The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Exit, Voice, Loyalty, and Neglect as Responses to Job Dissatisfaction: A Multidimensional Scaling Study.
Abstract
This study focuses on workers' responses to job dissatisfaction. It is suggested that four theoretical categories—exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect—characterize a diverse group of more specific beh...
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Smith, C. A. (1993) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.538 · Cited by 6,458
WHEN JOB DISSATISFACTION LEADS TO CREATIVITY: ENCOURAGING THE EXPRESSION OF VOICE.
Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2001) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/3069410 · Cited by 2,780
Conceptualizing Employee Silence and Employee Voice as Multidimensional Constructs*
Dyne, L. V., Ang, S., & Botero, I. C. (2003) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00384 · Cited by 2,062
Chamberlin, M., Newton, D. W., & Lepine, J. A. (2017) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/peps.12185 · Cited by 532
Authentic Leadership and Employee Voice Behavior: A Multi-Level Psychological Process
Hsiung, H.-H. (2012) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-011-1043-2 · Cited by 347
Sherf, E. N., Parke, M. R., & Isaakyan, S. (2021) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2018.1428 · Cited by 349
On Being Both With Us and Against Us: A Normative Conflict Model of Dissent in Social Groups
Packer, D. J. (2008) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868307309606 · Cited by 311
Speaking Up: Identifying Employees’ Upward Dissent Strategies
Kassing, J. W. (2002) · Management Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/089331802237234 · Cited by 162
Hands in the pockets of mercurial donors: NGO response to shifting funding priorities
AbouAssi, K. (2013) · Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0899764012439629 · Cited by 142
Speaking up to prevent harm: A systematic review of the safety voice literature
Noort, M. C., Reader, T. W., & Gillespie, A. (2019) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2019.04.039 · Cited by 141
Microphones, not megaphones: Functional crowdworker voice regimes on digital work platforms
Gegenhuber, T., Ellmer, M., & Schüßler, E. (2021) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726720915761 · Cited by 115
Laeeque, S. H., Bilal, A., Babar, S., Khan, Z., & Ul Rahman, S. (2018) · Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma · doi:10.1080/10926771.2017.1410751 · Cited by 73
Basar, U., & Basim, N. (2016) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.12958 · Cited by 55
Song, C., & Lee, C. H. (2020) · Leadership & Organization Development Journal · doi:10.1108/lodj-04-2019-0149 · Cited by 43
Effective voice: Beyond exit and affect in online communities
Frey, S., & Schneider, N. (2023) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448211044025 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Farrell, D.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Journal
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 1983-12-01
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 596-607
- ISSN
- 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
- 1948-0989
- OpenAlex
- W2058747318
- Cited by
- 787
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
