The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Four Ethical Issues of the Information Age
Abstract
In western societies more people are employed collecting, handling and distributing information than in any other occupation. Millions of computers inhabit the earth and many millions of miles of optical fiber, wire and air waves link people, their computers and the vast array of information handling devices together. There are many unique challenges we face in this age of information. They stem from the nature of information itself. Information is the means through which the mind expands and increases its capacity to achieve its goals, often as the result of an input from another mind. Two forces threaten our privacy. One is the growth of information technology, with its enhanced capacity for surveillance, communication, computation, storage, and retrieval. A second, and more insidious threat, is the increased value of information in decisionmaking. Collections of information reveal intimate details about a person and can thereby deprive the person of the opportunity to form certain professional and personal relationships.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Solzhenitsyn, 1968, The Cancer Ward
- U.S. House of Representatives, 1966, The Computer and Invasion of Privacy
Cited by
Pavlou, P. A., Liang, H., & Xue, Y. (2007) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148783 · Cited by 2,646
An Extended Privacy Calculus Model for E-Commerce Transactions
Dinev, T., & Hart, P. (2006) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1060.0080 · Cited by 2,640
Information Privacy: Measuring Individuals’ Concerns About Organizational Practices1
Smith, H. J., Milberg, S. J., & Burke, S. J. (1996) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249477 · Cited by 2,266
Information Privacy Research: an Interdisciplinary Review1
Smith, H. J., Dinev, T., & Xu, H. (2011) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/41409970 · Cited by 2,013
Privacy in the Digital Age: a Review of Information Privacy Research in Information Systems1
Bélanger, F., & Crossler, R. E. (2011) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/41409971 · Cited by 1,339
Awad, N. F., & Krishnan, M. S. (2006) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148715 · Cited by 1,252
An Empirical Examination of the Concern for Information Privacy Instrument
Stewart, K. A., & Segars, A. H. (2002) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.13.1.36.97 · Cited by 734
Culnan, M. J. (1993) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249775 · Cited by 618
Corporate digital responsibility
Lobschat, L., Mueller, B., Eggers, F., Brandimarte, L., Diefenbach, S., Kroschke, M., & Wirtz, J. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.006 · Cited by 573
Values, personal information privacy, and regulatory approaches
Milberg, S. J., Burke, S. J., Smith, H. J., & Kallman, E. A. (1995) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/219663.219683 · Cited by 343
The Customer Economics of Internet Privacy
Rust, R. T., Kannan, P. K., & Peng, N. (2002) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/009207002236917 · Cited by 246
Essén, A. (2008) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.005 · Cited by 145
The uniqueness debate in computer ethics: What exactly is at issue, and why does it matter?
Tavani, H. T. (2002) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1023/a:1015283808882 · Cited by 81
Attitude toward ethical behavior in computer use: a shifting model
Leonard, L. N. K., & Paul Cronan, T. (2005) · Industrial Management & Data Systems · doi:10.1108/02635570510633239 · Cited by 74
From computer ethics and the ethics of AI towards an ethics of digital ecosystems
Stahl, B. C. (2022) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-021-00080-1 · Cited by 68
A global perspective on library association codes of ethics
Shachaf, P. (2005) · Library & Information Science Research · doi:10.1016/j.lisr.2005.08.008 · Cited by 54
Balancing privacy rights and surveillance analytics: a decision process guide
Power, D. J., Heavin, C., & O’Connor, Y. (2021) · Journal of Business Analytics · doi:10.1080/2573234x.2021.1920856 · Cited by 48
Service equality in virtual reference
Shachaf, P., Oltmann, S. M., & Horowitz, S. M. (2008) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20757 · Cited by 38
University of South Alabama, Howard, M. C., Hair, J. F., & University of South Alabama (2023) · AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.17705/1thci.00084 · Cited by 27
Improving Social Responsibility of Artificial Intelligence by Using ISO 26000
Zhao, W.-W. (2018) · IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering · doi:10.1088/1757-899x/428/1/012049 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Mason, R. O., Collins, C. P., & Cox, E. L.
- Venue
- MIS Quarterly
- Publisher
- MIS Quarterly
- Published
- 1986-03-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-12
- ISSN
- 0276-7783 (ISSN-L)
- 2162-9730
- OpenAlex
- W1547183878
- Cited by
- 875
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.