.101905 · Cited by 14
Random or Fixed? An Empirical Examination of Meta-Analysis Model Choices
Slaney, K. L., Tafreshi, D., & Hohn, R. (2018) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/gpr0000140 · Cited by 13
The asymmetry of working memory training transfer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Fu, J., Zhou, Y., Yuan, M., & Cai, Y. (2026) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-026-02994-5
Metadata
- Authors
- Raudenbush, S. W., Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1991-03
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 413
- Pages
- 242
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4229570919
- Cited by
- 2,327
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 58.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.