Cited by 22Technology Adoption and User BehaviourInnovation Diffusion and ForecastingConsumer Behavior and Marketing Influence

Domain-specific innovativeness: A meta-analysis in business and consumer

Open access
Araujo, Clecio Falcão, Ladeira, Wagner Junior, Santini, Fernando de Oliveira, Sampaio, Claudio Hoffmann·2016·RAI revista de administração e inovação

Abstract

The specific domain of a product and the perception of innovation are topics that aroused interest in research in the last twenty years, especially after the development of the domain-specific innovativeness (DSI) construct. This paper conducted a meta-analysis to assess the consequents of the DSI. To this end, a total of 276 works were identified in nine databases, of which 78 were included in the study work, generating 98 observations for a sample set of 40,641. The results showed significant relationships between the consequents: adoption of innovation, attitude, behavioral intention, product usage, opinion leader and risk perception. Furthermore, it was noted that the research method (survey vs. experimental) and the country of application (Western vs. Eastern) were moderating factors of the relationships between DSI, opinion leader and behavioral intention.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rai.2016.03.003

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous work has identified self-control and domain-specific innovativeness as important antecedents to food consumption behavior.

    “Previous work has identified self-control (de Ridder, Lensvelt-Mulders, Finkenauer, Stok, & Baumeister, 2012;Stautz, Zupan, Field, & Marteau, 2018) and domain-specific innovativeness (Araujo, Ladeira, & Santini, 2016;Huotilainen, Pirttilä-Backman, & Tuorila, 2006) as important antecedents to food consumption behavior, but to our knowledge, no study of which we are aware has identified a segment of”
  • Meta-analytic evidence points to associations between domain-specific innovativeness and innovation adoption, attitude, behavioral intentions, and product usage.

    “Meta-analytic evidence points to associations between domain-specific innovativeness and innovation adoption, attitude, behavioral intentions, and product usage (Araujo et al., 2016).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Goldsmith, R. E., & Flynn, L. R. (1995). The domain specific innovativeness scale: Theoretical and practical dimensions. Association for Marketing The- ory and Practice Proceedings, 4(1995), 177-182.
  2. Roehrich, G. (2004). Consumer innovativeness concepts and measurements. Journal of Business Research, 57, 671-677.
  3. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York, NY: The Free Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Araujo, C. F., Ladeira, W. J., Santini, F. D. O., & Sampaio, C. H.
Affiliations
Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (BR)
Venue
RAI revista de administração e inovação
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2016-04
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
99-106
ISSN
1809-2039 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2472625288
Cited by
22
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3
FWCI
0.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • RAI revista de administração e inovação (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) (submittedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
Keywords
domain-specific innovativeness, innovation perception, innovation adoption, consumer attitudes, behavioral intention, product use, opinion leaders, risk perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review