Cited by 347Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorLabor Movements and UnionsEmployee Performance and Leadership

Authentic Leadership and Employee Voice Behavior: A Multi-Level Psychological Process

Hsiung, Hsin-Hua·2012·Journal of Business Ethics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10551-011-1043-2

Cites

83 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 85 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hsiung, H.-H.
Affiliations
National Dong Hwa University (TW)
Corresponding author
Hsiung, Hsin-Hua
Venue
Journal of Business Ethics
Published
2011-10-11
Volume
107
Issue
3
Pages
349-361
ISSN
  • 0167-4544 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0697
OpenAlex
W1987377780
Cited by
347
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
13.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Business Ethics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Labor Movements and Unions
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Leadership
Keywords
authentic leadership, employee voice behavior, positive mood, leader-member exchange, mediation, cross-level effects, real estate agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review